ReProAgent: Tool-Augmented Multi-Stage Agentic Generation of Bug Reproduction Tests from Issue Reports

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09123v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 06:25:18 GMT
• Title: ReProAgent: Tool-Augmented Multi-Stage Agentic Generation of Bug Reproduction Tests from Issue Reports
• Abstract summary: ReProAgent is a framework for reproduction test generation from issue reports.<n>It decomposes the task into four agent stages: bug localization, root cause analysis, test planning, and test generation.<n>Experiments on SWT-bench-lite and SWT-bench-verified show that ReProAgent successfully reproduces 58.43% and 70.30% of issues.
• Score: 27.433981940933688
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reproduction tests help developers confirm reported issues and provide executable feedback for issue resolution, yet issue reports in open-source projects rarely include such tests. Recent studies have explored generating issue reproduction tests from issue reports with large language models, but existing approaches largely rely on prompt-based pipelines that retrieve textual context and generate tests. This limits their ability to understand how reported issues behave in repository-scale codebases and to flexibly organize the construction of reproduction tests. In this paper, we propose ReProAgent, a multi-stage agent framework for reproduction test generation from issue reports. ReProAgent decomposes the task into four agent stages: bug localization, root cause analysis, test planning, and test generation. To support these stages, ReProAgent integrates task-specific tools for task decomposition and reflection, context retrieval from both textual sources and repository graphs, and runtime interaction with the execution environment. Experiments on SWT-bench-lite and SWT-bench-verified show that ReProAgent successfully reproduces 58.43% and 70.30% of issues, outperforming all baselines, with an average cost of $0.14 per instance. For example, when equipped with GPT-5-mini, ReProAgent exceeds OpenHands with the same backbone by 20.43 and 7.90 percentage points, respectively. ReProAgent also generalizes across multiple backbone LLMs and improves downstream issue resolution performance when integrated with existing repair approaches.

Related papers

• ExecCritic: Learn to Test, Test to Improve for Coding Agents [68.42713285082912]
  Execution feedback can guide coding agents toward correct repository repairs, but only when the tests capture the behavior requested by the issue.<n>We introduce ExecCritic, combining a test--verify--revise scaffold with a role-specific reinforcement learning recipe for training agents within it.<n>The scaffold separates test construction from source-code repair: a Test agent independently generates repository-native tests, a fail-closed harness qualifies and freezes them, and a Repair agent revises source code from their execution feedback without changing the tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-08T17:53:37Z)
• RefactorPlatform: An Open-Source Harness for Controlled Evaluation of Repository-Scale Refactoring Agents [0.09320657506524148]
  We present RefactorPlatform, an open-source evaluation harness that holds the environment fixed and varies each design axis.<n>Each run executes in an isolated workspace with live terminal streaming, per-task logging of tokens, diffs, and transcripts, AST-based verification, and exportable telemetry for audit and reproduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-04T08:58:10Z)
• SWE-Gate: Passing Functional Tests Is Not Enough for Software Engineering Agents [63.65682461568621]
  We introduce SWE-Gate, a repository-level benchmark for software engineering agents that explicitly evaluates review constraint compliance alongside functional correctness.<n>SWE-Gate derives review constraints from real pull request review comments and synthesizes repository-level repair instances around these constraints.<n>Each instance provides separate functional and constraint tests, together with non-compliant and gold patches, enabling explicit separation between issue resolution capability and review constraint compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-03T17:53:34Z)
• AgentRewind: Recoverable Execution for Long-Horizon LLM Agents [32.44158037765297]
  We present AgentRewind, a runtime recovery framework that records aligned checkpoints of the agent context and controlled environment.<n>We also construct MettleBench, a benchmark for evaluating task completion and partial progress on long-horizon engineering assignments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-14T15:20:35Z)
• Tencent WorkBuddy Bench: A Multi-Domain Coding-Agent Benchmark with Contamination-Resistant Task Construction [57.138342889101345]
  Tencent WorkBuddy Bench is a multi-domain evaluation suite for coding agents.<n>This report documents its construction methodology, scoring protocol, and a cross-model leaderboard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T04:34:06Z)
• ReproRepo: Scaling Reproducibility Audits with GitHub Repository Issues [54.98461672730087]
  We introduce ReproRepo, a scalable framework for evaluation that leverages human-raised GitHub issues as naturally occurring supervision on realistic reproduction blockers.<n>We instantiate ReproRepo on 1,149 recent machine learning papers from major conferences and evaluate four frontier model-agent configurations.<n>Our results show that LLM agents, even without executing code, can identify many real-world problems from paper-repository pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T17:58:05Z)
• DeployBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Research Artifact Deployment [21.93024846646044]
  LLM agents have made rapid progress on software engineering and ML research tasks, but these advances often assume access to a working runnable environment.<n>Existing environment setup benchmarks do not cover the full scope of research artifact deployment.<n>We introduce DeployBench, a benchmark of 51 research-artifact deployment tasks spanning AI/ML, computer systems, and scientific computing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T04:59:34Z)
• RepoMirage: Probing Repository Context Reasoning in Code Agents with Perturbations [51.43574078961796]
  We introduce RepoMirage, a two-stage evaluation suite built on SWE-Bench Verified.<n>RepoMirage-Perturb applies three types of semantics-preserving repository-level perturbations, revealing a clear performance drop when correct solving requires broader context access.<n>We propose RepoAnchor, a structure-first prototype workflow that separates repository exploration from downstream problem solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T06:26:43Z)
• HWE-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Real-World Hardware Bug Repair Tasks [3.958773019872771]
  Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) on isolated, component-level tasks.<n>We introduce HWE-Bench, the first large-scale, repository-level benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on real-world hardware bug repair tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T07:19:34Z)
• ClawArena: Benchmarking AI Agents in Evolving Information Environments [61.664633997138004]
  ClawArena is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents in evolving information environments.<n>Each scenario maintains a complete hidden ground truth while exposing the agent only to noisy, partial, and sometimes contradictory traces.<n> evaluation is organized around three coupled challenges: multi-source conflict reasoning, dynamic belief revision, and implicit personalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-05T17:55:23Z)
• TestExplora: Benchmarking LLMs for Proactive Bug Discovery via Repository-Level Test Generation [19.43198506241428]
  We present TestExplora, a benchmark designed to evaluate Large Language Models as proactive testers.<n>TestExplora contains 2,389 tasks from 482 repositories and hides all defect-related signals.<n>Our evaluation reveals a significant capability gap: state-of-the-art models achieve a maximum Fail-to-Pass (F2P) rate of only 16.06%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T03:22:51Z)
• DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems [48.971606069204825]
  DoVer is an intervention-driven debug framework for large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems.<n>It augments hypothesis generation with active verification through targeted interventions.<n>DoVer flips 18-28% of failed trials into successes, achieves up to 16% milestone progress, and validates or refutes 30-60% of failure hypotheses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T09:23:48Z)
• Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures [62.196870049524364]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promise in solving complex, multi-step tasks.<n>They amplify vulnerability to cascading failures, where a single root-cause error propagates through subsequent decisions.<n>Current systems lack a framework that can comprehensively understand agent error in a modular and systemic way.<n>We introduce the AgentErrorTaxonomy, a modular classification of failure modes spanning memory, reflection, planning, action, and system-level operations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T18:20:27Z)
• A Unified Debugging Approach via LLM-Based Multi-Agent Synergy [39.11825182386288]
  FixAgent is an end-to-end framework for unified debug through multi-agent synergy. It significantly outperforms state-of-the-art repair methods, fixing 1.25$times$ to 2.56$times$ bugs on the repo-level benchmark, Defects4J.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T04:55:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.