OopsieVerse: A Safety Benchmark with Damage-Aware Simulation for Robot Manipulation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31993v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:30:05 GMT
- Title: OopsieVerse: A Safety Benchmark with Damage-Aware Simulation for Robot Manipulation
- Abstract summary: OOPSIEVERSE is a unified simulation framework and benchmark for damage-aware household manipulation.<n>OOPSIEVERSE provides damage as an explicit, physically-grounded, and taskagnostic signal.<n>Our results highlight the potential of OOPSIEVERSE as an open-source foundation for systematic, scalable research on safe robot manipulation.
- Score: 12.792879405441163
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: While robotic manipulation capabilities have advanced rapidly, physical safety remains a major barrier to deploying household robots: task success is insufficient if the robot damages itself or its surroundings. Simulation offers a harm-free alternative to costly and dangerous real-world training and evaluation, yet existing simulators lack general mechanisms to detect, quantify, and represent damage. To address this gap, we introduce OOPSIEVERSE, a unified simulation framework and benchmark for damage-aware household manipulation. OOPSIEVERSE provides damage as an explicit, physically-grounded, and taskagnostic signal by converting sources such as contact forces, temperature changes, and liquid interactions into corresponding mechanical, thermal or fluid damage. OOPSIEVERSE comprises two core elements: (1) DAMAGESIM, a simulator-agnostic framework for detecting and quantifying damage during navigation and manipulation, and (2) a suite of household tasks designed to evaluate common damage modes and distinguish between task completion and safe execution. We demonstrate the generality of our framework by instantiating DAMAGESIM in two simulators with different physics backends, OmniGibson (Nvidia Omniverse) and RoboCasa (MuJoCo). We further showcase the utility of OOPSIEVERSE across multiple use cases, including (1) guiding safer demonstration collection via real-time damage feedback, (2) learning safer manipulation policies through damage-conditioned imitation learning and reinforcement learning, (3) benchmarking the safety of state-of-the-art Vision Language Action policies, and (4) improving real-world safety of sim-to-real transferred policies. Together, our results highlight the potential of OOPSIEVERSE as an open-source foundation for systematic, scalable research on safe robot manipulation. For code and more information, please refer to https://robin-lab.cs.utexas.edu/oopsieverse/
Related papers
- ROBOSHACKLES: A Safety Dataset for Human-Injury Prevention in Embodied Foundation Models [5.812025441769613]
Embodied Foundation Models (EFMs) integrate multimodal understanding, future-state reasoning, and executable robot actions.<n>To address this challenge, we propose a safety-critical data construction pipeline for human-injury prevention in EFMs.<n>We construct ROBOSHACKLES, a 10,000-clip robotic video dataset derived from real DROID observations.<n>Results show that all evaluated models produce unsafe actions in the tested safety-critical scenarios, yielding a 100% unsafe action generation rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T03:03:16Z) - Silent Failures in Physical AI: A Literature Review of Runtime Action Authorization for Autonomous Systems [1.9544213396776273]
Physical AI systems increasingly map multimodal observations, language instructions, and learned world representations into physically consequential actions.<n>This transition exposes a safety problem that is not fully captured by conventional AI content moderation.<n>No single stream surveyed supplies a complete runtime authorization boundary between black-box Physical AI models and physical execution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-23T16:48:03Z) - JailWAM: Jailbreaking World Action Models in Robot Control [31.442262458957174]
The World Action Model (WAM) can jointly predict future world states and actions, exhibiting stronger physical manipulation capabilities compared with traditional models.<n>Existing research pays extremely limited attention to the critical security gap: the vulnerability of WAM to jailbreak attacks.<n>We propose JailWAM, the first dedicated jailbreak attack and evaluation framework for WAM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-07T06:41:41Z) - Evaluating Gemini Robotics Policies in a Veo World Simulator [69.23071832313246]
We introduce a generative evaluation system built upon a frontier video foundation model (Veo)<n>The system is optimized to support robot action conditioning and multi-view consistency.<n>We validate these capabilities through 1600+ real-world evaluations of eight Gemini Robotics policy checkpoints and five tasks for a bimanual manipulator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-11T14:22:14Z) - ANNIE: Be Careful of Your Robots [48.89876809734855]
We present the first systematic study of adversarial safety attacks on embodied AI systems.<n>We show attack success rates exceeding 50% across all safety categories.<n>Results expose a previously underexplored but highly consequential attack surface in embodied AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-03T15:00:28Z) - Visuomotor Grasping with World Models for Surgical Robots [6.228255257808355]
We introduce Grasp Anything for Surgery V2 (GASv2), a visuomotor learning framework for surgical grasping.<n>We train the policy in simulation using domain randomization for sim-to-real transfer and deploy it on a real robot in both phantom-based and ex vivo surgical settings.<n>Experiments show our policy achieves a 65% success rate in both settings, generalizes to unseen objects and grippers, and adapts to diverse disturbances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-15T04:23:07Z) - AGENTSAFE: Benchmarking the Safety of Embodied Agents on Hazardous Instructions [64.85086226439954]
We present SAFE, a benchmark for assessing the safety of embodied VLM agents on hazardous instructions.<n> SAFE comprises three components: SAFE-THOR, SAFE-VERSE, and SAFE-DIAGNOSE.<n>We uncover systematic failures in translating hazard recognition into safe planning and execution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-17T16:37:35Z) - SafeAgent: Safeguarding LLM Agents via an Automated Risk Simulator [77.86600052899156]
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly deployed in real-world applications.<n>We propose AutoSafe, the first framework that systematically enhances agent safety through fully automated synthetic data generation.<n>We show that AutoSafe boosts safety scores by 45% on average and achieves a 28.91% improvement on real-world tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-23T10:56:06Z) - Don't Let Your Robot be Harmful: Responsible Robotic Manipulation via Safety-as-Policy [53.048430683355804]
Unthinking execution of human instructions in robotic manipulation can lead to severe safety risks.<n>We present Safety-as-policy, which includes (i) a world model to automatically generate scenarios containing safety risks and conduct virtual interactions, and (ii) a mental model to infer consequences with reflections.<n>We show that Safety-as-policy can avoid risks and efficiently complete tasks in both synthetic dataset and real-world experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-27T12:27:50Z) - DeXtreme: Transfer of Agile In-hand Manipulation from Simulation to
Reality [64.51295032956118]
We train a policy that can perform robust dexterous manipulation on an anthropomorphic robot hand.
Our work reaffirms the possibilities of sim-to-real transfer for dexterous manipulation in diverse kinds of hardware and simulator setups.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-25T01:51:36Z) - Nonprehensile Riemannian Motion Predictive Control [57.295751294224765]
We introduce a novel Real-to-Sim reward analysis technique to reliably imagine and predict the outcome of taking possible actions for a real robotic platform.
We produce a closed-loop controller to reactively push objects in a continuous action space.
We observe that RMPC is robust in cluttered as well as occluded environments and outperforms the baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-15T18:50:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.