Cognitive Digital Twins: Ethical Risks and Governance for AI Systems That Model the Mind

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23094v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 09:40:09 GMT
• Title: Cognitive Digital Twins: Ethical Risks and Governance for AI Systems That Model the Mind
• Abstract summary: We call cognitive digital twins (CDTs) a class of technologies that we call cognitive digital twins (CDTs)<n>CDTs combine cognitive inference with longitudinal representation, simulation, and proxy action.<n>We introduce a 5A governance framework organized around authority, autonomy, access and control, accountability, and availability.<n>We propose requirements for high-risk CDTs that strengthen consent, purpose limitation, validity, traceability, contestation, independent review, and model retirement.
• Score: 12.629706595738755
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As AI systems become increasingly persistent and personalized, they make possible a class of technologies that we call cognitive digital twins (CDTs): dynamic computational representations of a specific person's cognition, updated from behavioral, contextual, or physiological data in order to model, predict, or simulate that person's cognition, or to act as that person's communicative or decision-making proxy. CDTs combine cognitive inference with longitudinal representation, simulation, and proxy action in ways that existing governance strategies for personal assistants, autonomous agents, recommender systems, and automated decision systems only partially address. This paper makes four contributions. First, we define CDTs and distinguish them from adjacent systems. Second, we introduce a 5A governance framework organized around authority, autonomy, access and control, accountability, and availability. Third, we identify CDT-specific risks, from misrepresentation and epistemic authority shifts to shadow twins, simulated participation, proxy action, and proxy-power asymmetries. Fourth, we analyze governance gaps and propose requirements for high-risk CDTs that strengthen consent, purpose limitation, validity, traceability, contestation, independent review, and model retirement. Existing frameworks primarily regulate data processing, automated decisions, or autonomous actions; CDTs also require governance at the level of cognitive representation itself, before any final decision or external action occurs. We argue that CDTs require governance not only because they can act for people, but because they can become infrastructures through which cognition is represented, simulated, classified, and operationalized.

Related papers

• Neuro-Symbolic Participation Governance for Verifiable AI Agents in Open Digital Twin Ecosystems [12.774828297549467]
  Existing multi-agent systems often lack robust verification for identity, capability, and policy compliance.<n>This paper proposes a neuro-symbolic decentralized governance framework for verifiable agents in collaborative digital twin environments.<n>Our findings suggest that neuro-symbolic decentralized governance provides a scalable and trustworthy pathway for safe human-machine collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-02T02:30:32Z)
• A Diagnostic Framework for AI Agent Behavior [2.7491881437593553]
  This Perspective proposes a diagnostic framework for AI agent behavior: layer attribution.<n>The framework clarifies three consequences: surrogate validity is a model-task-layer relation, human-AI divergence provides diagnostic evidence, and governance requires source attribution before intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-19T09:14:27Z)
• Governing Actions, Not Agents: Institutional Attestation as a Governance Model for Autonomous AI Systems [0.0]
  Human institutions have governed powerful autonomous actors by requiring independently attested evidence at the point of consequential action.<n>We formalise this institutional pattern as a computational governance model for AI agent systems.<n>Under the proposed model, an agent retains full autonomy over planning and reasoning but holds no execution authority over designated high-risk actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-24T18:43:00Z)
• Is Decentralized AI Governable? From Regulative Policy to Constitutive Protocol [1.5755923640031846]
  We analyze DeAI as a six-layer decentralizing stack.<n>We argue for a shift in the locus of governance from policy to protocol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T12:09:56Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
  We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z)
• The Digital Gorilla: Rebalancing Power in the Age of AI [0.0]
  Article offers a conceptual foundation for AI governance by treating such systems as a fourth societal actor.<n>It develops a Four Societal Actors framework that maps how power flows among these actors across five power modalities.<n>It advances a federalized, polycentric governance architecture and institutionalizes dynamic checks and balances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T17:46:54Z)
• Agentic AI for Cybersecurity: A Meta-Cognitive Architecture for Governable Autonomy [0.0]
  This paper argues that cybersecurity orchestration should be reconceptualized as an agentic, multi-agent cognitive system.<n>We introduce a conceptual framework in which heterogeneous AI agents responsible for detection, hypothesis formation, contextual interpretation, explanation, and governance are coordinated through an explicit meta-cognitive judgement function.<n>Our contribution is to make this cognitive structure architecturally explicit and governable by embedding meta-cognitive judgement as a first-class system function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T12:52:49Z)
• Digital Twin AI: Opportunities and Challenges from Large Language Models to World Models [95.9909582708447]
  Digital twins, as precise digital representations of physical systems, have evolved from passive simulation tools into intelligent and autonomous entities.<n>This paper presents a unified four-stage framework that characterizes AI integration across the digital twin lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-04T01:17:09Z)
• AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
  This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
• Generative AI for Autonomous Driving: Frontiers and Opportunities [145.6465312554513]
  This survey delivers a comprehensive synthesis of the emerging role of GenAI across the autonomous driving stack.<n>We begin by distilling the principles and trade-offs of modern generative modeling, encompassing VAEs, GANs, Diffusion Models, and Large Language Models.<n>We categorize practical applications, such as synthetic data generalization, end-to-end driving strategies, high-fidelity digital twin systems, smart transportation networks, and cross-domain transfer to embodied AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T17:59:20Z)
• LOKA Protocol: A Decentralized Framework for Trustworthy and Ethical AI Agent Ecosystems [0.0]
  We present the novel LOKA Protocol (Layered Orchestration for Knowledgeful Agents), a unified, systems-level architecture for building ethically governed, interoperable AI agent ecosystems.<n>LOKA introduces a proposed Universal Agent Identity Layer (UAIL) for decentralized, verifiable identity; intent-centric communication protocols for semantic coordination across diverse agents; and a Decentralized Ethical Consensus Protocol (DECP) that could enable agents to make context-aware decisions grounded in shared ethical baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T06:51:35Z)
• Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
  We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks. We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z)
• Causal Semantic Communication for Digital Twins: A Generalizable Imitation Learning Approach [74.25870052841226]
  A digital twin (DT) leverages a virtual representation of the physical world, along with communication (e.g., 6G), computing, and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to enable many connected intelligence services. Wireless systems can exploit the paradigm of semantic communication (SC) for facilitating informed decision-making under strict communication constraints. A novel framework called causal semantic communication (CSC) is proposed for DT-based wireless systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T00:15:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.