From Prompting to Epistemic Proactivity: Temporal Trajectories of Student-AI Interaction in Mathematics Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28472v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 14:54:37 GMT
• Title: From Prompting to Epistemic Proactivity: Temporal Trajectories of Student-AI Interaction in Mathematics Learning
• Abstract summary: GenAI is increasingly used by students as learning companions.<n>This study examined Grade-9 students' dialogue with a general-purpose LLM during mathematics practice.
• Score: 2.024558551027881
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: GenAI is increasingly used by students as learning companions, yet little is known about how they use these tools in open-ended learning settings, where the goal is not to complete a specific task but to improve understanding and making progress. This study examined Grade-9 students' dialogue with a general-purpose LLM during mathematics practice, in which students prepared a curriculum-aligned skill for a later assessment. We investigated whether students' interactions revealed forms of epistemically proactive AI use: trajectories in which they strategically use and regulate AI to advance their understanding, and whether these trajectories predicted immediate AI-free performance on the same skill. A total of 112 students worked with a web-based LLM tutor on a mathematical-modeling task; 97 completed both AI-free pre- and post-tests. Student turns were coded for self-regulated learning functions, help-seeking content, and mathematical-modeling activity; three dimensions hypothesized to capture epistemically proactive AI use in this task. Descriptively, students' interactions showed little explicit regulation and mostly involved procedural or conceptual questions. Static summaries of AI use, including whole-session prompt functions, request types, modeling stages, and behavioral diversity, did not predict post-test performance after controlling for prior knowledge. In contrast, temporal indicators were informative: students performed better when their interactions shifted from early to late phases toward a more epistemically proactive balance of conceptual or procedural help-seeking and mathematical work, rather than verification, answer-seeking, or validation. These findings suggest that productive AI-supported learning is better understood as a domain-specific trajectory of epistemic proactivity. We discuss implications for AI tutor design and classroom orchestration.

Related papers

• AI in the Wild: A Large Scale Analysis of Authentic Interactions of College Students with Generative AI [5.052839340528487]
  We present a large-scale analysis of naturally occurring student-AI interactions collected from undergraduate students across multiple university courses and academic domains.<n>The dataset comprises over 15,000 student-AI interaction units drawn from voluntary use of generative AI during real coursework.<n>Our analysis reveals that student-AI interaction is highly structured. Across courses, interactions concentrate in a small number of recurring patterns rather than exhibiting highly idiosyncratic use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-28T15:07:53Z)
• Regulating the AI Tutor: Intentions, Help-Seeking, and Self-Regulated Learning in Adolescent GenAI Use [2.024558551027881]
  This work-in-progress examines open-ended conversational data from 98 Grade-9 students across three German Gymnasium schools.<n>We collected pre-post domain knowledge, pre-chat learning needs, and self-reported cognitive load.<n>Although students overwhelmingly selected scaffolded support before the chat, their interactions were dominated by instrumental requests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-07T10:47:52Z)
• The Role of Instructional Guidance in Generative AI-Assisted Learning: Empirical Evidence from Construction Engineering Education [2.856083627975759]
  This study examines how instructional guidance shapes student and AI interaction in construction education.<n>A five-step prompting framework grounded in Generative Learning Theory is introduced to guide learner interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T23:27:46Z)
• Intentmaking and Sensemaking: Human Interaction with AI-Guided Mathematical Discovery [72.49593499512092]
  We identify and characterize a distinct workflow we term intentmaking.<n>We frame this as a natural extension to sensemaking.<n>Our documentation of these themes suggests an approach to designing AI tools for scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T09:30:25Z)
• Unpacking Vibe Coding: Help-Seeking Processes in Student-AI Interactions While Programming [1.3802799822705387]
  Generative AI is reshaping higher education programming through vibe coding, where students collaborate with AI via natural language.<n>We analyze 19,418 interaction turns from 110 undergraduate students to compare top- and low-performing students.<n>Results reveal that top performers engaged in instrumental help-seeking, eliciting tutor-like AI responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T19:35:10Z)
• Teaching Students to Question the Machine: An AI Literacy Intervention Improves Students' Regulation of LLM Use in a Science Task [0.0]
  The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence in schools raises concerns about students' uncritical reliance on its outputs.<n>These skills are still developing in middle school, making students vulnerable to over-trust and premature acceptance of AI outputs.<n>We report a controlled classroom study examining whether a two-hour AI literacy workshop improves students' interaction strategies and quality of final answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T12:19:43Z)
• Decoding AI Tutor Effects for Educational Measurement: Temporal, Multi-Outcome, and Behavior-Cognitive Analysis [0.3342165620612816]
  We propose an AI agent prototype framework for exploring AI-assisted learning with temporal interaction patterns, multiple outcomes analysis, and behavioral-cognitive learner profiling.<n>An AI tutor agent has been developed to provide various feedback forms to learners, including hints, explanations, examples, and code.<n>A neural policy model and simulation framework are used to produce artificial student-AI tutor interaction records, which include response time, attempts, hint requests, correctness, quiz results, improvement, satisfaction, and trust.<n>The results showed that early interaction patterns were predictive of later performance and trust, that student behavior changed over time with AI-based tutoring, and
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-22T00:43:17Z)
• Towards Agentic Intelligence for Materials Science [73.4576385477731]
  This survey advances a unique pipeline-centric view that spans from corpus curation and pretraining to goal-conditioned agents interfacing with simulation and experimental platforms.<n>To bridge communities and establish a shared frame of reference, we first present an integrated lens that aligns terminology, evaluation, and workflow stages across AI and materials science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T23:48:43Z)
• Improving Question Embeddings with Cognitive Representation Optimization for Knowledge Tracing [77.14348157016518]
  Research on KT modeling focuses on predicting future student performance based on existing, unupdated records of student learning interactions.<n>We propose a knowledge-tracking cognitive representation optimization (CRO-KT) model that uses dynamic programming algorithms to optimize the structure of cognitive representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T09:32:03Z)
• Online inductive learning from answer sets for efficient reinforcement learning exploration [52.03682298194168]
  We exploit inductive learning of answer set programs to learn a set of logical rules representing an explainable approximation of the agent policy.<n>We then perform answer set reasoning on the learned rules to guide the exploration of the learning agent at the next batch.<n>Our methodology produces a significant boost in the discounted return achieved by the agent, even in the first batches of training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T16:13:22Z)
• Empowering Private Tutoring by Chaining Large Language Models [87.76985829144834]
  This work explores the development of a full-fledged intelligent tutoring system powered by state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) The system is into three inter-connected core processes-interaction, reflection, and reaction. Each process is implemented by chaining LLM-powered tools along with dynamically updated memory modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T02:42:03Z)
• Explainable Active Learning (XAL): An Empirical Study of How Local Explanations Impact Annotator Experience [76.9910678786031]
  We propose a novel paradigm of explainable active learning (XAL), by introducing techniques from the recently surging field of explainable AI (XAI) into an Active Learning setting. Our study shows benefits of AI explanation as interfaces for machine teaching--supporting trust calibration and enabling rich forms of teaching feedback, and potential drawbacks--anchoring effect with the model judgment and cognitive workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-24T22:52:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.