Navigating Unreliable Parametric and Contextual Knowledge: Explicit Knowledge Conflict Resolution for LLM Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20245v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 13:56:31 GMT
• Title: Navigating Unreliable Parametric and Contextual Knowledge: Explicit Knowledge Conflict Resolution for LLM Inference
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across a wide range of language-based tasks.<n>The integration of external knowledge can introduce conflicts, not only between the model's internal parametric knowledge and the external information, but also among multiple pieces of external contexts.<n>We propose a novel framework that moves beyond the conventional binary choice paradigm and incorporates an explicit conflict-resolution mechanism based on a multi-agent reasoning approach.
• Score: 19.125715989350347
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across a wide range of language-based tasks by leveraging both extensive parametric knowledge and in-context learning ability, enabling them to incorporate external information provided in the input prompt. However, the integration of external knowledge can introduce conflicts, not only between the model's internal parametric knowledge and the external information, but also among multiple pieces of external contexts. Existing approaches typically assume that either the model or the provided context is reliable, overlooking the possibility that both sources may contain errors, and avoid conflicts by privileging one source over the other, rather than actively resolving inconsistencies. To address these limitations, we propose a novel framework MACR for LLM knowledge conflict resolution that moves beyond the conventional binary choice paradigm and incorporates an explicit conflict-resolution mechanism based on a multi-agent reasoning approach. Specifically, we first propose an adaptive knowledge assessment and retrieval approach that employs a modified semantic entropy measure to quantify an LLM's confidence in its answer to a given query. Based on this confidence estimation, MACR either externalizes the model's internal knowledge as textual representations or retrieves relevant external knowledge when internal knowledge is insufficient, generating basic contexts for subsequent reasoning. Then we introduce an inductive multi-agent reasoning framework with three specialized agents that, respectively, induce explicit rules, analyze potential conflicts, and resolve inconsistencies across all available contexts. Empirical results demonstrate that MACR significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across benchmarks, while also providing interpretable resolutions of explicit conflicts.

Related papers

• CLAIM: Leading Open-domain Active Clarification of Large Language Models with Uncertainty Measurement [50.91045324738942]
  CLAIM is an uncertainty-driven framework for active clarification learning in open-domain settings.<n>We propose an entropy-driven synthetic data generation pipeline that integrates uncertainty estimation with semantic clustering and reasoning-based judgments.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that CLAIM can learn stable and generalizable clarification strategies without relying on manually labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T04:27:45Z)
• Leveraging LLM Parametric Knowledge for Fact Checking without Retrieval [60.25608870901428]
  Trustworthiness is a core research challenge for agentic AI systems built on Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose the task of fact-checking without retrieval, focusing on the verification of arbitrary natural language claims, independent of their source robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T18:42:51Z)
• TruthfulRAG: Resolving Factual-level Conflicts in Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Knowledge Graphs [10.861331756147477]
  We propose TruthfulRAG to resolve factual-level knowledge conflicts in RAG systems.<n>TruthfulRAG constructs Knowledge Graphs (KGs) by systematically extracting triples from retrieved content.<n>Extensive experiments reveal that TruthfulRAG outperforms existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T14:49:44Z)
• That's Deprecated! Understanding, Detecting, and Steering Knowledge Conflicts in Language Models for Code Generation [55.78914774437411]
  Large language models (LLMs) behave when faced with discrepancies between their parametric knowledge and conflicting information contained in a prompt.<n>We propose a domain-agnostic framework for constructing and interpreting such conflicts.<n>We show that activation-level steering can achieve up to a textbf12.6% improvement in steering success over a random baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T22:27:56Z)
• Probing Latent Knowledge Conflict for Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation [46.03923254984181]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful paradigm to enhance the factuality of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Existing approaches to improving contextual faithfulness rely on external interventions, such as prompt engineering, decoding constraints, or reward-based fine-tuning.<n>We propose CLEAR (Conflict-Localized and Enhanced Attention for RAG), a framework that decomposes context into fine-grained sentence-level knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T12:48:24Z)
• Conflict-Aware Soft Prompting for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [13.671410389511498]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge into their input prompts.<n>RAG often fails to resolve the conflict between incorrect external context and correct parametric knowledge, known as context-memory conflict.<n>We introduce Conflict-Aware REtrieval-Augmented Generation (CARE), consisting of a context assessor and a base LLM.<n>CARE effectively mitigates context-memory conflicts, leading to an average performance gain of 5.0% on QA and fact-checking benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T05:36:29Z)
• MAGIC: A Multi-Hop and Graph-Based Benchmark for Inter-Context Conflicts in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [7.927396904317054]
  Knowledge conflict often arises in RAG systems, where retrieved documents may be inconsistent with one another or contradict the model's parametric knowledge.<n>We propose a knowledge graph (KG)-based framework that generates varied and subtle conflicts between two similar yet distinct contexts.<n> Experimental results on our benchmark, MAGIC, provide intriguing insights into the inner workings of LLMs regarding knowledge conflict.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T07:19:49Z)
• Bridging External and Parametric Knowledge: Mitigating Hallucination of LLMs with Shared-Private Semantic Synergy in Dual-Stream Knowledge [19.767087192966223]
  We propose a Dual-Stream Knowledge-Augmented Framework for Shared-Private Semantic Synergy (DSSP-RAG)<n>Central to the framework is a novel approach that refines self-attention into a mixed-attention, distinguishing shared and private semantics for a controlled internal-external knowledge integration.<n>Experiments on benchmark datasets show that DSSP-RAG can effectively resolve conflicts and enhance the complementarity of dual-stream knowledge, leading to superior performance over strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T17:00:23Z)
• CoRe-MMRAG: Cross-Source Knowledge Reconciliation for Multimodal RAG [53.950029990391066]
  Cross-source knowledge textbfReconciliation for Multimodal RAG (CoRe-MMRAG)<n>We propose a novel end-to-end framework that effectively reconciles inconsistencies across knowledge sources.<n>Experiments on KB-VQA benchmarks show that CoRe-MMRAG achieves substantial improvements over baseline methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T07:32:40Z)
• ParamMute: Suppressing Knowledge-Critical FFNs for Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation [91.20492150248106]
  We investigate the internal mechanisms behind unfaithful generation and identify a subset of mid-to-deep feed-forward networks (FFNs) that are disproportionately activated in such cases.<n>We propose Parametric Knowledge Muting through FFN Suppression (ParamMute), a framework that improves contextual faithfulness by suppressing the activation of unfaithfulness-associated FFNs.<n> Experimental results show that ParamMute significantly enhances faithfulness across both CoFaithfulQA and the established ConFiQA benchmark, achieving substantial reductions in reliance on parametric memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T15:50:41Z)
• Insight Over Sight: Exploring the Vision-Knowledge Conflicts in Multimodal LLMs [55.74117540987519]
  This paper explores the problem of commonsense level vision-knowledge conflict in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>We introduce an automated framework, augmented with human-in-the-loop quality control, to generate inputs designed to simulate and evaluate these conflicts in MLLMs.<n>Using this framework, we have crafted a diagnostic benchmark consisting of 374 original images and 1,122 high-quality question-answer pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:31:17Z)
• Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
  Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text. Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.