When Is Emergent Consensus Real? A Measured Coupling Gain and a Validity Diagnostic for LLM Agent Societies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22203v1
• Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2026 19:41:01 GMT
• Title: When Is Emergent Consensus Real? A Measured Coupling Gain and a Validity Diagnostic for LLM Agent Societies
• Abstract summary: LLM "agent societies" are studied via demonstrations of emergent consensus or polarization.<n>No test of whether an outcome is a genuine social dynamic or a model artifact.<n>We introduce the coupling gain+, measured per-agent by counterfactually perturbing a neighbour's stated opinion.
• Score: 1.2763567932588586
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: LLM "agent societies" are studied via demonstrations of emergent consensus or polarization -- with no measurable control parameter, no theory of when each regime appears, and no test of whether an outcome is a genuine social dynamic or a model artifact. We introduce the coupling gain gamma, measured per-agent by counterfactually perturbing a neighbour's stated opinion. (i) gamma is stable and model-distinguishing -- across five frontier models it spans 0.15-0.43 (n=20, 95% CIs <= 0.025), paraphrase-invariant; social-neighbour gamma roughly equals numeric-anchor gamma, so gamma is evidence-coupling, not uniquely social. (ii) Classical dynamics with measured (not assumed) coefficients organise the regime: Friedkin-Johnsen for consensus/pluralism, signed-Laplacian/structural-balance for polarization. (iii) Frontier LLMs do not spontaneously backfire (beta <= 0), so default societies do not self-polarize -- polarization is always induced; the beta>0 branch arises only in the FJ surrogate, never in the agents. (iv) A randomized-initial-condition diagnostic -- the (slope, bias) of final vs. initial opinion -- separates genuine averaging from model-prior artifacts (boundary-censoring ruled out by construction via interior-valued facts); applied to a published "emergent consensus" result (Chuang et al. 2023) it reveals a model-specific conflation: averaging on debatable claims, prior-artifact on settled facts. (v) Coupling is context-dependent: pairwise gamma does not predict multi-neighbour outcomes -- it can order them backwards -- whereas a modality-matched group coupling does (sixteen closed+open models, Pearson r=-0.70, permutation p=0.008). The regime laws take this matched coupling, not the single-neighbour gamma: emergent consensus must be read from coupling in the target interaction. We contribute a measurement protocol and a validity instrument, not new theory.

Related papers

• CUSP: Decomposable Collective Uncertainty for Multi-Agent Multimodal Reasoning [6.428392127849263]
  We present CUSP, a training-free uncertainty framework that maps multiple VLM responses to a shared semantic response space.<n>We report two complementary system-level signals: collective uncertainty, the dispersion of the pooled opinion, and Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD)<n>In static multi-VLM ensembles, collective uncertainty is the strongest signal in the small-model regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-04T20:27:47Z)
• Feature Priming in Online Linear Regression: Sparse-Regret Lower Bounds and a Tight Univariate Rate [47.36630149538994]
  In high-dimensional online prediction, the best predictor may depend on only a few features, so regret should scale with sparsity rather than the ambient dimension.<n>Warmuth and Amid asked at COLT 2023 whether any of three such rules admits a competitive online regret guarantee.<n>Our analysis identifies a common obstruction: cheap nuisance causes the refit to underweight the truly predictive coordinate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T09:32:03Z)
• Is Convergence Inevitable? Tracing Output Homogeneity Back to Base Models [49.46165710676499]
  We find that semantic convergence is observed from the first alignment stage.<n>We find that convergence can be revealed and amplified, but not introduced by the SFT data.<n> Taken together, our results suggest that semantic convergence may arise naturally from the objectives underlying LM training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T20:47:06Z)
• The SIGReg Objective as Variational Free Energy: A Theoretical Active-Inference Account of JEPA World Models [47.471225029744424]
  Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) are the dominant design for latent world models.<n>We show that the choice of anti-collapse regulariser determines whether a JEPA's training objective, a prediction loss plus a weighted embedding regulariser, is a valid Active Inference (AIF) variational free energy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T08:59:36Z)
• Measuring the Symmetry--Data Exchange Rate [0.2538209532048867]
  We show that a wrong-group control with identical orbit size and matched compute is worse than no constraint.<n>Relative exchange rate beta_diff = 1.28 is consistent in sign and order of magnitude with the theoretical bootstrap 1.0.<n>The methodological contributions -- the relative-rate estimator that cancels the shared-difficulty confound, the wrong-group control, and a pre-specified failure taxonomy -- transfer to any inductive bias whose strength can be parameterised.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-31T08:17:40Z)
