The Gentle Collapse: Distributional Metrics for Continual Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.25165v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 20:53:06 GMT
• Title: The Gentle Collapse: Distributional Metrics for Continual Learning
• Abstract summary: We introduce six softmax-derived metrics spanning true-label rank (TLR), predictive confidence, and distributional divergence that characterize forgetting continuously.<n>On CIFAR-100, these metrics carry information where accuracy does not: at 0% accuracy, the Confusion Margin spans an IQR of [0.32, 0.50] across classes that accuracy treats identically.<n>Per-sample metric scores used as loss weights reduce forgetting by 1.3 percentage points over uniform experience replay (ER) on CIFAR-100.
• Score: 7.30570760963699
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Accuracy degradation is the standard metric for Catastrophic Forgetting (CF), however, it records only whether forgetting occurred or not. It saturates at the extremes and collapses discretely at task boundaries, hiding the internal structure of what is being forgotten. We introduce six softmax-derived metrics spanning true-label rank (TLR), predictive confidence, and distributional divergence that characterize forgetting continuously, each normalized to [0, 1] with no modification to training. On CIFAR-100, these metrics carry information where accuracy does not: at 0% accuracy, the Confusion Margin spans an IQR of [0.32, 0.50] across classes that accuracy treats identically. We demonstrate that this richer signal is actionable in mitigating catastrophic forgetting. Per-sample metric scores used as loss weights reduce forgetting by 1.3 percentage points over uniform experience replay (ER) on CIFAR-100. Furthermore, the slope of a metric over a small window provides a stable sampling criterion: at a small-window size (e.g. 3 epochs), accuracy-trend degrades to 34.79% (std. = 2.32) while log-TLR achieves 41.07% (std. = 0.57). This gap is structural since reliable small-window trend estimation requires a continuous signal. On TinyImageNet, log-TLR trend sampling reduces forgetting by 7.7 percentage points over the ER baseline.

Related papers

• Not All Relations Are Equal: Relation-Balanced and Calibrated Graph Learning for Provenance-Based Intrusion Detection [66.44527094471619]
  We present RECAL, an unsupervised framework using relation-balanced masked graph learning to better capture rare interaction patterns.<n>On three DARPA E3 datasets, RECAL achieves F1 scores of 99.99%, 99.93%, and 99.99%, outperforming the best baseline on each dataset by 0.88, 0.82, and 0.42 percentage points, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-15T00:31:01Z)
• Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2 [0.0]
  Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model.<n>This paper presents a benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-10T00:53:20Z)
• LLM Doesn't Know What It Doesn't Know: Detecting Epistemic Blind Spots via Cross-Model Attribution Divergence on Clinical Tabular Data [2.1443570696048906]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to structured clinical data.<n>We compare Qwen 2.5 7B and XGBoost on a prediction task via attribution divergence analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T18:49:44Z)
• Beyond ROC-AUC: Operating-Point Performance Reporting for Biometric Verification [0.0]
  A biometric verifier is often deployed with a strict false match budget, so only a narrow, low false match rate (FMR) slice of the score range is used.<n>In practice, a single area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) is still reported as the resolution.<n>A system that looks stronger on full ROC-AUC is shown to be significantly worse at FMR = 10-3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-13T15:28:54Z)
• Beyond Inference-Only Deployment: Comparing Weight-Based Consolidation Against Cascading Compaction [1.6214121783846343]
  We evaluate a nightly consolidation of interaction knowledge into model weights via synthesis, synthesis, and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning on a single consumer.<n>Across ten realistic software development conversations, cascading compaction retain 36.8 +/- 3.0% of knowledge.<n>LoRA consolidates interaction knowledge into model weights via synthesis, synthesis, and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning on a single consumer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T16:57:25Z)
• Clipping Bottleneck: Stabilizing RLVR via Stochastic Recovery of Near-Boundary Signals [83.0127582612634]
  Near-boundary Rescue (NSR) is a minimal, plug-and-play modification that retains out-of-bound tokens to recover lost signals.<n>NSR substantially improves training stability and delivers consistent gains over strong baselines such as DAPO and GSPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T16:45:31Z)
• Amplifying, Not Learning: Fine-Tuned AI Text Detectors Amplify a Pretrained Direction [51.56484100374058]
  Text detectors amplify a pretrained typicality axis; they do not construct an AI-vs-human boundary.<n>On raw encoders before any task supervision, projecting onto centroid(AI)-centroid(HC3) achieves NYT-vs-HC3 AUROC 0.806/0.944/0.834 across three architectures.<n>On RoBERTa-base, raw projection exceeds fine-tuning; on RoBERTa-base, full fine-tuning reduces discrimination below raw on both fluent-formal populations tested.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T19:08:38Z)
• Tracing Uncertainty in Language Model "Reasoning" [46.61902399979181]
  Language model (LM) "reasoning", commonly described as Chain-of-Thought or test-time scaling, often improves benchmark performance.<n>We study these dynamics by treating the "reasoning" traces, the intermediate token sequences generated by LMs, as evolving model states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T14:16:37Z)
• A Tale of Two Variances: When Single-Seed Benchmarks Fail in Bayesian Deep Learning [10.891872788947298]
  Local CRPS variance provides a direct signal of single-seed estimation error.<n>Power-law fit quality and monotonicity together provide compact method-level summaries of trajectory regularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-25T02:52:33Z)
• Environment-Aware Indoor LoRaWAN Path Loss: Parametric Regression Comparisons, Shadow Fading, and Calibrated Fade Margins [3.776919981139063]
  Indoor LoRaWAN propagation is shaped by structural and time-varying context factors.<n>We present an environment-aware, statistically disciplined path loss framework evaluated using leakage-safe cross-validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T20:14:48Z)
• Improved techniques for deterministic l2 robustness [63.34032156196848]
  Training convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with a strict 1-Lipschitz constraint under the $l_2$ norm is useful for adversarial robustness, interpretable gradients and stable training. We introduce a procedure to certify robustness of 1-Lipschitz CNNs by replacing the last linear layer with a 1-hidden layer. We significantly advance the state-of-the-art for standard and provable robust accuracies on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T19:10:12Z)
• Adversarial Unlearning: Reducing Confidence Along Adversarial Directions [88.46039795134993]
  We propose a complementary regularization strategy that reduces confidence on self-generated examples. The method, which we call RCAD, aims to reduce confidence on out-of-distribution examples lying along directions adversarially chosen to increase training loss. Despite its simplicity, we find on many classification benchmarks that RCAD can be added to existing techniques to increase test accuracy by 1-3% in absolute value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-03T02:26:24Z)
• Label Distributionally Robust Losses for Multi-class Classification: Consistency, Robustness and Adaptivity [55.29408396918968]
  We study a family of loss functions named label-distributionally robust (LDR) losses for multi-class classification. Our contributions include both consistency and robustness by establishing top-$k$ consistency of LDR losses for multi-class classification. We propose a new adaptive LDR loss that automatically adapts the individualized temperature parameter to the noise degree of class label of each instance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-30T00:27:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.