Federated Survival Analysis in Healthcare: A Multi-Model Evaluation on Cross-Institutional Heterogeneous Breast Cancer Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23871v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 19:14:51 GMT
• Title: Federated Survival Analysis in Healthcare: A Multi-Model Evaluation on Cross-Institutional Heterogeneous Breast Cancer Data
• Abstract summary: Federated learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving alternative by training shared models without exchanging raw data.<n>Three survival models, the Cox Proportional Hazards model, DeepSurv, and Random Survival Forest (RSF), are compared across centralized, local, and federated training.<n>We derive practical, decision-oriented guidelines mapping data, privacy, interpretability, and resource constraints to recommended model and training-paradigm choices.
• Score: 0.6480963852869791
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Survival analysis is central to clinical decision-making, yet reliable time-to-event models require large, diverse cohorts that are rarely available at a single institution, while privacy regulations restrict the centralization of patient data. Federated learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving alternative by training shared models without exchanging raw data, but its effectiveness for survival modeling under realistic, heterogeneous conditions remains insufficiently understood. This paper presents a systematic, multi-model evaluation of federated survival analysis on a cross-institutional breast cancer cohort with naturally heterogeneous distributed clients. Three representative survival models, the Cox Proportional Hazards model, DeepSurv, and Random Survival Forest (RSF), are compared across centralized, local, and federated training, and three federated optimization strategies (FedAvg, FedProx, and FedAdam) are assessed for the gradient-based models. Results show that FL consistently outperforms local training and approaches, and occasionally exceeds, centralized performance, while RSF offers the best overall balance of discrimination, calibration, and robustness across heterogeneous clients. We further find that performance depends on the diversity of client distributions, and that FedAvg and FedProx are stronger and more stable than FedAdam. Based on these findings, we derive practical, decision-oriented guidelines mapping data, privacy, interpretability, and resource constraints to recommended model and training-paradigm choices for federated survival modeling in healthcare.

Related papers

• Dementia Etiology Diagnosis via Collaborative Meta Knowledge Enhancement [81.27196033392559]
  We propose a Collaborative Meta Knowledge Enhancement (COME) framework for dementia etiology diagnosis.<n>COME injects multi-center acquisition semantics, source identifiers, and modality indicators as heterogeneity-aware embeddings into a unified Transformer architecture for scale-up training.<n>Our method achieves state-of-the-art in-domain performance with a mean macro-averaged AUC of 85.62% and a 4.29-point gain over the strongest baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-24T04:26:47Z)
• Federated Learning for Multi-Center Sepsis Early Prediction with Privacy-Preserving [9.744444068585983]
  Federated learning allows multiple institutions to jointly train predictive models without directly sharing or centralizing raw data.<n>This study systematically examines the application of federated learning to multi-center sepsis prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T01:35:17Z)
• Cerebra: A Multidisciplinary AI Board for Multimodal Dementia Characterization and Risk Assessment [56.62016795093786]
  Cerebra is an interactive multi-agent AI team that coordinates specialized agents for EHR, clinical notes, and medical imaging analysis.<n>It supports privacy-preserving deployment by operating on structured representations and remains robust when modalities are incomplete.<n>Cerebra significantly improved expert performance, increasing accuracy by 17.5 percentage points in prospective dementia risk estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T05:46:45Z)
• A Robust Pipeline for Differentially Private Federated Learning on Imbalanced Clinical Data using SMOTETomek and FedProx [0.0]
  Federated Learning (FL) presents a groundbreaking approach for collaborative health research.<n>FL offers formal security guarantees when combined with Differential Privacy (DP)<n>An optimal operational region was identified on the privacy-utility frontier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T20:47:50Z)
• Adaptable Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction from Heterogeneous Data using Large Language Models [70.64969663547703]
  AdaCVD is an adaptable CVD risk prediction framework built on large language models extensively fine-tuned on over half a million participants from the UK Biobank.<n>It addresses key clinical challenges across three dimensions: it flexibly incorporates comprehensive yet variable patient information; it seamlessly integrates both structured data and unstructured text; and it rapidly adapts to new patient populations using minimal additional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T14:42:02Z)
• Addressing Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning of Cox Proportional Hazards Models [8.798959872821962]
  This paper outlines an approach in the domain of federated survival analysis, specifically the Cox Proportional Hazards (CoxPH) model. We present an FL approach that employs feature-based clustering to enhance model accuracy across synthetic datasets and real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T18:34:20Z)
• FedPseudo: Pseudo value-based Deep Learning Models for Federated Survival Analysis [9.659041001051415]
  We propose a first-of-its-kind, pseudo value-based deep learning model for federated survival analysis called FedPseudo. Our proposed FL framework achieves similar performance as the best centrally trained deep survival analysis model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T01:10:36Z)
• Decentralized Distributed Learning with Privacy-Preserving Data Synthesis [9.276097219140073]
  In the medical field, multi-center collaborations are often sought to yield more generalizable findings by leveraging the heterogeneity of patient and clinical data. Recent privacy regulations hinder the possibility to share data, and consequently, to come up with machine learning-based solutions that support diagnosis and prognosis. We present a decentralized distributed method that integrates features from local nodes, providing models able to generalize across multiple datasets while maintaining privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T23:49:38Z)
• Practical Challenges in Differentially-Private Federated Survival Analysis of Medical Data [57.19441629270029]
  In this paper, we take advantage of the inherent properties of neural networks to federate the process of training of survival analysis models. In the realistic setting of small medical datasets and only a few data centers, this noise makes it harder for the models to converge. We propose DPFed-post which adds a post-processing stage to the private federated learning scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T10:03:24Z)
• Advancing COVID-19 Diagnosis with Privacy-Preserving Collaboration in Artificial Intelligence [79.038671794961]
  We launch the Unified CT-COVID AI Diagnostic Initiative (UCADI), where the AI model can be distributedly trained and independently executed at each host institution. Our study is based on 9,573 chest computed tomography scans (CTs) from 3,336 patients collected from 23 hospitals located in China and the UK.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-18T00:43:41Z)
• Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
  This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model. We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data. Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.