Principled Analysis of Deep Reinforcement Learning Evaluation and Design Paradigms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07769v1
• Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 16:12:14 GMT
• Title: Principled Analysis of Deep Reinforcement Learning Evaluation and Design Paradigms
• Abstract summary: We introduce the theoretical foundations of scaling laws in reinforcement learning.<n>We show that the performance of reinforcement learning algorithms does not have a monotone relationship between performance rankings and data-regimes.
• Score: 16.041484242548837
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Starting from the utilization of deep neural networks to approximate the state-action value function that led to winning one of the most challenging games, to algorithmic advancements that allowed solving problems without even explicitly stating the rules of the challenge at hand, reinforcement learning research has been the center of remarkable scientific progress for the past decade. In this paper, we focus on the key ingredients of this research progress and we analyze the canonical evaluation and design paradigms in reinforcement learning. We introduce the theoretical foundations of scaling laws in reinforcement learning and show that the asymptotic performance of reinforcement learning algorithms does not have a monotone relationship between performance rankings and data-regimes. We conduct large-scale experiments and our results demonstrate that a line of reinforcement learning research under the canonical design and evaluation paradigms resulted in incorrect conclusions. Our analysis and results provide a core analysis on scaling, capacity and complexity of deep reinforcement learning.

Related papers

• Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Benchmarks, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges [1.8499314936771558]
  This survey synthesizes recent advancements in mathematical reasoning with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our systematic review encompasses approximately 120 peer-reviewed studies and preprints, examining the evolution of this research area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T11:56:03Z)
• Faster Predictive Coding Networks via Better Initialization [52.419343840654186]
  We propose a new technique for predictive coding networks that aims to preserve the iterative progress made on previous training samples.<n>Our experiments demonstrate substantial improvements in convergence speed and final test loss in both supervised and unsupervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T08:52:19Z)
• Emergent Hierarchical Reasoning in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning [56.496001894673235]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has proven highly effective at enhancing the complex reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our analysis reveals that puzzling phenomena like aha moments", length-scaling'' and entropy dynamics are not disparate occurrences but hallmarks of an emergent reasoning hierarchy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T18:52:49Z)
• Spurious Forgetting in Continual Learning of Language Models [20.0936011355535]
  Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) reveal a perplexing phenomenon in continual learning.<n>Despite extensive training, models experience significant performance declines.<n>This study proposes that such performance drops often reflect a decline in task alignment rather than true knowledge loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T08:09:54Z)
• Unveiling the Role of Expert Guidance: A Comparative Analysis of User-centered Imitation Learning and Traditional Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  This study explores the performance, robustness, and limitations of imitation learning compared to traditional reinforcement learning methods. The insights gained from this study contribute to the advancement of human-centered artificial intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T18:07:44Z)
• Reinforcement Learning under Latent Dynamics: Toward Statistical and Algorithmic Modularity [51.40558987254471]
  Real-world applications of reinforcement learning often involve environments where agents operate on complex, high-dimensional observations. This paper addresses the question of reinforcement learning under $textitgeneral$ latent dynamics from a statistical and algorithmic perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T14:22:49Z)
• Provable Representation with Efficient Planning for Partial Observable Reinforcement Learning [74.67655210734338]
  In most real-world reinforcement learning applications, state information is only partially observable, which breaks the Markov decision process assumption. We develop a representation-based perspective that leads to a coherent framework and tractable algorithmic approach for practical reinforcement learning from partial observations. We empirically demonstrate the proposed algorithm can surpass state-of-the-art performance with partial observations across various benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T23:56:58Z)
• Dynamical Isometry based Rigorous Fair Neural Architecture Search [2.7850218655824803]
  We propose a novel neural architecture search algorithm based on dynamical isometry. We prove that our module selection strategy is rigorous fair by estimating the generalization error of all modules with well-conditioned Jacobian.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T13:01:21Z)
• Causal Reinforcement Learning: A Survey [57.368108154871]
  Reinforcement learning is an essential paradigm for solving sequential decision problems under uncertainty. One of the main obstacles is that reinforcement learning agents lack a fundamental understanding of the world. Causality offers a notable advantage as it can formalize knowledge in a systematic manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T03:00:43Z)
• Evaluation Methods and Measures for Causal Learning Algorithms [33.07234268724662]
  We focus on the two fundamental causal-inference tasks and causality-aware machine learning tasks. The survey seeks to bring to the forefront the urgency of developing publicly available benchmarks and consensus-building standards for causal learning evaluation with observational data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T00:24:34Z)
• Deep Active Learning by Leveraging Training Dynamics [57.95155565319465]
  We propose a theory-driven deep active learning method (dynamicAL) which selects samples to maximize training dynamics. We show that dynamicAL not only outperforms other baselines consistently but also scales well on large deep learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-16T16:51:05Z)
• Nonparametric Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: From Theory to Learning Algorithms [91.3755431537592]
  We analyze four broad meta-learning strategies which rely on plug-in estimation and pseudo-outcome regression. We highlight how this theoretical reasoning can be used to guide principled algorithm design and translate our analyses into practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-26T17:11:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.