Context Graphs for Proactive Enterprise Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07721v1
- Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2026 14:37:23 GMT
- Title: Context Graphs for Proactive Enterprise Agents
- Abstract summary: This paper argues that genuine enterprise productivity gains require proactive agents that surface relevant, actionable information to workers before they ask.<n>We propose the Context Graph, a live relational data structure that models enterprise entities, their relationships, and state transitions over time.<n>We provide a complete end-to-end Python implementation using NetworkX and the Anthropic Claude API.
- Score: 2.3097706741644686
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and agentic frameworks have advanced enterprise AI considerably, yet agents remain fundamentally reactive: they wait for a human query before acting. This paper argues that genuine enterprise productivity gains require proactive agents: systems that surface relevant, actionable information to workers before they ask. We propose the Context Graph, a live relational data structure that models enterprise entities, their relationships, and state transitions over time. Built on this graph, we define a Delta Detection Engine that continuously monitors state changes, a Proactivity Scorer that ranks candidate insights by urgency, relevance, and persona-fit, and a Surfacing Layer powered by an LLM that delivers ranked notifications with grounded explanations. We formalize each component, derive a unified Proactivity Score function, and provide a complete end-to-end Python implementation using NetworkX and the Anthropic Claude API. Evaluation across three generic enterprise case studies (contract lifecycle management, engineering incident response, and sales pipeline hygiene) demonstrates that context-graph-driven proactivity achieves Precision@5 of 0.83, a false positive rate of 0.11, and reduces mean time to surface from 47 minutes (reactive baseline) to under 30 second.
Related papers
- Inference-Time Graph Engineering for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows [51.56038180639833]
We introduce ReActNet, a training-free framework that compiles a query and a set of role-specialized agents into a sequence of directed communication graphs.<n>We show that ReActNet consistently improves over fixed-topology and learned-topology baselines while maintaining competitive inference cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-04T23:32:11Z) - Formal Verification of Agentic Systems over Operational Data [59.98246281888422]
Agentic systems driven by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world where they act on persistent operational data.<n>Existing approaches do not provide such system-level guarantees.<n>We study here the verification of agentic systems comprising a single LLM and a tool orchestration harness over relational operational data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-04T13:01:30Z) - From Question Answering to Task Completion: A Survey on Agent System and Harness Design [67.8241530947325]
This survey examines LLM-based agents through a model-harness lens.<n>We first clarify the functional definition of agents and the implementation view of an LLM-based agent as a foundation model and an execution harness.<n>We then analyze the limits of model-centric scaling, trace four paradigms of agent engineering, and decompose the execution harness into six coupled runtime responsibilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-14T05:40:16Z) - From Privacy to Workflow Integrity: Communication-Graph Metadata in Autonomous Agent Interoperability [0.0]
A2A and MCP protocols standardize what agents say to one another, but assume address-based transport over HTTP(S)<n>What they leave in the clear is the communication graph: which agent contacts which, when, and how often.<n>We give a threat model for the agent communication graph; identify what makes agent metadata distinctively revealing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-05T11:07:55Z) - GraphMind: From Operational Traces to Self-Evolving Workflow Automation [8.929269898719822]
We present GraphMind, a system that constructs, executes, and evolves action-centric workflow graphs with minimal human effort.<n>The system has been deployed across four production cloud database services for incident investigation.<n>A 12-week field study confirms practical value: 97% of scored conversations yield actionable results within interactive latency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-17T19:22:22Z) - ClawForge: Generating Executable Interactive Benchmarks for Command-Line Agents [59.626170560327274]
We present textbfClawForge, a generator-backed benchmark framework for executable command-line categories under state conflict.<n>We instantiate this framework as the ClawForge-Bench (17 scenarios, 6 ability categories)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-13T21:34:08Z) - How to Interpret Agent Behavior [56.59836196946289]
We introduce ACT*ONOMY, a taxonomy for describing and analyzing agent behavior at runtime.<n>By providing a shared vocabulary, ACT*ONOMY helps researchers, agent designers, and end users interpret agent behavior more consistently.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-13T14:52:40Z) - AgentSim: A Platform for Verifiable Agent-Trace Simulation [3.2058241360543254]
AgentSim is an open-source platform for simulating RAG agents.<n>It generates verifiable, stepwise traces of agent reasoning over any document collection.<n>It combines a multi-model validation pipeline with an active human-in-the-loop process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-29T13:19:38Z) - ANCHOR: Branch-Point Data Generation for GUI Agents [52.22377425487]
End-to-end GUI agents for real desktop environments require large amounts of high-quality interaction data.<n>We present a trajectory expansion framework Anchor that bootstraps scalable desktop supervision from a small set of verified seed demonstrations.<n>Experiments on standard desktop benchmarks, OSWorld and WindowsAgentArena, show that models fine-tuned on our expanded corpus achieve consistent improvements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-06T19:55:26Z) - GR-Agent: Adaptive Graph Reasoning Agent under Incomplete Knowledge [26.26036702896838]
Most benchmarks assume complete knowledge graphs (KGs) where direct supporting triples exist.<n>This reduces evaluation to shallow retrieval and overlooks the reality of incomplete KGs, where many facts are missing and answers must be inferred from existing facts.<n>We propose a methodology for constructing benchmarks under KG incompleteness, which removes direct supporting triples while ensuring that alternative reasoning paths required to infer the answer remain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-16T06:11:30Z) - MAPLE: A Mobile Agent with Persistent Finite State Machines for Structured Task Reasoning [46.18718721121415]
We present MAPLE, a state-aware multi-agent framework that abstracts app interactions as a Finite State Machine (FSM)<n>We computationally model each UI screen as a discrete state and user actions as transitions, allowing the FSM to provide a structured representation of the app execution.<n> MAPLE consists of specialized agents responsible for four phases of task execution: planning, execution, verification, error recovery, and knowledge retention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T16:08:51Z) - Temporal Graph Network Embedding with Causal Anonymous Walks
Representations [54.05212871508062]
We propose a novel approach for dynamic network representation learning based on Temporal Graph Network.
For evaluation, we provide a benchmark pipeline for the evaluation of temporal network embeddings.
We show the applicability and superior performance of our model in the real-world downstream graph machine learning task provided by one of the top European banks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-19T15:39:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.