How Do Tool-Augmented LLM Agents Perform on Real-World Energy Analytics Tasks?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26346v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 19:38:21 GMT
• Title: How Do Tool-Augmented LLM Agents Perform on Real-World Energy Analytics Tasks?
• Abstract summary: We present an empirical study of tool-augmented LLM agents on real-world energy market analytics tasks.<n>Our evaluation environment includes 243 expert-curated problems across three categories: Market Data Retrieval and Analysis, Knowledge Retrieval and Interpretation, and Advanced Quantitative Modeling and Decision Analytics.<n>Agents are equipped with a suite of domain tools, including live electricity market APIs for major U.S. ISOs, regulatory docket search, utility tariff databases, asset optimization models, and retrieval-augmented generation over energy market documents.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Agentic benchmarks have emerged across general-purpose and domain-specific settings, including finance, coding, law, and drug discovery, yet energy-domain evaluations remain largely limited to static knowledge recall. This is a critical gap for a sector that requires live data retrieval, specialized regulatory and market knowledge, and multi-step quantitative reasoning under real-world constraints. We present an empirical study of tool-augmented LLM agents on real-world energy market analytics tasks. Our evaluation environment includes 243 expert-curated problems across three categories: (1) Market Data Retrieval and Analysis, (2) Knowledge Retrieval and Interpretation, and (3) Advanced Quantitative Modeling and Decision Analytics. Tasks include price and demand analysis, tariff impact modeling, asset revenue and returns estimation, hedging strategy analysis, and optimization modeling, with problems spanning multiple difficulty levels. Agents are equipped with a configurable suite of domain tools, including live electricity market APIs for major U.S. ISOs, regulatory docket search, utility tariff databases, asset optimization models, and retrieval-augmented generation over energy market documents. We assess agent responses using a multi-dimensional evaluation protocol that scores approach correctness, answer accuracy, attribute alignment, and source validity, with category-aware routing to match scoring criteria to question type. We evaluate both closed-source and open-source LLMs, providing a comparative analysis of how model capability and domain tooling interact in a high-stakes professional domain. Key artifacts are publicly released to support reproducibility and future research.

Related papers

• AIDABench: AI Data Analytics Benchmark [62.45908988324612]
  AIDABench is a benchmark for evaluating AI systems on complex data analytics tasks in an end-to-end manner.<n>AIDABench encompasses 600+ diverse document analysis tasks across three core capability dimensions: question answering, data visualization, and file generation.<n>We evaluate 11 state-of-the-art models on AIDABench, spanning both proprietary (e.g., Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 3 Pro Preview) and open-source (e.g., Qwen3-Max-2026-01-23-Thinking) families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T08:58:05Z)
• Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMs [66.63911043019294]
  Data preparation aims to denoise raw datasets, uncover cross-dataset relationships, and extract valuable insights from them.<n>This paper focuses on the use of LLM techniques to prepare data for diverse downstream tasks.<n>We introduce a task-centric taxonomy that organizes the field into three major tasks: data cleaning, standardization, error processing, imputation, data integration, and data enrichment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T12:02:45Z)
• Advancing ESG Intelligence: An Expert-level Agent and Comprehensive Benchmark for Sustainable Finance [21.31987959023507]
  We introduce ESGAgent, a hierarchical multi-agent system empowered by a specialized toolset to generate in-depth ESG analysis.<n>We present a benchmark derived from 310 corporate sustainability reports, designed to evaluate capabilities ranging from atomic common-sense questions to the generation of integrated, in-depth analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T15:58:29Z)
• CryptoBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Expert-Level Evaluation of LLM Agents in Cryptocurrency [60.83660377169452]
  This paper introduces CryptoBench, the first expert-curated, dynamic benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the real-world capabilities of Large Language Model (LLM) agents.<n>Unlike general-purpose agent benchmarks for search and prediction, professional crypto analysis presents specific challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-29T09:52:34Z)
• FutureX: An Advanced Live Benchmark for LLM Agents in Future Prediction [92.7392863957204]
  FutureX is the largest and most diverse live benchmark for future prediction.<n>It supports real-time daily updates and eliminates data contamination through an automated pipeline for question gathering and answer collection.<n>We evaluate 25 LLM/agent models, including those with reasoning, search capabilities, and integration of external tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-16T08:54:08Z)
• FinAgentBench: A Benchmark Dataset for Agentic Retrieval in Financial Question Answering [57.18367828883773]
  FinAgentBench is a benchmark for evaluating agentic retrieval with multi-step reasoning in finance.<n>The benchmark consists of 26K expert-annotated examples on S&P-500 listed firms.<n>We evaluate a suite of state-of-the-art models and demonstrate how targeted fine-tuning can significantly improve agentic retrieval performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T22:15:22Z)
• Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents [28.91672694491855]
  The emergence of LLM-based agents represents a paradigm shift in AI.<n>This paper provides the first comprehensive survey of evaluation methodologies for these increasingly capable agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T17:59:23Z)
• FinSphere, a Real-Time Stock Analysis Agent Powered by Instruction-Tuned LLMs and Domain Tools [7.6993069412225905]
  Current financial large language models (FinLLMs) struggle with two critical limitations.<n>The absence of objective evaluation metrics to assess the quality of stock analysis reports and a lack of depth in stock analysis impedes their ability to generate professional-grade insights.<n>This paper introduces FinSphere, a stock analysis agent, along with three major contributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T07:50:50Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models on Financial Report Summarization: An Empirical Study [9.28042182186057]
  We conduct a comparative study on three state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) Our primary motivation is to explore how these models can be harnessed within finance, a field demanding precision, contextual relevance, and robustness against erroneous or misleading information. We introduce an innovative evaluation framework that integrates both quantitative metrics (e.g., precision, recall) and qualitative analyses (e.g., contextual fit, consistency) to provide a holistic view of each model's output quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:36:04Z)
• InsightBench: Evaluating Business Analytics Agents Through Multi-Step Insight Generation [79.09622602860703]
  We introduce InsightBench, a benchmark dataset with three key features.<n>It consists of 100 datasets representing diverse business use cases such as finance and incident management.<n>Unlike existing benchmarks focusing on answering single queries, InsightBench evaluates agents based on their ability to perform end-to-end data analytics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T22:06:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.