Applying Answer Set Programming with Fuzzy Membership Functions: a Case Study
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03550v1
- Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 18:27:07 GMT
- Title: Applying Answer Set Programming with Fuzzy Membership Functions: a Case Study
- Abstract summary: This paper explores a novel fuzzy-logic-based qualitative extension of Answer Set Programming (ASP) to bridge numerical information and qualitative reasoning.<n>Key features, including learning-based membership functions and semantically enriched predicates, enable the combination of expert knowledge, contextual factors, and subjective interpretations.
- Score: 2.5899040911480182
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Human reasoning often operates through qualitative concepts expressed by linguistic labels such as high, low, expensive, or cheap, whose interpretation depends on context and is usually vague, despite being rooted in numerical data. This paper explores a novel fuzzy-logic-based qualitative extension of Answer Set Programming (ASP) to bridge numerical information and qualitative reasoning. The underlying language, formally introduced in a separate work, provides a principled framework that avoids rigid thresholds and supports robust reasoning under vagueness. Focusing on a representative use case, we illustrate how the framework integrates numerically grounded inputs (such as outputs of machine learning models) with symbolic reasoning over qualitative labels. Key features, including learning-based membership functions and semantically enriched predicates, enable the combination of expert knowledge, contextual factors, and subjective interpretations within a unified declarative setting.
Related papers
- Towards Ontology-Based Descriptions of Conversations with Qualitatively-Defined Concepts [2.748993665644782]
This work proposes an ontology-based approach to formally define conversational features that are typically qualitative in nature.<n>We apply this framework to the task of proficiency-level control in conversations, using CEFR language proficiency levels as a case study.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our approach provides consistent and explainable proficiency-level definitions, improving transparency in conversational AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-05T08:44:27Z) - KAG-Thinker: Interactive Thinking and Deep Reasoning in LLMs via Knowledge-Augmented Generation [35.555200530999365]
We introduce KAG-Thinker, which upgrade KAG to a multi-turn interactive thinking and deep reasoning framework powered by a dedicated parameter-light large language model (LLM)<n>Our approach constructs a structured thinking process for solving complex problems, enhancing the the logical coherence and contextual consistency of the reasoning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-21T14:58:53Z) - Explaining the Unexplained: Revealing Hidden Correlations for Better Interpretability [1.8274323268621635]
Real Explainer (RealExp) is an interpretability method that decouples the Shapley Value into individual feature importance and feature correlation importance.<n>RealExp enhances interpretability by precisely quantifying both individual feature contributions and their interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-02T10:50:50Z) - Integration of Contextual Descriptors in Ontology Alignment for Enrichment of Semantic Correspondence [13.69268253901738]
A formalization was developed that enables the integration of essential and contextual descriptors to create a comprehensive knowledge model.<n>The hierarchical structure of the semantic approach and the mathematical apparatus for analyzing potential conflicts between concepts are demonstrated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-28T12:59:32Z) - Distributional Associations vs In-Context Reasoning: A Study of Feed-forward and Attention Layers [49.80959223722325]
We study the distinction between feed-forward and attention layers in large language models.<n>We find that feed-forward layers tend to learn simple distributional associations such as bigrams, while attention layers focus on in-context reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T08:51:08Z) - A Note on an Inferentialist Approach to Resource Semantics [48.65926948745294]
'Inferentialism' is the view that meaning is given in terms of inferential behaviour.
This paper shows how 'inferentialism' enables a versatile and expressive framework for resource semantics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T14:13:21Z) - Inferentialist Resource Semantics [48.65926948745294]
This paper shows how inferentialism enables a versatile and expressive framework for resource semantics.<n>How inferentialism seamlessly incorporates the assertion-based approach of the logic of Bunched Implications.<n>This integration enables reasoning about shared and separated resources in intuitive and familiar ways.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-14T14:54:36Z) - An Encoding of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks into Higher-Order Logic [57.24311218570012]
This approach allows for the computer-assisted analysis of abstract dialectical frameworks.
Exemplary applications include the formal analysis and verification of meta-theoretical properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-08T09:32:26Z) - Towards Procedural Fairness: Uncovering Biases in How a Toxic Language
Classifier Uses Sentiment Information [7.022948483613112]
This work is a step towards evaluating procedural fairness, where unfair processes lead to unfair outcomes.
The produced knowledge can guide debiasing techniques to ensure that important concepts besides identity terms are well-represented in training datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-19T16:03:25Z) - elBERto: Self-supervised Commonsense Learning for Question Answering [131.51059870970616]
We propose a Self-supervised Bidirectional Representation Learning of Commonsense framework, which is compatible with off-the-shelf QA model architectures.
The framework comprises five self-supervised tasks to force the model to fully exploit the additional training signals from contexts containing rich commonsense.
elBERto achieves substantial improvements on out-of-paragraph and no-effect questions where simple lexical similarity comparison does not help.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-17T16:23:45Z) - Fact-driven Logical Reasoning for Machine Reading Comprehension [82.58857437343974]
We are motivated to cover both commonsense and temporary knowledge clues hierarchically.
Specifically, we propose a general formalism of knowledge units by extracting backbone constituents of the sentence.
We then construct a supergraph on top of the fact units, allowing for the benefit of sentence-level (relations among fact groups) and entity-level interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-21T13:11:13Z) - Natural language technology and query expansion: issues,
state-of-the-art and perspectives [0.0]
Linguistic characteristics that cause ambiguity and misinterpretation of queries as well as additional factors affect the users ability to accurately represent their information needs.
We lay down the anatomy of a generic linguistic based query expansion framework and propose its module-based decomposition.
For each of the modules we review the state-of-the-art solutions in the literature and categorized under the light of the techniques used.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-23T11:39:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.