The Unseen Hand: Manipulating Model Fairness and SHAP with Targeted Identity Re-Association Attacks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22858v1
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 05:05:36 GMT
- Title: The Unseen Hand: Manipulating Model Fairness and SHAP with Targeted Identity Re-Association Attacks
- Abstract summary: We introduce Targeted Identity Re-Association (TIRA) attacks, a novel family of attacks that manipulate a model's outputs without requiring access to the model's internals or feature representations.<n>We empirically demonstrate that TIRA attacks are highly effective at pushing fairness metrics towards ideal values. Crucially, TIRA attacks successfully confound SHAP-based explanations, leaving effectively zero residual attribution for protected features, a major improvement over prior work.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As machine learning models grow more influential and opaque, algorithmic fairness and explainability are critical for ensuring accountability. However, we demonstrate that these auditing mechanisms are themselves vulnerable to subtle manipulation, camouflaging the influence of protected features. While prior work on data-agnostic attacks has exposed this vulnerability, they leave behind detectable artifacts that compromise their stealth. We introduce Targeted Identity Re-Association (TIRA) attacks, a novel family of attacks that iteratively and probabilistically manipulate a model's outputs without requiring access to the model's internals or feature representations. We formalize two algorithms: Probabilistic Micro-Shuffling (PMiS), which applies localized adjacent swaps, and Probabilistic Rank-Shift Micro-Perturbation (PRSMP), which introduces small, randomized rank shifts. We empirically demonstrate that TIRA attacks are highly effective at pushing fairness metrics towards ideal values. Crucially, TIRA attacks successfully confound SHAP-based explanations, leaving effectively zero residual attribution for protected features, a major improvement over prior work.
Related papers
- Sleeper Cell: Injecting Latent Malice Temporal Backdoors into Tool-Using LLMs [0.0]
Openweight Large Language Models (LLMs) have democratized agentic AI, yet finetuned weights are frequently shared and adopted with limited scrutiny beyond leaderboard performance.<n>This creates a risk where third-party models are incorporated without strong behavioral guarantees.<n>We show that poisoned models maintain state-of-the-art performance on benign tasks, incentivizing their adoption.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T22:01:08Z) - SWAP: Towards Copyright Auditing of Soft Prompts via Sequential Watermarking [58.475471437150674]
We propose sequential watermarking for soft prompts (SWAP)<n>SWAP encodes watermarks through a specific order of defender-specified out-of-distribution classes.<n>Experiments on 11 datasets demonstrate SWAP's effectiveness, harmlessness, and robustness against potential adaptive attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-05T13:48:48Z) - DiffuGuard: How Intrinsic Safety is Lost and Found in Diffusion Large Language Models [50.21378052667732]
We conduct an in-depth analysis of dLLM vulnerabilities to jailbreak attacks across two distinct dimensions: intra-step and inter-step dynamics.<n>We propose DiffuGuard, a training-free defense framework that addresses vulnerabilities through a dual-stage approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T05:17:10Z) - Embedding Poisoning: Bypassing Safety Alignment via Embedding Semantic Shift [23.0914017433021]
This work identifies a novel class of deployment phase attacks that exploit a vulnerability by injecting imperceptible perturbations directly into the embedding layer outputs without modifying model weights or input text.<n>We propose Search based Embedding Poisoning, a practical, model agnostic framework that introduces carefully optimized perturbations into embeddings associated with high risk tokens.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T05:00:58Z) - The Surprising Effectiveness of Membership Inference with Simple N-Gram Coverage [71.8564105095189]
We introduce N-Gram Coverage Attack, a membership inference attack that relies solely on text outputs from the target model.<n>We first demonstrate on a diverse set of existing benchmarks that N-Gram Coverage Attack outperforms other black-box methods.<n>We find that more recent models, such as GPT-4o, exhibit increased robustness to membership inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-13T08:35:16Z) - Explainer-guided Targeted Adversarial Attacks against Binary Code Similarity Detection Models [12.524811181751577]
We propose a novel optimization for adversarial attacks against BCSD models.<n>In particular, we aim to improve the attacks in a challenging scenario, where the attack goal is to limit the model predictions to a specific range.<n>Our attack leverages the superior capability of black-box, model-agnostic explainers in interpreting the model decision boundaries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T08:29:19Z) - MISLEADER: Defending against Model Extraction with Ensembles of Distilled Models [56.09354775405601]
Model extraction attacks aim to replicate the functionality of a black-box model through query access.<n>Most existing defenses presume that attacker queries have out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, enabling them to detect and disrupt suspicious inputs.<n>We propose MISLEADER, a novel defense strategy that does not rely on OOD assumptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T01:37:09Z) - Variance-Based Defense Against Blended Backdoor Attacks [0.0]
Backdoor attacks represent a subtle yet effective class of cyberattacks targeting AI models.<n>We propose a novel defense method that trains a model on the given dataset, detects poisoned classes, and extracts the critical part of the attack trigger.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T09:01:35Z) - Transferable Adversarial Attacks on SAM and Its Downstream Models [87.23908485521439]
This paper explores the feasibility of adversarial attacking various downstream models fine-tuned from the segment anything model (SAM)<n>To enhance the effectiveness of the adversarial attack towards models fine-tuned on unknown datasets, we propose a universal meta-initialization (UMI) algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-26T15:04:04Z) - The Adversarial Implications of Variable-Time Inference [47.44631666803983]
We present an approach that exploits a novel side channel in which the adversary simply measures the execution time of the algorithm used to post-process the predictions of the ML model under attack.
We investigate leakage from the non-maximum suppression (NMS) algorithm, which plays a crucial role in the operation of object detectors.
We demonstrate attacks against the YOLOv3 detector, leveraging the timing leakage to successfully evade object detection using adversarial examples, and perform dataset inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-05T11:53:17Z) - On the Alignment of Group Fairness with Attribute Privacy [1.6574413179773757]
Group fairness and privacy are fundamental aspects in designing trustworthy machine learning models.
We are the first to demonstrate the alignment of group fairness with the specific privacy notion of attribute privacy in a blackbox setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-18T13:00:34Z) - RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing Utility [68.48117818874155]
We propose a novel training framework based on a relaxed loss with a more achievable learning target.
RelaxLoss is applicable to any classification model with added benefits of easy implementation and negligible overhead.
Our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art defense mechanisms in terms of resilience against MIAs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-12T19:34:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.