Toward Responsible and Epistemically Grounded Multilingual LLMs for Computational Social Science and Humanities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00596v1
• Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 07:52:18 GMT
• Title: Toward Responsible and Epistemically Grounded Multilingual LLMs for Computational Social Science and Humanities
• Abstract summary: This paper reconceptualizes multilingual reasoning LLMs as interpretive instruments.<n>We develop a theoretically grounded framework for evaluating multilingual reasoning in Social Sciences and Humanities research.
• Score: 0.7734073750595959
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models have rapidly evolved in multilingual competence and reasoning capacity, enabling their integration into Social Sciences and Humanities research workflows. Yet existing evaluation paradigms remain anchored in task-based NLP benchmarks and fail to address interpretive validity, cultural situatedness, and epistemic mediation. This paper reconceptualizes multilingual reasoning LLMs as hermeneutic instruments that actively structure meaning production across linguistic and cultural contexts. Drawing on hermeneutics, philosophy of technology, science and technology studies, multilingual NLP research, and computational social science methodology, we develop a theoretically grounded framework for evaluating multilingual reasoning in Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) research. We articulate a rigorous experimental protocol with operationalized metrics for cultural alignment, cross-lingual stability, and reasoning faithfulness, along with transparency requirements tailored to interpretive research tasks. We illustrate the framework through a concrete application scenario involving multilingual political discourse analysis. The paper contributes a conceptual and methodological foundation for responsible integration of multilingual reasoning LLMs into computational social science infrastructures.

Related papers

• The Shape of Power: A Multilingual Framework for Social Power Reasoning in Dialogues [19.678644625110064]
  We introduce a theoretically grounded framework for studying social power in multilingual dialogue through movie screenplays.<n>We constructed an initial corpus containing 15,836 annotated instances from 100 scenes in French and Egyptian Arabic movies.<n>Our analysis reveals strong agreement on observable demographic and contextual attributes, while socially interpretive aspects, such as power asymmetry and intention alignment, remain more contested.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-28T10:05:26Z)
• Integrating knowledge graphs and multilingual scholarly corpora for domain-adaptive LLMs in SSH [2.9161798034594866]
  This paper presents an on-going use case developed within the European project LLMs4EU and the ALT-EDIC infrastructure.<n>It is aimed at adapting foundation models to SSH research practices and supporting tasks such as question answering, comparative document analysis and review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T07:56:56Z)
• Shaping Schema via Language Representation as the Next Frontier for LLM Intelligence Expanding [88.11781604392606]
  This paper defines language representation as the linguistic and symbolic constructs used to map and model the real world.<n>We argue that shaping schemas through advanced language representation is the next frontier for expanding Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T02:42:29Z)
• When Less Language is More: Language-Reasoning Disentanglement Makes LLMs Better Multilingual Reasoners [111.50503126693444]
  We show that language-specific ablation consistently boosts multilingual reasoning performance.<n>Compared to post-training, our training-free ablation achieves comparable or superior results with minimal computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T08:35:05Z)
• An Overview of Large Language Models for Statisticians [109.38601458831545]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative tools in artificial intelligence (AI)<n>This paper explores potential areas where statisticians can make important contributions to the development of LLMs.<n>We focus on issues such as uncertainty quantification, interpretability, fairness, privacy, watermarking and model adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T03:40:36Z)
• Large Language Models as Neurolinguistic Subjects: Discrepancy between Performance and Competence [49.60849499134362]
  This study investigates the linguistic understanding of Large Language Models (LLMs) regarding signifier (form) and signified (meaning)<n>We introduce a neurolinguistic approach, utilizing a novel method that combines minimal pair and diagnostic probing to analyze activation patterns across model layers.<n>We found: (1) Psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic methods reveal that language performance and competence are distinct; (2) Direct probability measurement may not accurately assess linguistic competence; and (3) Instruction tuning won't change much competence but improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T04:16:44Z)
• Toward Cultural Interpretability: A Linguistic Anthropological Framework for Describing and Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) [13.71024600466761]
  This article proposes a new integration of linguistic anthropology and machine learning (ML) We show the theoretical feasibility of a new, conjoint field of inquiry, cultural interpretability (CI) CI emphasizes how the dynamic relationship between language and culture makes contextually sensitive, open-ended conversation possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T22:01:50Z)
• Responsible Multilingual Large Language Models: A Survey of Development, Applications, and Societal Impact [5.803667039914564]
  This work bridges the gap by providing an end-to-end framework for developing and deploying MLLMs in production environments. Our findings reveal critical challenges in supporting linguistic diversity, with 88.38% of world languages categorized as low-resource. This survey provides essential guidance for practitioners and researchers working to develop more inclusive and effective multilingual AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T03:19:15Z)
• Intelligent Computing Social Modeling and Methodological Innovations in Political Science in the Era of Large Language Models [18.364402500460248]
  The recent wave of artificial intelligence, epitomized by large language models (LLMs), presents opportunities and challenges for methodological innovation in political science.<n>This paper proposes the "Intelligent Computing Social Modeling" (ICSM) method to address these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T06:30:59Z)
• Machine-assisted quantitizing designs: augmenting humanities and social sciences with artificial intelligence [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to present an unprecedented opportunity to scale up data analytics in the humanities and social sciences. We build on mixed methods quantitizing and converting design principles, and feature analysis from linguistics, to transparently integrate human expertise and machine scalability. The approach is discussed and demonstrated in over a dozen LLM-assisted case studies, covering 9 diverse languages, multiple disciplines and tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-24T14:21:50Z)
• Interactive Natural Language Processing [67.87925315773924]
  Interactive Natural Language Processing (iNLP) has emerged as a novel paradigm within the field of NLP. This paper offers a comprehensive survey of iNLP, starting by proposing a unified definition and framework of the concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:18:29Z)
• An Inclusive Notion of Text [69.36678873492373]
  We argue that clarity on the notion of text is crucial for reproducible and generalizable NLP. We introduce a two-tier taxonomy of linguistic and non-linguistic elements that are available in textual sources and can be used in NLP modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T14:26:43Z)
• Experience Grounds Language [185.73483760454454]
  Language understanding research is held back by a failure to relate language to the physical world it describes and to the social interactions it facilitates. Despite the incredible effectiveness of language processing models to tackle tasks after being trained on text alone, successful linguistic communication relies on a shared experience of the world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T16:56:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.