Integrating knowledge graphs and multilingual scholarly corpora for domain-adaptive LLMs in SSH

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.05956v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 07:56:56 GMT
• Title: Integrating knowledge graphs and multilingual scholarly corpora for domain-adaptive LLMs in SSH
• Abstract summary: This paper presents an on-going use case developed within the European project LLMs4EU and the ALT-EDIC infrastructure.<n>It is aimed at adapting foundation models to SSH research practices and supporting tasks such as question answering, comparative document analysis and review.
• Score: 2.9161798034594866
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into scientific research workflows, particularly for bibliographic discovery and literature synthesis, raises significant methodological, epistemic and regulatory challenges for the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), especially with regard to disciplinary diversity, multilingual access to sources and the evaluation of results. This paper presents an on-going use case developed within the European project LLMs4EU and the ALT-EDIC infrastructure, aimed at adapting foundation models to SSH research practices and supporting tasks such as question answering, comparative document analysis and literature review. The evaluation framework follows the LLMs4EU protocol and encompasses both independent quantitative benchmarking (retrieval, summarisation, traceability and hallucination detection) and a qualitative assessment involving a panel of Digital Humanities experts. By embedding model adaptation within research infrastructures and a structured legal and ethical compliance framework, the use case explores how domain-sensitive and regulation-aware generative AI can support SSH scholarship while preserving reliability and epistemic responsibility.

Related papers

• Toward Responsible and Epistemically Grounded Multilingual LLMs for Computational Social Science and Humanities [0.7734073750595959]
  This paper reconceptualizes multilingual reasoning LLMs as interpretive instruments.<n>We develop a theoretically grounded framework for evaluating multilingual reasoning in Social Sciences and Humanities research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-30T07:52:18Z)
• LLMs in Qualitative Research: Opportunities, Limitations, and Practical Considerations [39.146761527401424]
  The paper argues that responsible integration of LLMs into qualitative requires researchers to engage critically with a curated set of technical parameters.<n>The paper situates these considerations within the design commitments of qualitative research, including reflexivity, positionality, and interpretive judgment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T18:33:46Z)
• HiSciBench: A Hierarchical Multi-disciplinary Benchmark for Scientific Intelligence from Reading to Discovery [50.8841471967624]
  HiSciBench is a hierarchical benchmark designed to evaluate foundation models across five levels that mirror the complete scientific workflow.<n>HiSciBench contains 8,735 carefully curated instances spanning six major scientific disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-28T12:08:05Z)
• Knowing Your Uncertainty -- On the application of LLM in social sciences [37.703249716862054]
  Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly being integrated into computational social science research.<n>This article argues that applying LLMs to social scientific tasks requires explicit assessment of uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T06:36:15Z)
• Disambiguation in Conversational Question Answering in the Era of LLMs and Agents: A Survey [54.90240495777929]
  Ambiguity remains a fundamental challenge in Natural Language Processing (NLP)<n>With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), addressing ambiguity has become even more critical due to their expanded capabilities and applications.<n>This paper explores the definition, forms, and implications of ambiguity for language driven systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T20:53:41Z)
• Advancing AI Research Assistants with Expert-Involved Learning [84.30323604785646]
  Large language models (LLMs) and large multimodal models (LMMs) promise to accelerate biomedical discovery, yet their reliability remains unclear.<n>We introduce ARIEL (AI Research Assistant for Expert-in-the-Loop Learning), an open-source evaluation and optimization framework.<n>We find that state-of-the-art models generate fluent but incomplete summaries, whereas LMMs struggle with detailed visual reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-03T14:21:48Z)
• TaMPERing with Large Language Models: A Field Guide for using Generative AI in Public Administration Research [0.0]
  The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into social science research presents transformative opportunities for advancing scientific inquiry.<n>This manuscript introduces the TaMPER framework-a structured methodology organized around five critical decision points: Task, Model, Prompt, Evaluation, and Reporting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T21:38:11Z)
• An Overview of Large Language Models for Statisticians [109.38601458831545]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative tools in artificial intelligence (AI)<n>This paper explores potential areas where statisticians can make important contributions to the development of LLMs.<n>We focus on issues such as uncertainty quantification, interpretability, fairness, privacy, watermarking and model adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T03:40:36Z)
• Large Language Model for Qualitative Research -- A Systematic Mapping Study [3.302912592091359]
  Large Language Models (LLMs), powered by advanced generative AI, have emerged as transformative tools.<n>This study systematically maps the literature on the use of LLMs for qualitative research.<n>Findings reveal that LLMs are utilized across diverse fields, demonstrating the potential to automate processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T21:28:00Z)
• Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning: Synthesis and Opportunities [60.34182805429511]
  Retrieval-enhancement can be extended to a broader spectrum of machine learning (ML) This work introduces a formal framework of this paradigm, Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning (REML), by synthesizing the literature in various domains in ML with consistent notations which is missing from the current literature. The goal of this work is to equip researchers across various disciplines with a comprehensive, formally structured framework of retrieval-enhanced models, thereby fostering interdisciplinary future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T20:01:21Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges [57.88520765782177]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened new avenues for assessing generated content quality, e.g., coherence, creativity, and context relevance. We propose a coherent taxonomy for organizing existing LLM-based evaluation metrics, offering a structured framework to understand and compare these methods. By discussing unresolved challenges, including bias, robustness, domain-specificity, and unified evaluation, this paper seeks to offer insights to researchers and advocate for fairer and more advanced NLG evaluation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T15:59:09Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.