Optimal Order of Multi-Agent and General Many-Body Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20485v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:03:03 GMT
• Title: Optimal Order of Multi-Agent and General Many-Body Systems
• Abstract summary: This paper develops a general framework for analyzing multi-agent systems with feedback loops between agents actions and collective observations.<n>The framework is built on two fundamental agent-level variables: power, which measures agent influence on collective outcomes, and response functions, which determine how agents react to observations.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper develops a general framework for analyzing multi-agent systems with feedback loops between agents actions and collective observations. The framework is built on two fundamental agent-level variables: power, which measures agent influence on collective outcomes, and response functions, which determine how agents react to observations. We derive how macroscopic properties, including total power, useful power, entropy, order, fragility, and mobility, emerge from these two variables of heterogeneous agents. To study the trade off between growth and resilience, we introduce a system-level utility function parameterized by a risk-appetite coefficient and derive an optimal degree of order that balances productivity, stability, and adaptability. The analysis suggests that stronger synchronization can increase collective output but may also increase systemic fragility and reduce mobility. We further argue that order, entropy, information, and useful energy are task-dependent and system-relative concepts whose meanings depend on the objectives of the system. By measuring and designing agent power distributions and response functions, it may be possible to better understand, predict, and optimize collective behavior and identify the conditions under which collective intelligence and optimal order emerge.

Related papers

• Co-Evolution in Agentic Systems: Toward Self-Directed Evolution Beyond Human Design [55.30329388138526]
  This survey focuses on co-evolution in agentic systems, a multi-component form of self-evolution in which multiple agents and their environment impose adaptive pressure on one another.<n>To organize existing papers, we propose a progressive three-stage taxonomy that traces how the system gradually sheds human-engineered constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T23:10:40Z)
• Autonomous Information Seeking: A Roadmap for Agentic Recommender Systems [64.88044474617854]
  The rapid integration of large language model-based agents into recommender systems has driven a shift from static, ranking-based pipelines toward autonomous and interactive systems.<n>This survey introduces a unified taxonomy grounded in the level of autonomy and three core paradigms of agentic recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-05T17:55:05Z)
• Agentic Hives: Equilibrium, Indeterminacy, and Endogenous Cycles in Self-Organizing Multi-Agent Systems [0.0]
  Current multi-agent AI systems operate with a fixed number of agents whose roles are specified at design time.<n>No formal theory governs when agents should be created, destroyed, or re-specialized.<n>We introduce the Agentic Hive, a framework in which a variable population of autonomous micro-agents-each equipped with a sandboxed execution environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T13:22:23Z)
• Guided Collaboration in Heterogeneous LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems via Entropy-Based Understanding Assessment and Experience Retrieval [35.96356869281219]
  We describe a counterintuitive phenomenon in the strong-weak system: a strong-weak collaboration may under-perform weak-weak combinations.<n>We propose an Entropy-Based Adaptive Guidance Framework that dynamically aligns the guidance with the cognitive state of each agent.<n>Our approach consistently enhances the effectiveness and stability of heterogeneous collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-14T07:10:04Z)
• Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models [122.81018455095999]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, but struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments.<n>Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T18:58:23Z)
• Emergent Coordination in Multi-Agent Language Models [2.504366738288215]
  We introduce an information-theoretic framework to test whether multi-agent systems show signs of higher-order structure.<n>This information decomposition lets us measure whether dynamical emergence is present in multi-agent LLM systems.<n>We apply our framework to experiments using a simple guessing game without direct agent communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T11:26:41Z)
• Stochastic Self-Organization in Multi-Agent Systems [28.70691568233268]
  Multi-agent systems (MAS) based on Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to solve tasks that are beyond the reach of any single LLM.<n>We introduce a response-conditioned framework that adapts communication on-the-fly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T09:08:04Z)
• Understanding Action Effects through Instrumental Empowerment in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [39.74025439412935]
  This work investigates whether meaningful insights into agent behaviors can be extracted solely by analyzing the policy distribution.<n>Inspired by the phenomenon that intelligent agents tend to pursue convergent instrumental values, we introduce Intended Cooperation Values (ICVs)<n>ICVs measure an agent's action effect on its teammates' policies by assessing their decision (un)certainty and preference alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T15:35:59Z)
• A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: On Path to Artificial Super Intelligence [87.08051686357206]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities but remain fundamentally static.<n>As LLMs are increasingly deployed in open-ended, interactive environments, this static nature has become a critical bottleneck.<n>This survey provides the first systematic and comprehensive review of self-evolving agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:59:05Z)
• Learning responsibility allocations for multi-agent interactions: A differentiable optimization approach with control barrier functions [12.074590482085831]
  We seek to codify factors governing safe multi-agent interactions via the lens of responsibility. We propose a data-driven modeling approach based on control barrier functions and differentiable optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T20:20:41Z)
• On the Complexity of Multi-Agent Decision Making: From Learning in Games to Partial Monitoring [105.13668993076801]
  A central problem in the theory of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is to understand what structural conditions and algorithmic principles lead to sample-efficient learning guarantees. We study this question in a general framework for interactive decision making with multiple agents. We show that characterizing the statistical complexity for multi-agent decision making is equivalent to characterizing the statistical complexity of single-agent decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T06:46:22Z)
• Randomized Entity-wise Factorization for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [59.62721526353915]
  Multi-agent settings in the real world often involve tasks with varying types and quantities of agents and non-agent entities. Our method aims to leverage these commonalities by asking the question: What is the expected utility of each agent when only considering a randomly selected sub-group of its observed entities?''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T18:28:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.