Who's Behind It? Annotating and Extracting Conspiratorial Actors from German Telegram Posts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04962v1
• Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 11:49:32 GMT
• Title: Who's Behind It? Annotating and Extracting Conspiratorial Actors from German Telegram Posts
• Abstract summary: We develop guidelines for conspiratorial actors, present a span-annotated corpus of German Telegram posts, and investigate their automatic extraction.<n>Our results demonstrate that conspiratorial actors can be annotated with meaningful agreement and extracted with reasonable accuracy.
• Score: 0.13048920509133807
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Conspiracy theories commonly attribute important events to the actions of powerful and secretive actors. While computational research has largely focused on document-level analyses of conspiracy theories, less attention has been paid to identifying the actors that drive such narratives. We develop annotation guidelines for conspiratorial actors, present a span-annotated corpus of German Telegram posts, and investigate their automatic extraction using transformer-based models. We further apply the resulting model to the \textit{Schwurbelarchiv}, a large-scale archive of German conspiracy-related Telegram channels. Our results demonstrate that conspiratorial actors can be annotated with meaningful agreement and extracted with reasonable accuracy despite the linguistic complexity of conspiracy discourse, enabling large-scale analyses of actor representations in conspiracy narratives.

Related papers

• ActivityForensics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Localizing Manipulated Activity in Videos [62.94038307981723]
  We introduce ActivityForensics, the first large-scale benchmark for localizing manipulated activity in videos.<n>It contains over 6K forged video segments that are seamlessly blended into the video context.<n>Based on ActivityForensics, we introduce comprehensive evaluation protocols covering intra-domain, cross-domain, and open-world settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-04T18:00:05Z)
• Conspiracy Frame: a Semiotically-Driven Approach for Conspiracy Theories Detection [8.81667917459116]
  We introduce the Conspiracy Frame: a fine-grained semantic representation of conspiratorial narratives derived from frame-semantics and semiotics.<n>We observe the ability of LLMs to recognize this phenomenon in-domain and out-of-domain, investigating the role that frames may have in supporting this task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-22T18:59:59Z)
• Codified Foreshadowing-Payoff Text Generation [67.01182739162142]
  Foreshadowing and payoff are ubiquitous narrative devices through which authors introduce commitments early in a story and resolve them through concrete, observable outcomes.<n>Existing evaluations largely overlook this structural failure, focusing on surface-level coherence rather than the logical fulfillment of narrative setups.<n>We introduce Codified Foreshadowing-Payoff Generation, a novel framework that reframes narrative quality through the lens of payoff realization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T19:05:37Z)
• Do Androids Dream of Unseen Puppeteers? Probing for a Conspiracy Mindset in Large Language Models [6.909716378472136]
  We investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit conspiratorial tendencies, whether they display sociodemographic biases in this domain, and how easily they can be conditioned into adopting conspiratorial perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T18:28:28Z)
• ConspirED: A Dataset for Cognitive Traits of Conspiracy Theories and Large Language Model Safety [87.90209836101353]
  ConspirED is the first dataset of conspiratorial content annotated for general cognitive traits.<n>We develop computational models that identify conspiratorial traits and determine dominant traits in text excerpts.<n>We evaluate large language/reasoning model (LLM/LRM) robustness to conspiratorial inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T06:39:25Z)
• PropaInsight: Toward Deeper Understanding of Propaganda in Terms of Techniques, Appeals, and Intent [71.20471076045916]
  Propaganda plays a critical role in shaping public opinion and fueling disinformation.<n>Propainsight systematically dissects propaganda into techniques, arousal appeals, and underlying intent.<n>Propagaze combines human-annotated data with high-quality synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T06:28:18Z)
• Classifying Conspiratorial Narratives At Scale: False Alarms and Erroneous Connections [4.594855794205588]
  This work establishes a general scheme for classifying discussions related to conspiracy theories. We leverage human-labeled ground truth to train a BERT-based model for classifying online CTs. We present the first large-scale classification study using posts from the most active conspiracy-related Reddit forums.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T20:29:12Z)
• Codes, Patterns and Shapes of Contemporary Online Antisemitism and Conspiracy Narratives -- an Annotation Guide and Labeled German-Language Dataset in the Context of COVID-19 [0.0]
  Antisemitic and conspiracy theory content on the Internet makes data-driven algorithmic approaches essential. We develop an annotation guide for antisemitic and conspiracy theory online content in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. We provide working definitions, including specific forms of antisemitism such as encoded and post-Holocaust antisemitism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T10:32:39Z)
• Where the Earth is flat and 9/11 is an inside job: A comparative algorithm audit of conspiratorial information in web search results [62.997667081978825]
  We examine the distribution of conspiratorial information in search results across five search engines: Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and Yandex. We find that all search engines except Google consistently displayed conspiracy-promoting results and returned links to conspiracy-dedicated websites in their top results. Most conspiracy-promoting results came from social media and conspiracy-dedicated websites while conspiracy-debunking information was shared by scientific websites and, to a lesser extent, legacy media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T14:29:21Z)
• The Truth is Out There: Investigating Conspiracy Theories in Text Generation [66.01545519772527]
  We investigate the propensity for language models to generate conspiracy theory text. Our study focuses on testing these models for the elicitation of conspiracy theories. We introduce a new dataset consisting of conspiracy theory topics, machine-generated conspiracy theories, and human-written conspiracy theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T05:47:39Z)
• An automated pipeline for the discovery of conspiracy and conspiracy theory narrative frameworks: Bridgegate, Pizzagate and storytelling on the web [0.0]
  We present an automated pipeline for the discovery and description of the generative narrative frameworks of conspiracy theories on social media. We base this work on two separate repositories of posts and news articles describing the well-known conspiracy theory Pizzagate from 2016. We show how the Pizzagate framework relies on the conspiracy theorists' interpretation of "hidden knowledge" to link otherwise unlinked domains of human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-23T05:14:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.