CAT: Confidence-Adaptive Thinking for Efficient Reasoning of Large Reasoning Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.00862v1
• Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 12:27:14 GMT
• Title: CAT: Confidence-Adaptive Thinking for Efficient Reasoning of Large Reasoning Models
• Abstract summary: Confidence-Adaptive Thinking (CAT) is a framework that incorporates the model's intrinsic self-certainty signals as confidence into the preference optimization process.<n>Our work enables LRMs to effectively compress confident responses while deliberating on uncertain ones, offering a potentially robust solution for balancing accuracy and latency in practical industrial scenarios.
• Score: 18.894895416263296
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable success on complex tasks by leveraging long chain-of-thought (CoT) trajectories, yet they frequently exhibit overthinking on simple queries, resulting in significant token overhead and reduced inference efficiency. However, existing compression methods predominantly apply uniform length reduction or rely on coarse-grained difficulty estimation, often leading to performance degradation on difficult problems. To address this limitation, we propose Confidence-Adaptive Thinking (CAT), a framework that incorporates the model's intrinsic self-certainty signals as confidence into the preference optimization process, which autonomously modulates reasoning lengths based on problem difficulty. Experimental results show that CAT consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on reasoning accuracy across multiple benchmarks on different base models. Our work enables LRMs to effectively compress confident responses while deliberating on uncertain ones, offering a potentially robust solution for balancing accuracy and latency in practical industrial scenarios.

Related papers

• Before Thinking, Learn to Decide: Proactive Routing for Efficient Visual Reasoning [87.18590662029432]
  We propose PRP, a Proactive Routing Paradigm that enables early decision-making by jointly evaluating the competence of both the draft and target models.<n>Our draft Rating Learning (DRL) equips the draft model with an internal confidence estimator, while Joint Rating Learning (JRL) predicts how well the target model can handle a given query.<n>These ratings enable fine-grained, instance-level textbfProactive Routing and substantially accelerate inference without compromising overall performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-29T12:30:24Z)
• SuCo: Sufficiency-guided Continuous Adaptive Reasoning [59.17222918775686]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often generate excessively long Chain-of-Thoughts (CoT)<n>Existing efforts to mitigate this inefficiency typically rely on discrete reasoning modes or fixed budget tiers.<n>We introduce Minimal Sufficient CoT (MSC), defined as the shortest prefix of a CoT trajectory which is adequate for producing the correct answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T08:52:15Z)
• Better, Faster: Harnessing Self-Improvement in Large Reasoning Models [88.9107786925265]
  We propose HSIR, which effectively Harnesses Self-Improvement in large Reasoning models via two simple-yet-effective approaches.<n>Specifically, HSIR introduces a verify-then-exit sampling strategy to mitigate data imbalance.<n>HSIR also designs an Intrinsic Diversity score to quantify overthinking and filter out the undesired solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-24T10:54:46Z)
• LEAD: Length-Efficient Adaptive and Dynamic Reasoning for Large Language Models [24.128148876541783]
  Large reasoning models, such as OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1, tend to become increasingly verbose as their reasoning capabilities improve.<n>These inflated Chain-of-Length trajectories (CoT) often exceed what the underlying problems require, wasting compute, latency, and context budgets.<n>We propose LEAD (Thought-Efficient Adaptive and Dynamic reasoning), a method that replaces statics with online, self-adaptive mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T23:05:02Z)
• DiSCTT: Consensus-Guided Self-Curriculum for Efficient Test-Time Adaptation in Reasoning [0.5371337604556311]
  TestTT is a difficulty-aware, consensus-guided self-curriculum framework that allocates test-time optimization strategies.<n>We show that TestTT consistently outperforms strong computation baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T16:38:50Z)
• ReasonBENCH: Benchmarking the (In)Stability of LLM Reasoning [2.1461777157838724]
  We introduce ReasonBENCH, the first benchmark designed to quantify the underlying instability in large language models (LLMs) reasoning.<n>Across tasks from different domains, we find that the vast majority of reasoning strategies and models exhibit high instability.<n>We further analyze the impact of prompts, model families, and scale on the trade-off between solve rate and stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T18:26:58Z)
• The Virtues of Brevity: Avoid Overthinking in Parallel Test-Time Reasoning [0.7874708385247352]
  We show that the simple and counterintuitive of selecting the shortest solution is highly effective.<n>We confirm that this approach is competitive with complex methods such as self-consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T00:47:17Z)
• Think Right: Learning to Mitigate Under-Over Thinking via Adaptive, Attentive Compression [68.69801176669843]
  We propose an online post-training RL method that prunes redundant steps and estimates difficulty.<n> TRAAC (Think Right with Adaptive, Attentive Compression) achieves an average absolute accuracy gain of 8.4%.<n>Although our models are trained on math datasets, they show accuracy and efficiency gains on out-of-distribution non-math datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T02:00:20Z)
• Prolonged Reasoning Is Not All You Need: Certainty-Based Adaptive Routing for Efficient LLM/MLLM Reasoning [27.498043430208085]
  Excessive reliance on chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning can impair model performance.<n>We propose Certainty-based Adaptive Reasoning (CAR)<n>CAR switches between short answers and long-form reasoning based on the model perplexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T06:20:17Z)
• Scalable Chain of Thoughts via Elastic Reasoning [61.75753924952059]
  Elastic Reasoning is a novel framework for scalable chain of thoughts.<n>It separates reasoning into two phases--thinking and solution--with independently allocated budgets.<n>Our approach produces more concise and efficient reasoning even in unconstrained settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T15:01:06Z)
• ConCISE: Confidence-guided Compression in Step-by-step Efficient Reasoning [64.93140713419561]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) perform strongly in complex reasoning tasks via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, but often suffer from verbose outputs.<n>Existing fine-tuning-based compression methods either operate post-hoc pruning, risking disruption to reasoning coherence, or rely on sampling-based selection.<n>We introduce ConCISE, a framework designed to generate concise reasoning chains, integrating Confidence Injection to boost reasoning confidence, and Early Stopping to terminate reasoning when confidence is sufficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T01:40:40Z)
• Scalable Best-of-N Selection for Large Language Models via Self-Certainty [75.1351701045874]
  Best-of-N selection is a key technique for improving the reasoning performance of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose self-certainty, a novel and efficient metric that leverages the inherent probability distribution of LLM outputs to estimate response quality without requiring external reward models.<n>Our findings establish self-certainty as a practical and efficient way for improving LLM reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T19:08:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.