Evaluating Large Language Models for Hausa and Fongbe Machine Translation: Benchmarks, Failures, and Metric Reliability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22269v1
• Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2026 23:23:54 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Large Language Models for Hausa and Fongbe Machine Translation: Benchmarks, Failures, and Metric Reliability
• Abstract summary: We investigate the translation quality of current large language models (LLMs) for English-to-Hausa and English-to-Fongbe.<n>We evaluate whether standard automatic metrics reliably reflect human judgment for these low-resource languages.
• Score: 12.074798555934855
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We investigate the translation quality of current large language models (LLMs) for English-to-Hausa and English-to-Fongbe - two typologically distinct West African languages from the Afroasiatic and Niger-Congo families respectively - and evaluate whether standard automatic metrics reliably reflect human judgment for these low-resource languages. We evaluate four models (GPT-4o Mini, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and Qwen2.5-7B) at progressive scales (500 to 10,000 sentences) using automatic metrics (BLEU, chrF++, TER, COMET, BERTScore) validated against native-speaker judgment. Our results reveal three key findings. First, translation quality varies substantially by language: Hausa achieves acceptable quality (human scores 4.0-4.5/5) while Fongbe achieves poor quality (1.0-2.2/5), with a consistent 3x BLEU gap across all systems. Second, model rankings differ by language - Gemini leads for Fongbe while GPT-4o leads for Hausa by human evaluation - indicating that performance on one low-resource African language does not predict performance on another. Third, metric-human correlation varies dramatically: perfect rank correlation for Fongbe (rho=1.0) but weak correlation for Hausa (rho=0.5), where human evaluators preferred GPT-4o despite all automatic metrics ranking Claude first. We further show that neural metrics like BERTScore exhibit embedding collapse (within-language similarity >0.99) for both languages, limiting their ability to differentiate translation quality. Based on these findings, we recommend multi-metric evaluation for low-resource African languages, with particular caution when interpreting neural metrics. We establish that minimum sample sizes of n=2,500 sentences are required for stable system rankings, as smaller samples produced artifact findings that reversed at scale.

Related papers

• EviSI: An Evidence-Based Evaluation Agent for Simultaneous Interpreting [15.392286631815763]
  EviSI is a large language model evaluation agent combining Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) with criteria developed with professional interpreters.<n>On human-rated English to Chinese and Chinese to English data, EviSI recovers the aggregate English to Chinese human system ranking.<n>A multilingual extension to five directions without human ratings retains the dimensions and scoring rule, showing positive system ranking correlations with COMET throughout.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-08T03:00:11Z)
• Benchmarking Speech-to-Speech Translation Models [55.00303727199927]
  Speech-to-speech translation (S2ST) has advanced rapidly, but offline evaluation lacks a unified protocol.<n>We introduce a benchmarking framework integrating 46 metrics across eight dimensions.<n>We deploy it on 1,248 model-language configurations from FLEURS and CVSS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T07:01:33Z)
• Evaluating Extremely Low-Resource Machine Translation: A Comparative Study of ChrF++ and BLEU Metrics [69.2321983942375]
  This work presents a comparative analysis of BLEU, an n-gram-based metric, and ChrF++, a character-based metric, for MT evaluation in ELRL settings.<n>We examine how each metric responds to translation artifacts, including hallucinations, repetition, source-text copying, and diacritic (textitmatra) variations across three ELRLs: Magahi, Bhojpuri, and Chhattisgarhi.<n>While recent work often relies solely on ChrF++, our findings show that BLEU, despite its lower absolute scores, provides complementary lexical-precision insights that improve interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T14:56:42Z)
• Can Embedding Similarity Predict Cross-Lingual Transfer? A Systematic Study on African Languages [12.074798555934855]
  Cross-lingual transfer is essential for building NLP systems for low-resource African languages.<n>We systematically evaluate five embedding similarity metrics across 816 transfer experiments.<n>We find that cosine gap and retrieval-based metrics reliably predict transfer success.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T16:39:28Z)
• How Good is Zero-Shot MT Evaluation for Low Resource Indian Languages? [35.368257850926184]
  We focus on a zero-shot evaluation setting focusing on low-resource Indian languages, namely Assamese, Kannada, Maithili, and Punjabi. We observe that even for learned metrics, which are known to exhibit zero-shot performance, the Kendall Tau and Pearson correlations with human annotations are only as high as 0.32 and 0.45.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T09:28:08Z)
• An Empirical Study on the Robustness of Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation [40.08063412966712]
  Massively multilingual neural machine translation (MMNMT) has been proven to enhance the translation quality of low-resource languages. We create a robustness evaluation benchmark dataset for Indonesian-Chinese translation. This dataset is automatically translated into Chinese using four NLLB-200 models of different sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T12:01:54Z)
• Machine Translation for Ge'ez Language [0.0]
  Machine translation for low-resource languages such as Ge'ez faces challenges such as out-of-vocabulary words, domain mismatches, and lack of labeled training data. We develop a multilingual neural machine translation (MNMT) model based on languages relatedness. We also experiment with using GPT-3.5, a state-of-the-art LLM, for few-shot translation with fuzzy matches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-24T14:55:23Z)
• Towards Multiple References Era -- Addressing Data Leakage and Limited Reference Diversity in NLG Evaluation [55.92852268168816]
  N-gram matching-based evaluation metrics, such as BLEU and chrF, are widely utilized across a range of natural language generation (NLG) tasks. Recent studies have revealed a weak correlation between these matching-based metrics and human evaluations. We propose to utilize textitmultiple references to enhance the consistency between these metrics and human evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T14:49:26Z)
• INSTRUCTSCORE: Explainable Text Generation Evaluation with Finegrained Feedback [80.57617091714448]
  We present InstructScore, an explainable evaluation metric for text generation. We fine-tune a text evaluation metric based on LLaMA, producing a score for generated text and a human readable diagnostic report.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:27:22Z)
• No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translation [69.28110770760506]
  We create datasets and models aimed at narrowing the performance gap between low and high-resource languages. We propose multiple architectural and training improvements to counteract overfitting while training on thousands of tasks. Our model achieves an improvement of 44% BLEU relative to the previous state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-11T07:33:36Z)
• OneAligner: Zero-shot Cross-lingual Transfer with One Rich-Resource Language Pair for Low-Resource Sentence Retrieval [91.76575626229824]
  We present OneAligner, an alignment model specially designed for sentence retrieval tasks. When trained with all language pairs of a large-scale parallel multilingual corpus (OPUS-100), this model achieves the state-of-the-art result. We conclude through empirical results and analyses that the performance of the sentence alignment task depends mostly on the monolingual and parallel data size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-17T19:52:42Z)
• ChrEnTranslate: Cherokee-English Machine Translation Demo with Quality Estimation and Corrective Feedback [70.5469946314539]
  ChrEnTranslate is an online machine translation demonstration system for translation between English and an endangered language Cherokee. It supports both statistical and neural translation models as well as provides quality estimation to inform users of reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-30T17:58:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.