Neuro-Bayesian-Symbolic Residual Attention Shallow Network: Explainable Deep Learning for Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30953v1
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 22:16:22 GMT
- Title: Neuro-Bayesian-Symbolic Residual Attention Shallow Network: Explainable Deep Learning for Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
- Abstract summary: We introduce the Neuro-Bayesian-Symbolic Residual Attention Shallow Network (NBS-RASN)<n>NBS-RASN is a hybrid neural architecture for explainable cybersecurity risk assessment in open-source ecosystems.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We introduce the Neuro-Bayesian-Symbolic Residual Attention Shallow Network (NBS-RASN), a hybrid neural architecture for explainable cybersecurity risk assessment in open-source ecosystems. Unlike deep models that trade interpretability for accuracy, our shallow network encodes domain knowledge, causal reasoning, and expert judgment as differentiable components. It uses 80 interpretable neurons across 12 layers, including a gatekeeper that enforces five epistemological axioms - precision, causality, falsifiability, transparency, and completeness - as hard constraints before propagation. Despite limited depth, the network exhibits deep-learning traits via residual attention and feedback loops, learning complex risk patterns without becoming a black box. It produces fully decomposable scores: a deterministic weighted component plus an expert adjustment, with each adjustment traceable to named amplifiers (blast radius, propagation speed, structural nature, default exposure, exploitation pattern, institutional criticality). We validate on 20 open-source projects covering all OWASP Top 10:2025 categories and language risk classes, achieving confidence scores of 0.79-0.97, and show that explainability is guaranteed by design, not by a training algorithm. This challenges the assumption that deep learning requires deep networks, proving that shallow networks with deep reasoning can outperform opaque models in high-stakes cybersecurity, where interpretability is essential.
Related papers
- Estimating Neural Network Robustness via Lipschitz Constant and Architecture Sensitivity [6.468625143772815]
This paper investigates the robustness of neural networks in perception systems.
We identify the Lipschitz constant as a key metric for quantifying and enhancing network robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-30T18:38:42Z) - Towards Improving Robustness Against Common Corruptions using Mixture of
Class Specific Experts [10.27974860479791]
This paper introduces a novel paradigm known as the Mixture of Class-Specific Expert Architecture.
The proposed architecture aims to mitigate vulnerabilities associated with common neural network structures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T20:09:47Z) - The Boundaries of Verifiable Accuracy, Robustness, and Generalisation in Deep Learning [71.14237199051276]
We consider classical distribution-agnostic framework and algorithms minimising empirical risks.
We show that there is a large family of tasks for which computing and verifying ideal stable and accurate neural networks is extremely challenging.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-13T16:33:27Z) - Capsa: A Unified Framework for Quantifying Risk in Deep Neural Networks [142.67349734180445]
Existing algorithms that provide risk-awareness to deep neural networks are complex and ad-hoc.
Here we present capsa, a framework for extending models with risk-awareness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-01T02:07:47Z) - Model-Agnostic Reachability Analysis on Deep Neural Networks [25.54542656637704]
We develop a model-agnostic verification framework, called DeepAgn.
It can be applied to FNNs, Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), or a mixture of both.
It does not require access to the network's internal structures, such as layers and parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-03T09:01:59Z) - Generalized Uncertainty of Deep Neural Networks: Taxonomy and
Applications [1.9671123873378717]
We show that the uncertainty of deep neural networks is not only important in a sense of interpretability and transparency, but also crucial in further advancing their performance.
We will generalize the definition of the uncertainty of deep neural networks to any number or vector that is associated with an input or an input-label pair, and catalog existing methods on mining'' such uncertainty from a deep model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-02T22:02:33Z) - Rank Diminishing in Deep Neural Networks [71.03777954670323]
Rank of neural networks measures information flowing across layers.
It is an instance of a key structural condition that applies across broad domains of machine learning.
For neural networks, however, the intrinsic mechanism that yields low-rank structures remains vague and unclear.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-13T12:03:32Z) - Searching for the Essence of Adversarial Perturbations [73.96215665913797]
We show that adversarial perturbations contain human-recognizable information, which is the key conspirator responsible for a neural network's erroneous prediction.
This concept of human-recognizable information allows us to explain key features related to adversarial perturbations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-30T18:04:57Z) - Interpretable part-whole hierarchies and conceptual-semantic
relationships in neural networks [4.153804257347222]
We present Agglomerator, a framework capable of providing a representation of part-whole hierarchies from visual cues.
We evaluate our method on common datasets, such as SmallNORB, MNIST, FashionMNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-07T10:56:13Z) - Provable Regret Bounds for Deep Online Learning and Control [77.77295247296041]
We show that any loss functions can be adapted to optimize the parameters of a neural network such that it competes with the best net in hindsight.
As an application of these results in the online setting, we obtain provable bounds for online control controllers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-15T02:13:48Z) - A neural anisotropic view of underspecification in deep learning [60.119023683371736]
We show that the way neural networks handle the underspecification of problems is highly dependent on the data representation.
Our results highlight that understanding the architectural inductive bias in deep learning is fundamental to address the fairness, robustness, and generalization of these systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-29T14:31:09Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.