Rethinking Build vs. Buy Decisions in Enterprise Software: Navigating Trade-offs through a Structured Decision-Support Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.29816v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 05:49:40 GMT
• Title: Rethinking Build vs. Buy Decisions in Enterprise Software: Navigating Trade-offs through a Structured Decision-Support Approach
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a structured decision-support approach designed to augment build-versus-buy decision-making.<n>The approach is grounded in an ontology of decision factors spanning strategic considerations, application characteristics, cost and budget constraints, and risk dimensions.<n>The results suggest that making decision criteria explicit and systematically comparable can improve the quality, transparency, and auditability of build-versus-buy decisions in enterprise settings.
• Score: 2.4872412262736825
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Build-versus-buy decisions remain a persistent challenge in enterprise software development, shaped by competing strategic, technical, cost, and risk considerations. The increasing availability of third-party solutions alongside the growing feasibility of custom development through cloud-native technologies, APIs, and low-code platforms has further amplified the complexity of these decisions. In practice, organizations often rely on fragmented expertise and informal reasoning, making it difficult to systematically analyze trade-offs or justify decisions over time. This paper presents a structured decision-support approach designed to augment build-versus-buy decision-making in such contexts. The approach is grounded in an ontology of decision factors spanning strategic considerations, application characteristics, cost and budget constraints, and risk dimensions. It combines this factor model with rule-based reasoning and reference-level matching to support decision-making even in cold-start scenarios where historical data is unavailable. The approach is implemented as a lightweight advisory artifact that enables users to evaluate relevant factors, explore trade-offs, and derive recommendations with transparent reasoning. The applicability of the approach is illustrated through a finance domain case, demonstrating how structured factor analysis can clarify decision rationale and highlight conditions under which decisions may change over time. The results suggest that making decision criteria explicit and systematically comparable can improve the quality, transparency, and auditability of build-versus-buy decisions in enterprise settings.

Related papers

• Uncertainty-Aware Generation and Decision-Making Under Ambiguity [57.15357080072861]
  We present and evaluate various uncertainty-aware decision-making algorithms based on Bayesian decision theory and risk-averse decision making.<n>We find empirically that these algorithms can improve the utility of the generations but need to be carefully implemented when ambiguity is high.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-29T17:20:43Z)
• A Structured Evaluation Framework for Low-Code Platform Selection: A Multi-Criteria Decision Model for Enterprise Digital Transformation [0.0]
  This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation framework based on five key criteria.<n>We propose a weighted scoring model that allows organizations to quantitatively assess and compare different low-code platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T12:42:11Z)
• DecisionFlow: Advancing Large Language Model as Principled Decision Maker [49.088778182807395]
  DecisionFlow is a novel decision modeling framework that guides models to reason over structured representations of actions, attributes, and constraints.<n>Rather than predicting answers directly from prompts, DecisionFlow builds a semantically grounded decision space and infers a latent utility function.<n> Empirical results show that DecisionFlow achieves up to 30% accuracy gains over strong prompting baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T16:23:53Z)
• Retrieval Augmented Decision-Making: A Requirements-Driven, Multi-Criteria Framework for Structured Decision Support [8.585671505840637]
  This paper proposes the RAD method, which integrates Multi-Criteria Decision Making with the semantic understanding capabilities of LLMs.<n>The method automatically extracts key criteria from industry documents, builds a weighted hierarchical decision model, and generates structured reports under model guidance.<n> Experiments show that in various decision-making tasks, the decision reports generated by RAD significantly outperform existing methods in terms of detail, rationality, and structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T03:13:29Z)
• Conformalized Decision Risk Assessment [5.391713612899277]
  We introduce CREDO, a novel framework that quantifies for any candidate decision, a distribution-free upper bound on the probability that the decision is suboptimal.<n>By combining inverse optimization geometry with conformal prediction and generative modeling, CREDO produces risk certificates that are both statistically rigorous and practically interpretable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T15:24:38Z)
• Decision Making in Changing Environments: Robustness, Query-Based Learning, and Differential Privacy [59.64384863882473]
  We study the problem of interactive decision making in which the underlying environment changes over time subject to given constraints.<n>We propose a framework, which provides an complexity between the complexity and adversarial settings of decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T21:31:50Z)
• ABI Approach: Automatic Bias Identification in Decision-Making Under Risk based in an Ontology of Behavioral Economics [46.57327530703435]
  Risk seeking preferences for losses, driven by biases such as loss aversion, pose challenges and can result in severe negative consequences. This research introduces the ABI approach, a novel solution designed to support organizational decision-makers by automatically identifying and explaining risk seeking preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T23:53:46Z)
• On strategies for risk management and decision making under uncertainty shared across multiple fields [55.2480439325792]
  The paper finds more than 110 examples of such strategies and this approach to risk is termed RDOT: Risk-reducing Design and Operations Toolkit.<n>RDOT strategies fall into six broad categories: structural, reactive, formal, adversarial, multi-stage and positive.<n>Overall, RDOT represents an overlooked class of versatile responses to uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T16:14:32Z)
• Rational Decision-Making Agent with Internalized Utility Judgment [88.01612847081677]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable advancements and have attracted significant efforts to develop LLMs into agents capable of executing intricate multi-step decision-making tasks beyond traditional NLP applications.<n>This paper proposes RadAgent, which fosters the development of its rationality through an iterative framework involving Experience Exploration and Utility Learning.<n> Experimental results on the ToolBench dataset demonstrate RadAgent's superiority over baselines, achieving over 10% improvement in Pass Rate on diverse tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T03:11:45Z)
• On solving decision and risk management problems subject to uncertainty [91.3755431537592]
  Uncertainty is a pervasive challenge in decision and risk management. This paper develops a systematic understanding of such strategies, determine their range of application, and develop a framework to better employ them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-18T19:16:23Z)
• Inverse Active Sensing: Modeling and Understanding Timely Decision-Making [111.07204912245841]
  We develop a framework for the general setting of evidence-based decision-making under endogenous, context-dependent time pressure. We demonstrate how it enables modeling intuitive notions of surprise, suspense, and optimality in decision strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T02:30:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.