Are Large Vision Language Models Good Game Players?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02358v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 07:29:03 GMT
• Title: Are Large Vision Language Models Good Game Players?
• Authors: Xinyu Wang, Bohan Zhuang, Qi Wu,
• Abstract summary: Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable abilities in understanding and reasoning about both visual and textual information.<n>Existing evaluation methods for LVLMs, primarily based on benchmarks like Visual Question Answering, often fail to capture the full scope of LVLMs' capabilities.<n>We propose method, a game-based evaluation framework designed to provide a comprehensive assessment of LVLMs' cognitive and reasoning skills in structured environments.
• Score: 25.49713745405194
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable abilities in understanding and reasoning about both visual and textual information. However, existing evaluation methods for LVLMs, primarily based on benchmarks like Visual Question Answering and image captioning, often fail to capture the full scope of LVLMs' capabilities. These benchmarks are limited by issues such as inadequate assessment of detailed visual perception, data contamination, and a lack of focus on multi-turn reasoning. To address these challenges, we propose \method{}, a game-based evaluation framework designed to provide a comprehensive assessment of LVLMs' cognitive and reasoning skills in structured environments. \method{} uses a set of games to evaluate LVLMs on four core tasks: Perceiving, Question Answering, Rule Following, and End-to-End Playing, with each target task designed to assess specific abilities, including visual perception, reasoning, decision-making, etc. Based on this framework, we conduct extensive experiments that explore the limitations of current LVLMs, such as handling long structured outputs and perceiving detailed and dense elements. Code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/xinke-wang/LVLM-Playground.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: A Comprehensive Evaluation [53.84282335629258]
  We introduce a comprehensive fine-grained evaluation benchmark, i.e., FG-BMK, comprising 3.49 million questions and 3.32 million images. Our evaluation systematically examines LVLMs from both human-oriented and machine-oriented perspectives. We uncover key findings regarding the influence of training paradigms, modality alignment, perturbation susceptibility, and fine-grained category reasoning on task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T09:30:41Z)
• V-MAGE: A Game Evaluation Framework for Assessing Visual-Centric Capabilities in Multimodal Large Language Models [84.27290155010533]
  V-MAGE is a game-based evaluation framework designed to assess visual reasoning capabilities of MLLMs. We use V-MAGE to evaluate leading MLLMs, revealing significant challenges in their visual perception and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T15:43:01Z)
• Where do Large Vision-Language Models Look at when Answering Questions? [35.39354978511109]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have shown promising performance in vision-language understanding and reasoning tasks. We extend existing heatmap visualization methods to support LVLMs for open-ended visual question answering. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art LVLMs on benchmarks designed to require visual information to answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T04:34:43Z)
• FiVL: A Framework for Improved Vision-Language Alignment [10.184567639685321]
  We introduce FiVL, a novel method for constructing datasets designed to train LVLMs for enhanced visual grounding.<n>These datasets can be utilized for both training and assessing an LVLM's ability to use image content as substantive evidence.<n>To demonstrate the utility of our dataset, we introduce an innovative training task that outperforms baselines alongside a validation method and application for explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T09:24:10Z)
• Good Questions Help Zero-Shot Image Reasoning [110.1671684828904]
  Question-Driven Visual Exploration (QVix) is a novel prompting strategy that enhances the exploratory capabilities of large vision-language models (LVLMs) QVix enables a wider exploration of visual scenes, improving the LVLMs' reasoning accuracy and depth in tasks such as visual question answering and visual entailment. Our evaluations on various challenging zero-shot vision-language benchmarks, including ScienceQA and fine-grained visual classification, demonstrate that QVix significantly outperforms existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T03:18:51Z)
• Behind the Magic, MERLIM: Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark for Large Image-Language Models [50.653838482083614]
  This paper introduces a scalable test-bed to assess the capabilities of IT-LVLMs on fundamental computer vision tasks. MERLIM contains over 300K image-question pairs and has a strong focus on detecting cross-modal "hallucination" events in IT-LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T16:39:36Z)
• TouchStone: Evaluating Vision-Language Models by Language Models [91.69776377214814]
  We propose an evaluation method that uses strong large language models as judges to comprehensively evaluate the various abilities of LVLMs. We construct a comprehensive visual dialogue dataset TouchStone, consisting of open-world images and questions, covering five major categories of abilities and 27 subtasks. We demonstrate that powerful LVLMs, such as GPT-4, can effectively score dialogue quality by leveraging their textual capabilities alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T17:52:04Z)
• Benchmarking Zero-Shot Recognition with Vision-Language Models: Challenges on Granularity and Specificity [45.86789047206224]
  This paper presents novel benchmarks for evaluating vision-language models (VLMs) in zero-shot recognition. Our benchmarks test VLMs' consistency in understanding concepts across semantic granularity levels and their response to varying text specificity. Findings show that VLMs favor moderately fine-grained concepts and struggle with specificity, often misjudging texts that differ from their training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T09:29:06Z)
• LVLM-eHub: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [55.304181390027274]
  This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of publicly available large multimodal models by building a LVLM evaluation Hub (LVLM-eHub) Our LVLM-eHub consists of $8$ representative LVLMs such as InstructBLIP and MiniGPT-4, which are thoroughly evaluated by a quantitative capability evaluation and an online arena platform. The study reveals several innovative findings. First, instruction-tuned LVLM with massive in-domain data such as InstructBLIP heavily overfits many existing tasks, generalizing poorly in the open-world scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T16:39:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.