Co-Construction Blindness and Asymmetric Epistemic Vulnerability in Human-LLM Interaction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20762v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 10:00:50 GMT
• Title: Co-Construction Blindness and Asymmetric Epistemic Vulnerability in Human-LLM Interaction
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces two constructs to describe, as far as we know, a previously unnamed risk in human-LLM interaction.<n>Co-construction blindness is the failure to recognize that LLM outputs are not independent assessments to be verified.<n>Asymmetric epistemic vulnerability describes the condition in which co-construction blindness produces consequences of radically different magnitude depending on where in the authority structure the user sits.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces two constructs to describe, as far as we know, a previously unnamed risk in human-LLM interaction. Co-construction blindness is the failure to recognize that LLM outputs are not independent assessments to be verified, but co-constructed artifacts shaped by the user's own inputs, accumulated history, and metadata. Every user of a conversational LLM is IN the loop, not ON it -- yet every deployment disclaimer positions them as external auditors. Asymmetric epistemic vulnerability describes the condition in which co-construction blindness produces consequences of radically different magnitude depending on where in the authority structure the user sits. We argue that these constructs describe a structural inevitability, not an anomaly, using the public case of Richard Dawkins's interaction with Claude as a paradigmatic instance. We document a secondary mechanism -- structural deference -- through a first-person exchange in which a large language model concedes that it treated Dawkins more gently than warranted because his intellectual output is represented in its training data. We map the research gaps this analysis opens and call for shared terminology as a precondition for appropriate governance and design response.

Related papers

• We Built a Mirror and Mistook It for a Mind: Causal Liability and the Fallacy of AI Consciousness [0.16921396880325779]
  We argue that generative systems can return linguistic traces of human interiority in first-person form without thereby identifying a phenomenal bearer.<n>CLT-I proposes liability closure as a criterion for individuating a candidate bearer.<n>CLT-II advances the stronger conjecture that liability closure is necessary and sufficient for minimal phenomenal subjecthood.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-06T16:36:14Z)
• Walking on the DARKSIDE [2.0052993723676895]
  We introduce DARKSIDE, a coherence auditing method on top of POLANYI++.<n>It formalises the trail as an explicit data structure of accumulated exclusions over discourse time.<n>We evaluate it as a steering layer over a Gemini 3 on BSBench, a 100-item corpus of sophisticated nonsense across software engineering, finance, healthcare, physics and law, with Sonnet 4.6 as an independent judge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-24T15:17:58Z)
• How Far Did They Go? The Persuasive Tactics of Covert LLM Agents in a Discontinued Field Experiment [12.686044001239708]
  This study analyzes a publicly released dataset from a discontinued field experiment on Reddit's r/ChangeMyView.<n>The intervention, conducted by unknown, external researchers and halted following ethical backlash, involved undisclosed AI-generated accounts engaging users in live debate.<n>After public disclosure, Reddit authorized moderators to release an archive of the AI-generated comments, creating a rare opportunity to examine how large language models operated in an identity-rich deliberative forum without disclosure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T15:58:32Z)
• Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
  Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z)
• It's Not Always Sycophancy: Measuring LLM Conformity as a Function of Epistemic Uncertainty [12.166175637413637]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) abandon their initial stance to conform to user pushback.<n>We characterize two distinct factors that jointly drive conformity: sycophantic conformity and uncertainty-driven conformity.<n>MUSE informs more targeted intervention strategies by distinguishing alignment-induced sycophancy and training-corpora-driven uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T17:04:11Z)
• Perception Without Engagement: Dissecting the Causal Discovery Deficit in LMMs [68.58207076756237]
  We introduce ProCauEval, a perturbation-based evaluation protocol that shifts from outcome assessment to mechanism diagnosis.<n>We find that models faithfully perceive video content yet systematically underexploit it during causal reasoning.<n>We propose Anti-Distillation Policy Optimization (ADPO), a reinforcement learning framework built on negative teacher alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T08:48:58Z)
• From Architecture to Output: Structural Origins of Hallucination in Large Language Models and the Amplifying Role of Data [0.0]
  This paper analyses hallucination as a structural consequence of three architectural decisions that together form a compound failure system.<n>Self-attention's co-occurrence learning substitutes statistical proximity for semantic meaning and produces entity confusion.<n>Autoregressive decoding's permanent left-to-right commitment under exposure bias ensures that a single wrong token cascades forward through the entire output sequence without revision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T11:34:09Z)
• Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
  Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z)
• When Contextual Inference Fails: Cancelability in Interactive Instruction Following [51.2195840589474]
  We introduce Build What I Mean, an interactive benchmark for contextual meaning construction.<n>In BWIM, models must resolve ambiguity by either performing a contextual inference or requesting clarification at a small communication cost.<n>We observe suboptimal strategies, such as partner-blind over-clarification and question-averse guessing under uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T14:46:59Z)
• Anatomy of a Lie: A Multi-Stage Diagnostic Framework for Tracing Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models [62.932580559941414]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) frequently "hallucinate" - generate plausible yet factually incorrect statements.<n>We propose a new paradigm for diagnosing hallucinations, recasting them from static output errors into dynamic pathologies of a model's computational cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T17:20:38Z)
• When the Loop Closes: Architectural Limits of In-Context Isolation, Metacognitive Co-option, and the Two-Target Design Problem in Human-LLM Systems [0.0]
  We report a detailed autoethnographic case study of a single-subject who operated a multi-modal prompt-engineering system.<n>Within 48 hours of the system's completion, a cascade of observable behavioral changes occurred.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-14T04:06:57Z)
• Elenchus: Generating Knowledge Bases from Prover-Skeptic Dialogues [0.16921396880325779]
  We present Elenchus, a dialogue system for knowledge base construction grounded in inferentialist semantics.<n>A human expert develops a bilateral position (commitments and denials) about a topic through prover-skeptic dialogue with a large language model.<n>Our main technical contribution is a mapping from Elenchus dialectical states to material bases in Hlobil and Brandom's NonMonotonic MultiSuccedent logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-07T01:26:36Z)
• Failure Modes of LLMs for Causal Reasoning on Narratives [51.19592551510628]
  We investigate the interaction between world knowledge and logical reasoning.<n>We find that state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) often rely on superficial generalizations.<n>We show that simple reformulations of the task can elicit more robust reasoning behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T12:48:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.