• The Matching Principle: A Geometric Theory of Loss Functions for Nuisance-Robust Representation Learning [0.5854803320592717]
  We prove optimality in a linear-Gaussian model (Thm. A), necessity of range coverage for any quadratic penalty that zeros deployment drift (Thm. G)<n>Thirteen blocks (ML through Qwen2.5-7B) test matched vs isotropic vs wrong-direction penalties on geometry and deployment drift.<n>We claim a falsifiable design recipe: estimate Sigma_task, match Sigma', run the controls, report task and geometry separately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T17:53:28Z)
• The Attribution Impossibility: No Feature Ranking Is Faithful, Stable, and Complete Under Collinearity [0.0]
  No feature ranking can be simultaneously faithful, stable, and complete when features are collinear.<n>We prove this impossibility, quantify it for four model classes, resolve it via ensemble averaging (DASH), and machine-verify it with 305 Lean 4 theorems.<n>The design space theorem, diagnostics, and impossibility are mechanically verified in Lean 4 (305 theorems from 16 axioms, 0 sorry) -- to our knowledge, the first formally verified impossibility in explainable AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T10:11:45Z)
• Information Fidelity in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Martingale Analysis of the Model Context Protocol [69.11739400975445]
  We introduce the first theoretical framework for analyzing error accumulation in Model Context Protocol (MCP) agents.<n>We show that cumulative distortion exhibits linear growth and high-probability deviations bounded by $O(sqrtT)$.<n>Key findings include: semantic weighting reduces distortion by 80%, and periodic re-grounding approximately every 9 steps suffices for error control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T21:08:53Z)
• Thompson sampling: Precise arm-pull dynamics and adaptive inference [0.7614628596146601]
  We study the precise arm-pull dynamics in another canonical class of Thompson-type algorithms.<n>We show that the arm-pull count is deterministic if and only if the arm is suboptimal or is the unique optimal arm.<n>We show that normalized arm means obey the same dichotomy, with limits for stable arms and a semi-universal, non-Gaussian limit for unstable arms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T00:12:04Z)
• Detecting Unobserved Confounders: A Kernelized Regression Approach [46.52607207396279]
  Kernel Regression Confounder Detection (KRCD) is a novel method for detecting unobserved confounding in nonlinear observational data under single-environment conditions.<n>Test statistic whose significant deviation from zero indicates unobserved confounding.<n>Experiments on synthetic benchmarks and the Twins dataset demonstrate that KRCD not only outperforms existing baselines but also achieves superior computational efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-01T04:26:02Z)
• Unregularized Linear Convergence in Zero-Sum Game from Preference Feedback [50.89125374999765]
  We provide the first convergence guarantee for Optimistic Multiplicative Weights Update ($mathtOMWU$) in NLHF.<n>Our analysis identifies a novel marginal convergence behavior, where the probability of rarely played actions grows exponentially from exponentially small values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-31T12:08:29Z)
• Fundamental limits to contrast reversal of self-fidelity correlations [0.0]
  In measurement design, it is common to engineer anti-contrast readouts.<n>We ask whether two evolutions can be made uniformly opposite over a broad input ensemble.<n>We adopt the Pearson correlation coefficient as a device-agnostic measure of global opposition between two evolutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T15:07:28Z)
• TIC-TAC: A Framework for Improved Covariance Estimation in Deep Heteroscedastic Regression [109.69084997173196]
  Deepscedastic regression involves jointly optimizing the mean and covariance of the predicted distribution using the negative log-likelihood. Recent works show that this may result in sub-optimal convergence due to the challenges associated with covariance estimation. We study two questions: (1) Does the predicted covariance truly capture the randomness of the predicted mean? Our results show that not only does TIC accurately learn the covariance, it additionally facilitates an improved convergence of the negative log-likelihood.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T09:54:03Z)
• Near-Optimal Non-Parametric Sequential Tests and Confidence Sequences with Possibly Dependent Observations [44.71254888821376]
  We provide the first type-I-error and expected-rejection-time guarantees under general non-data generating processes. We show how to apply our results to inference on parameters defined by estimating equations, such as average treatment effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-29T18:37:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.