A Statistical Test for the Benefits of Personalizing Interventions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08951v1
• Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 21:21:19 GMT
• Title: A Statistical Test for the Benefits of Personalizing Interventions
• Abstract summary: We introduce a statistical hypothesis test that evaluates, given historical data, evidence that a personalized intervention policy's performance will surpass the best single intervention.<n>Results on diverse datasets from job training, depression treatment, education and recommendation systems demonstrate the test's versatility and its superior performance over alternatives.
• Score: 15.472379457962075
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: From medicine to marketing to social sciences, the promise of tailoring interventions to individuals is undeniable. However, practical applications force weighing personalization's potential benefits with its possible increased cost and fragility. We introduce a statistical hypothesis test that evaluates, given historical data, evidence that a personalized intervention policy's performance will surpass deploying the best single intervention. The test maintains strict type-I error control while achieving asymptotic normality with the minimal possible variance under specified conditions. Results on diverse datasets from job training, depression treatment, education and recommendation systems demonstrate the test's versatility and its superior performance over alternatives. This test can support decision-makers throughout the intervention sciences by providing a simple and powerful quantification of the potential benefits of personalization.

Related papers

• Beyond ATE: Multi-Criteria Design for A/B Testing [16.67400872891851]
  A/B testing is a widely adopted methodology for estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) in both clinical trials and online platforms.<n>In this paper, we investigate the fundamental trade-off between social welfare loss and statistical accuracy in (adaptive) experiments with heterogeneous treatment effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-06T23:42:22Z)
• TestAgent: An Adaptive and Intelligent Expert for Human Assessment [62.060118490577366]
  We propose TestAgent, a large language model (LLM)-powered agent designed to enhance adaptive testing through interactive engagement.<n>TestAgent supports personalized question selection, captures test-takers' responses and anomalies, and provides precise outcomes through dynamic, conversational interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T16:07:54Z)
• Prediction-Powered Causal Inferences [59.98498488132307]
  We focus on Prediction-Powered Causal Inferences (PPCI)<n>We first show that conditional calibration guarantees valid PPCI at population level.<n>We then introduce a sufficient representation constraint transferring validity across experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T10:52:17Z)
• Reduced-Rank Multi-objective Policy Learning and Optimization [57.978477569678844]
  In practice, causal researchers do not have a single outcome in mind a priori. In government-assisted social benefit programs, policymakers collect many outcomes to understand the multidimensional nature of poverty. We present a data-driven dimensionality-reduction methodology for multiple outcomes in the context of optimal policy learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T08:16:30Z)
• Privacy Preserving Adaptive Experiment Design [13.839525385976303]
  We investigate the tradeoff between loss of social welfare and statistical power in contextual bandit experiment. We propose differentially private algorithms which still matches the lower bound, showing that privacy is "almost free"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T09:22:12Z)
• Designing and evaluating an online reinforcement learning agent for physical exercise recommendations in N-of-1 trials [0.9865722130817715]
  We present an innovative N-of-1 trial study design testing whether implementing a personalized intervention by an online reinforcement learning agent is feasible and effective. The results show that, first, implementing a personalized intervention by an online reinforcement learning agent is feasible. Second, such adaptive interventions have the potential to improve patients' benefits even if only few observations are available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T14:08:21Z)
• Position: AI Evaluation Should Learn from How We Test Humans [65.36614996495983]
  We argue that psychometrics, a theory originating in the 20th century for human assessment, could be a powerful solution to the challenges in today's AI evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T09:54:33Z)
• Policy Optimization for Personalized Interventions in Behavioral Health [8.10897203067601]
  Behavioral health interventions, delivered through digital platforms, have the potential to significantly improve health outcomes. We study the problem of optimizing personalized interventions for patients to maximize a long-term outcome. We present a new approach for this problem that we dub DecompPI, which decomposes the state space for a system of patients to the individual level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T21:42:03Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Instance Reweighting for Off-Policy Learning [63.31923483172859]
  We propose a Uncertainty-aware Inverse Propensity Score estimator (UIPS) for improved off-policy learning. Experiment results on synthetic and three real-world recommendation datasets demonstrate the advantageous sample efficiency of the proposed UIPS estimator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-11T11:42:26Z)
• Private Sequential Hypothesis Testing for Statisticians: Privacy, Error Rates, and Sample Size [24.149533870085175]
  We study the sequential hypothesis testing problem under a slight variant of differential privacy, known as Renyi differential privacy. We present a new private algorithm based on Wald's Sequential Probability Ratio Test (SPRT) that also gives strong theoretical privacy guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-10T04:15:50Z)
• Incorporating Expert Guidance in Epidemic Forecasting [79.91855362871496]
  We propose a new approach leveraging the Seldonian optimization framework from AI safety. We study two types of guidance: smoothness and regional consistency of errors. We show that by its successful incorporation, we are able to not only bound the probability of undesirable behavior to happen, but also to reduce RMSE on test data by up to 17%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T06:21:53Z)
• Efficient Empowerment Estimation for Unsupervised Stabilization [75.32013242448151]
  empowerment principle enables unsupervised stabilization of dynamical systems at upright positions. We propose an alternative solution based on a trainable representation of a dynamical system as a Gaussian channel. We show that our method has a lower sample complexity, is more stable in training, possesses the essential properties of the empowerment function, and allows estimation of empowerment from images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T21:10:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.