A Diagnostic Framework for AI Agent Behavior

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17149v1
• Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 09:14:27 GMT
• Title: A Diagnostic Framework for AI Agent Behavior
• Abstract summary: This Perspective proposes a diagnostic framework for AI agent behavior: layer attribution.<n>The framework clarifies three consequences: surrogate validity is a model-task-layer relation, human-AI divergence provides diagnostic evidence, and governance requires source attribution before intervention.
• Score: 2.7491881437593553
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: AI agents increasingly act within the same clinical, political, scientific, and social systems that behavioral scientists study. Evaluating these systems requires source-level diagnosis: the same behavioral pattern may arise from an agent representational substrate or from the roles, objectives, interaction structures, and governance rules that shape its expression. This Perspective proposes a diagnostic framework for AI agent behavior: layer attribution. The foundational computational layer defines what behaviors are possible through architecture, memory, perception, attention, and representation. The behavioral modulation layer shapes how those capacities are expressed through identity, resources, objectives, social interaction, institutional constraints, and governance. The framework clarifies three consequences: surrogate validity is a model-task-layer relation, human-AI divergence provides diagnostic evidence, and governance requires source attribution before intervention. Treating AI agents as behavioral actors therefore requires evaluation methods that determine where behavior originates before deciding how to explain, validate, or govern it.

Related papers

• Rethinking Penetration Testing for AI-Enabled Systems: From Resource Compromise to Behavioral Objective Violation [0.0]
  Penetration testing traditionally evaluates whether adversaries can exploit weaknesses in software, infrastructure, configurations, or operational controls to achieve security-relevant compromise.<n>This paper reframes penetration testing for AI-enabled systems as objective-driven behavioral evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T16:36:54Z)
• How to Interpret Agent Behavior [56.59836196946289]
  We introduce ACT*ONOMY, a taxonomy for describing and analyzing agent behavior at runtime.<n>By providing a shared vocabulary, ACT*ONOMY helps researchers, agent designers, and end users interpret agent behavior more consistently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T14:52:40Z)
• Caring Without Feeling: Affective Dynamics as the Control Layer of Human-AI Agent Collaboration [28.35417287973668]
  No integrated account explains how affective cues operate within agentic collaboration.<n>We trace how model-generated affective signals enter interaction loops that govern reliance, repair and oversight.<n>We propose a framework that treats affect not as an internal property of AI but as a coordination layer through which humans and agents negotiate capability, uncertainty and responsibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T05:10:38Z)
• Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models [122.81018455095999]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, but struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments.<n>Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T18:58:23Z)
• AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
  This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
• The Agent Behavior: Model, Governance and Challenges in the AI Digital Age [13.689486430780518]
  Advancements in AI have led to agents in networked environments increasingly mirroring human behavior.<n>This paper proposes the "Network Behavior Lifecycle" model, which divides network behavior into 6 stages and systematically analyzes the behavioral differences between humans and agents at each stage.<n>The paper further introduces the "Agent for Agent (A4A)" paradigm and the "Human-Agent Behavioral Disparity (HABD)" model, which examine the fundamental distinctions between human and agent behaviors across 5 dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T04:24:55Z)
• AI Agent Behavioral Science [29.262537008412412]
  AI Agent Behavioral Science focuses on the systematic observation of behavior, design of interventions to test hypotheses, and theory-guided interpretation of how AI agents act, adapt, and interact over time.<n>We systematize a growing body of research across individual agent, multi-agent, and human-agent interaction settings, and demonstrate how this perspective informs responsible AI by treating fairness, safety, interpretability, accountability, and privacy as behavioral properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T08:12:32Z)
• Toward a Theory of Agents as Tool-Use Decision-Makers [89.26889709510242]
  We argue that true autonomy requires agents to be grounded in a coherent epistemic framework that governs what they know, what they need to know, and how to acquire that knowledge efficiently.<n>We propose a unified theory that treats internal reasoning and external actions as equivalent epistemic tools, enabling agents to systematically coordinate introspection and interaction.<n>This perspective shifts the design of agents from mere action executors to knowledge-driven intelligence systems, offering a principled path toward building foundation agents capable of adaptive, efficient, and goal-directed behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T07:52:16Z)
• Causal Responsibility Attribution for Human-AI Collaboration [62.474732677086855]
  This paper presents a causal framework using Structural Causal Models (SCMs) to systematically attribute responsibility in human-AI systems. Two case studies illustrate the framework's adaptability in diverse human-AI collaboration scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T17:17:45Z)
• Pangu-Agent: A Fine-Tunable Generalist Agent with Structured Reasoning [50.47568731994238]
  Key method for creating Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents is Reinforcement Learning (RL) This paper presents a general framework model for integrating and learning structured reasoning into AI agents' policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T17:57:57Z)
• Modelling Behaviour Change using Cognitive Agent Simulations [0.0]
  This paper presents work-in-progress research to apply selected behaviour change theories to simulated agents. The research is focusing on complex agent architectures required for self-determined goal achievement in adverse circumstances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-16T19:19:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.