A Structured Evaluation Framework for Low-Code Platform Selection: A Multi-Criteria Decision Model for Enterprise Digital Transformation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18590v1
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 12:42:11 GMT
- Title: A Structured Evaluation Framework for Low-Code Platform Selection: A Multi-Criteria Decision Model for Enterprise Digital Transformation
- Authors: Antonio Lamanna,
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation framework based on five key criteria.<n>We propose a weighted scoring model that allows organizations to quantitatively assess and compare different low-code platforms.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The rapid adoption of Low-Code Development Platforms (LCDPs) has created a critical need for systematic evaluation methodologies that enable organizations to make informed platform selection decisions. This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation framework based on five key criteria: Business Process Orchestration, UI/UX Customization, Integration and Interoperability, Governance and Security, and AI-Enhanced Automation. We propose a weighted scoring model that allows organizations to quantitatively assess and compare different low-code platforms based on their specific requirements and strategic priorities. The framework addresses the gap between marketing-driven platform comparisons and rigorous, context-specific evaluation methodologies. Through empirical validation in enterprise environments, we demonstrate how this structured approach can significantly improve decision-making outcomes and reduce the risk of platform lock-in or inadequate solution selection.
Related papers
- Strategy Executability in Mathematical Reasoning: Leveraging Human-Model Differences for Effective Guidance [86.46794021499511]
We show a previously underexplored gap between strategy usage and strategy executability.<n>We propose Selective Strategy Retrieval (SSR), a test-time framework that explicitly models executability.<n> SSR yields reliable and consistent improvements over direct solving, in-context learning, and single-source guidance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T03:34:23Z) - Decision Quality Evaluation Framework at Pinterest [0.36944296923226316]
The framework is centered on a high-trust Golden Set (GDS) curated by subject matter experts (SMEs)<n>We introduce an automated intelligent sampling pipeline that uses propensity scores to efficiently expand dataset coverage.<n>The framework enables a shift from subjective assessments to a data-driven and quantitative practice for managing content safety systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-17T18:45:55Z) - TCPO: Thought-Centric Preference Optimization for Effective Embodied Decision-making [75.29820290660065]
This paper proposes Thought-Centric Preference Optimization ( TCPO) for effective embodied decision-making.<n>It emphasizes the alignment of the model's intermediate reasoning process, mitigating the problem of model degradation.<n>Experiments in the ALFWorld environment demonstrate an average success rate of 26.67%, achieving a 6% improvement over RL4VLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-10T11:16:21Z) - From Bits to Boardrooms: A Cutting-Edge Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Business Excellence [11.26863280050794]
BusiAgent is a novel multi-agent framework leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for advanced decision-making in complex corporate environments.<n>BusiAgent integrates three core innovations: an extended Continuous Time Markov Decision Process (CTMDP) for dynamic agent modeling, a generalized entropy measure to optimize collaborative efficiency, and a multi-level Stackelberg game to handle hierarchical decision processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-21T11:08:53Z) - A New Approach for Multicriteria Assessment in the Ranking of Alternatives Using Cardinal and Ordinal Data [0.0]
We propose a novel MCA approach that combines two Virtual Gap Analysis (VGA) models.<n>The VGA framework, rooted in linear programming, is pivotal in the MCA methodology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-10T04:00:48Z) - DecisionFlow: Advancing Large Language Model as Principled Decision Maker [49.088778182807395]
DecisionFlow is a novel decision modeling framework that guides models to reason over structured representations of actions, attributes, and constraints.<n>Rather than predicting answers directly from prompts, DecisionFlow builds a semantically grounded decision space and infers a latent utility function.<n> Empirical results show that DecisionFlow achieves up to 30% accuracy gains over strong prompting baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T16:23:53Z) - Retrieval Augmented Decision-Making: A Requirements-Driven, Multi-Criteria Framework for Structured Decision Support [8.585671505840637]
This paper proposes the RAD method, which integrates Multi-Criteria Decision Making with the semantic understanding capabilities of LLMs.<n>The method automatically extracts key criteria from industry documents, builds a weighted hierarchical decision model, and generates structured reports under model guidance.<n> Experiments show that in various decision-making tasks, the decision reports generated by RAD significantly outperform existing methods in terms of detail, rationality, and structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-24T03:13:29Z) - An incremental preference elicitation-based approach to learning potentially non-monotonic preferences in multi-criteria sorting [53.36437745983783]
We first construct a max-margin optimization-based model to model potentially non-monotonic preferences.
We devise information amount measurement methods and question selection strategies to pinpoint the most informative alternative in each iteration.
Two incremental preference elicitation-based algorithms are developed to learn potentially non-monotonic preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-04T14:36:20Z) - LLM4Rerank: LLM-based Auto-Reranking Framework for Recommendations [51.76373105981212]
Reranking is a critical component in recommender systems, playing an essential role in refining the output of recommendation algorithms.<n>We introduce a comprehensive reranking framework, designed to seamlessly integrate various reranking criteria.<n>A customizable input mechanism is also integrated, enabling the tuning of the language model's focus to meet specific reranking needs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T09:29:18Z) - Benchmarking PtO and PnO Methods in the Predictive Combinatorial Optimization Regime [59.27851754647913]
Predictive optimization is the precise modeling of many real-world applications, including energy cost-aware scheduling and budget allocation on advertising.
We develop a modular framework to benchmark 11 existing PtO/PnO methods on 8 problems, including a new industrial dataset for advertising.
Our study shows that PnO approaches are better than PtO on 7 out of 8 benchmarks, but there is no silver bullet found for the specific design choices of PnO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T13:19:34Z) - Revisiting GANs by Best-Response Constraint: Perspective, Methodology,
and Application [49.66088514485446]
Best-Response Constraint (BRC) is a general learning framework to explicitly formulate the potential dependency of the generator on the discriminator.
We show that even with different motivations and formulations, a variety of existing GANs ALL can be uniformly improved by our flexible BRC methodology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-20T12:42:41Z) - A Decision Model for Decentralized Autonomous Organization Platform
Selection: Three Industry Case Studies [0.0]
Decentralized autonomous organizations as a new form of online governance arecollections of smart contracts deployed on a blockchain platform.
This study presents a decision model as a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making problem for the decentralized autonomous organization platform selection problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T10:05:56Z) - Application-Driven Learning: A Closed-Loop Prediction and Optimization Approach Applied to Dynamic Reserves and Demand Forecasting [41.94295877935867]
We present application-driven learning, a new closed-loop framework in which the processes of forecasting and decision-making are merged and co-optimized.
We show that the proposed methodology is scalable and yields consistently better performance than the standard open-loop approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-26T02:43:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.