Spectral Signatures of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03377v1
• Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 14:30:22 GMT
• Title: Spectral Signatures of Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: We propose spectral shape-based metrics for managing and quantifying large language models (LLMs)<n>Our approach uses the shape information of the weight empirical spectral density as a compact spectral signature of each model.<n>This signature captures intrinsic properties of pretrained models and remains robust during post-training, making it suitable for model-level analysis.
• Score: 13.878105276531976
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapidly growing repository of publicly available large language models (LLMs) presents significant challenges for systematic management and quantification at scale, such as model lineage tracing, licensing, and evaluation. However, task-specific benchmarks are insufficient for this setting, as LLMs differ widely in architectures, scales, and training procedures. To address this challenge, we adopt spectral shape-based metrics for managing and quantifying LLMs based on Heavy-Tailed Self-Regularization theory. Our approach uses the shape information of the weight empirical spectral density as a compact spectral signature of each model. This signature captures intrinsic properties of pretrained models and remains robust during post-training, making it suitable for model-level analysis. In addition, this metric is data-free, computationally-efficient, and scale-invariant, enabling large-scale analysis in practice. Moreover, we curate a large and diverse model corpus consisting of major open-source LLM families, and use it to systematically benchmark spectral and non-spectral metrics across models and downstream tasks. We show that our spectral signature supports the tracking of the model lineage, the unsupervised clustering of similar models, and the quantification of the model performance. Overall, the proposed spectral signature provides a meaningful proxy for broad performance trends across LLMs, enabling efficient organization, comparison, and analysis of large model collections.

Related papers

• Who Built This Model? Tracing LLM Lineage via Spectral Fingerprints in Weight Space [9.829283524934848]
  Open-weight large language models (LLMs) are increasingly developed through complex, multi-stage pipelines.<n>We ask whether LLMs exhibit intrinsic fingerprints in weight space alone, without access to input data, that reveal their origin and lineage.<n>We formulate this as a lineage discrimination problem, distinguishing among independent-origin, same-series, and shared-base models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-07T22:18:02Z)
• LLM attribution analysis across different fine-tuning strategies and model scales for automated code compliance [1.154460794319478]
  This paper employs a perturbation-based attribution analysis to compare the interpretive behaviors of large language models (LLMs) across different fine-tuning strategies.<n>Our results show that FFT produces attribution patterns that are statistically different and more focused than those from parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T23:54:26Z)
• Beyond Accuracy: Characterizing Code Comprehension Capabilities in (Large) Language Models [4.841487377596519]
  This paper investigates whether Large Language Models' code-comprehension performance aligns with traditional human-centric software metrics.<n>We introduce a diagnostic framework that reframes code understanding as a binary input-output consistency task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T10:58:24Z)
• SIGMA: Scalable Spectral Insights for LLM Collapse [51.863164847253366]
  We introduce SIGMA (Spectral Inequalities for Gram Matrix Analysis), a unified framework for model collapse.<n>By utilizing benchmarks that deriving and deterministic bounds on the matrix's spectrum, SIGMA provides a mathematically grounded metric to track the contraction of the representation space.<n>We demonstrate that SIGMA effectively captures the transition towards states, offering both theoretical insights into the mechanics of collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T19:47:11Z)
• The Law of Multi-Model Collaboration: Scaling Limits of Model Ensembling for Large Language Models [54.51795784459866]
  We propose a theoretical framework of performance scaling for multi-model collaboration.<n>We show that multi-model systems follow a power-law scaling with respect to the total parameter count.<n> ensembles of heterogeneous model families achieve better performance scaling than those formed within a single model family.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T09:55:12Z)
• Quantization Meets dLLMs: A Systematic Study of Post-training Quantization for Diffusion LLMs [78.09559830840595]
  We present the first systematic study on quantizing diffusion-based language models.<n>We identify the presence of activation outliers, characterized by abnormally large activation values.<n>We implement state-of-the-art PTQ methods and conduct a comprehensive evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T17:59:51Z)
• Discrete Tokenization for Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Survey [69.45421620616486]
  This work presents the first structured taxonomy and analysis of discrete tokenization methods designed for large language models (LLMs)<n>We categorize 8 representative VQ variants that span classical and modern paradigms and analyze their algorithmic principles, training dynamics, and integration challenges with LLM pipelines.<n>We identify key challenges including codebook collapse, unstable gradient estimation, and modality-specific encoding constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T10:52:14Z)
• Latent Thought Models with Variational Bayes Inference-Time Computation [52.63299874322121]
  Latent Thought Models (LTMs) incorporate explicit latent thought vectors that follow an explicit prior model in latent space.<n>LTMs demonstrate superior sample and parameter efficiency compared to autoregressive models and discrete diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T17:50:34Z)
• Model-GLUE: Democratized LLM Scaling for A Large Model Zoo in the Wild [84.57103623507082]
  This paper introduces Model-GLUE, a holistic Large Language Models scaling guideline.<n>We benchmark existing scaling techniques, especially selective merging, and variants of mixture.<n>We then formulate an optimal strategy for the selection and aggregation of a heterogeneous model zoo.<n>Our methodology involves the clustering of mergeable models and optimal merging strategy selection, and the integration of clusters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T15:55:55Z)
• Evaluating the Generalization Ability of Quantized LLMs: Benchmark, Analysis, and Toolbox [46.39670209441478]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited exciting progress in multiple scenarios. As an effective means to reduce memory footprint and inference cost, quantization also faces challenges in performance degradation at low bit-widths. This work provides a comprehensive benchmark suite for this research topic, including an evaluation system, detailed analyses, and a general toolbox.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-15T12:02:14Z)
• The Role of Model Architecture and Scale in Predicting Molecular Properties: Insights from Fine-Tuning RoBERTa, BART, and LLaMA [0.0]
  This study introduces a systematic framework to compare the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) for fine-tuning across various cheminformatics tasks. We assessed three well-known models-RoBERTa, BART, and LLaMA-on their ability to predict molecular properties. We found that LLaMA-based models generally offered the lowest validation loss, suggesting their superior adaptability across tasks and scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T02:20:12Z)
• A Bayesian Framework on Asymmetric Mixture of Factor Analyser [0.0]
  This paper introduces an MFA model with a rich and flexible class of skew normal (unrestricted) generalized hyperbolic (called SUNGH) distributions. The SUNGH family provides considerable flexibility to model skewness in different directions as well as allowing for heavy tailed data. Considering factor analysis models, the SUNGH family also allows for skewness and heavy tails for both the error component and factor scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-01T20:19:52Z)
• How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Models [95.8037674226622]
  We introduce a 3-dimensional evaluation metric that characterizes the fidelity, diversity and generalization performance of any generative model in a domain-agnostic fashion. Our metric unifies statistical divergence measures with precision-recall analysis, enabling sample- and distribution-level diagnoses of model fidelity and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T18:25:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.