The New Associationism: Lessons from Deep Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20600v1
• Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 10:51:37 GMT
• Title: The New Associationism: Lessons from Deep Learning
• Abstract summary: This paper argues that taking AI seriously supports a modest but genuine associationism.<n>The central finding is that supervised learning underlies a surprisingly wide range of contemporary AI systems.<n>It defuses the once-influential argument that associationist mechanisms are too limited to account for human cognitive capacities.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: What can the success of modern AI tell us about how humans learn? This paper argues that taking AI seriously as a model of human learning supports a modest but genuine associationism. The central finding is that supervised learning -- learning driven by evaluative feedback -- underlies a surprisingly wide range of contemporary AI systems, from large language models to game-playing agents, differing primarily in how much work is required to generate the relevant feedback signal. This vindicates associationist ideals of a uniform, gradual, error-driven learning mechanism operating across domains, and defuses the once-influential argument that associationist mechanisms are too limited to account for human cognitive capacities. At the same time, the successes of deep learning depend on computational architectures that go well beyond anything classical associationists envisaged, and supervised learning operates within these as one component rather than a complete account of learning.

Related papers

• The Pedagogy of AI Mistakes: Fostering Higher-Order Thinking [26.81026121718816]
  We argue that instructors can engage students in the fundamental processes of higher-order thinking by framing AI as a learning companion''<n>We examine how structured interaction with AI-generated errors supports metacognitive engagement, reinforces disciplinary rigor, and relates to students' perceived AI literacy and subject-matter competency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-06T21:50:46Z)
• Agentivism: a learning theory for the age of artificial intelligence [2.278981812218892]
  Generative and agentic AI create a new condition by allowing learners to delegate cognitive work to systems that can generate, recommend, and sometimes act on the learner's behalf.<n>This creates a fundamental challenge for learning theory: successful performance can no longer be assumed to indicate learning.<n>We propose Agentivism, a learning theory for human-AI interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T05:09:48Z)
• Why teaching resists automation in an AI-inundated era: Human judgment, non-modular work, and the limits of delegation [0.0]
  I argue that although AI can support some bounded functions, instructional work remains difficult to automate in meaningful ways.<n>As long as educational practice relies on emergent understanding of human cognition and learning, teaching remains a form of professional work that resists automation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T16:49:24Z)
• Why AI systems don't learn and what to do about it: Lessons on autonomous learning from cognitive science [79.50667364149979]
  We critically examine the limitations of current AI models in achieving autonomous learning and propose a learning architecture inspired by human and animal cognition.<n>The proposed framework integrates learning from observation (System A) and learning from active behavior (System B) while switching flexibly between these learning modes as a function of internally generated meta-control signals (System M).
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T14:54:56Z)
• Who Is Doing the Thinking? AI as a Dynamic Cognitive Partner: A Learner-Informed Framework [0.0]
  This study proposes a framework positioning AI as a dynamic cognitive partner whose function shifts across learning situations.<n>We identified nine interrelated dimensions through which learners described AI as partnering with their cognition.<n>Students distinguished between productive support that extends understanding and unproductive reliance that replaces cognitive effort, indicating situational awareness of when AI should and should not be used.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-17T15:07:06Z)
• Kolb-Based Experiential Learning for Generalist Agents with Human-Level Kaggle Data Science Performance [81.05882480184587]
  We propose a computational framework of Kolb's learning cycle with Vygotsky's ZPD for autonomous agents.<n>Agent K is the 1st AI system to successfully integrate Kolb- and Vygotsky-inspired human cognitive learning.<n>With 9 gold, 8 silver, and 12 bronze medals level performance - including 4 gold and 4 silver on prize-awarding competitions - Agent K is the 1st AI system to successfully integrate Kolb- and Vygotsky-inspired human cognitive learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T23:55:23Z)
• Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic Systems [67.01132165581667]
  We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components. We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z)
• Progressively Efficient Learning [58.6490456517954]
  We develop a novel learning framework named Communication-Efficient Interactive Learning (CEIL) CEIL leads to emergence of a human-like pattern where the learner and the teacher communicate efficiently by exchanging increasingly more abstract intentions. Agents trained with CEIL quickly master new tasks, outperforming non-hierarchical and hierarchical imitation learning by up to 50% and 20% in absolute success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:52:04Z)
• Incremental procedural and sensorimotor learning in cognitive humanoid robots [52.77024349608834]
  This work presents a cognitive agent that can learn procedures incrementally. We show the cognitive functions required in each substage and how adding new functions helps address tasks previously unsolved by the agent. Results show that this approach is capable of solving complex tasks incrementally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-30T22:51:31Z)
• Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research Challenges [80.39805582015133]
  We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI) Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently. We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.