DeployBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Research Artifact Deployment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05238v1
• Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 04:59:34 GMT
• Title: DeployBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Research Artifact Deployment
• Abstract summary: LLM agents have made rapid progress on software engineering and ML research tasks, but these advances often assume access to a working runnable environment.<n>Existing environment setup benchmarks do not cover the full scope of research artifact deployment.<n>We introduce DeployBench, a benchmark of 51 research-artifact deployment tasks spanning AI/ML, computer systems, and scientific computing.
• Score: 21.93024846646044
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: LLM agents have made rapid progress on software engineering and ML research tasks, but these advances often assume access to a working runnable environment. For research artifacts released alongside published papers, setting up such an environment from a fresh machine remains a major bottleneck. Existing environment setup benchmarks do not cover the full scope of research artifact deployment, which involves multi-language toolchains, system-level dependencies beyond containers (e.g. GPU/CUDA and kernel configurations), and legacy artifact compatibility. We introduce DeployBench, a multi-domain benchmark of 51 research-artifact deployment tasks spanning AI/ML, computer systems, and scientific computing, covering all these dimensions. Each task is verified by a hidden pipeline that executes the paper's designated experiment and checks its outputs. Evaluating four state-of-the-art LLMs with OpenHands yields pass-rates from 7.8% - 51.0% . Failures are dominated by a completion-judgment problem: 97 of 154 are agent-terminated self-stops, where the agent's pre-finish checks validate a different or weaker target than the paper-specific task requires. DeployBench highlights the gap between current agents and autonomous deployment, and offers a realistic testbed for scientific research agents.

Related papers

• DuMateBench: Evaluating Autonomous Agents in Complex Real-World Workflows [69.12339622053588]
  We introduce DuMateBench, a real-session benchmark reconstructed from anonymized and privacy-screened user sessions.<n>The resulting benchmark comprises 200 tasks spanning 8 broad scenarios and 17 fine-grained capability categories.<n>We execute these tasks in isolated Docker containers injected with three forms of real-world environmental complexity: Insufficient, Unstable, and Noisy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-27T02:36:23Z)
• Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration for Unit Test Generation via Human-Testing-Inspired Workflows [18.32804849870551]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have spurred a surge of research into automated unit test generation.<n>We propose TestAgent, an LLM-based test generation approach that emulates human testing practices via a multi-agent collaboration mechanism.<n>TestAgent achieves 97.46% execution rate, 92.34% line coverage, 90.24% branch coverage, and 83.69% mutation score on six Java projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-10T05:16:54Z)
• HWE-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Real-World Hardware Bug Repair Tasks [3.958773019872771]
  Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) on isolated, component-level tasks.<n>We introduce HWE-Bench, the first large-scale, repository-level benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on real-world hardware bug repair tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T07:19:34Z)
• Ask or Assume? Uncertainty-Aware Clarification-Seeking in Coding Agents [4.301199871195023]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in open-ended domains like software engineering.<n>We evaluate the clarification-seeking abilities of LLM agents on an underspecified variant of SWE-bench Verified.<n>We propose an uncertainty-aware multi-agent scaffold that explicitly decouples underspecification detection from code execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-27T09:56:26Z)
• ResearchEnvBench: Benchmarking Agents on Environment Synthesis for Research Code Execution [44.652433226889976]
  ResearchEnvBench is a benchmark for environment synthesis in research code execution.<n>It provides a realistic testbed for advancing autonomous agents toward reproducible scientific research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T08:29:08Z)
• AIRS-Bench: a Suite of Tasks for Frontier AI Research Science Agents [49.67355440164857]
  We introduce AIRS-Bench, a suite of 20 tasks sourced from state-of-the-art machine learning papers.<n>Airs-Bench tasks assess agentic capabilities over the full research lifecycle.<n>We open-source the AIRS-Bench task definitions and evaluation code to catalyze further development in autonomous scientific research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T16:45:02Z)
• Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces [126.23612941699565]
  Terminal-Bench 2.0 is a benchmark composed of 89 tasks in computer terminal environments inspired by problems from real world.<n>We show that frontier models and agents score less than 65% on the benchmark.<n>We publish the dataset and evaluation harness to assist developers and researchers in future work at https://www.tbench.ai/.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-17T01:29:30Z)
• DetectAnyLLM: Towards Generalizable and Robust Detection of Machine-Generated Text Across Domains and Models [60.713908578319256]
  We propose Direct Discrepancy Learning (DDL) to optimize the detector with task-oriented knowledge.<n>Built upon this, we introduce DetectAnyLLM, a unified detection framework that achieves state-of-the-art MGTD performance.<n>MIRAGE samples human-written texts from 10 corpora across 5 text-domains, which are then re-generated or revised using 17 cutting-edge LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-15T10:59:57Z)
• FieldWorkArena: Agentic AI Benchmark for Real Field Work Tasks [52.47895046206854]
  FieldWorkArena is a benchmark for agentic AI targeting real-world field work.<n>This paper defines a new action space that agentic AI should possess for real world work environment benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T08:21:46Z)
• LLM Agents Making Agent Tools [2.5529148902034637]
  Tool use has turned large language models (LLMs) into powerful agents that can perform complex multi-step tasks.<n>But these tools must be implemented in advance by human developers.<n>We propose ToolMaker, an agentic framework that autonomously transforms papers with code into LLM-compatible tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T11:44:11Z)
• ML-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models and Agents for Machine Learning Tasks on Repository-Level Code [76.84199699772903]
  ML-Bench is a benchmark rooted in real-world programming applications that leverage existing code repositories to perform tasks. To evaluate both Large Language Models (LLMs) and AI agents, two setups are employed: ML-LLM-Bench for assessing LLMs' text-to-code conversion within a predefined deployment environment, and ML-Agent-Bench for testing autonomous agents in an end-to-end task execution within a Linux sandbox environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T12:03:21Z)
• MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation [96.71370747681078]
  We introduce MLAgentBench, a suite of 13 tasks ranging from improving model performance on CIFAR-10 to recent research problems like BabyLM. For each task, an agent can perform actions like reading/writing files, executing code, and inspecting outputs. We benchmark agents based on Claude v1.0, Claude v2.1, Claude v3 Opus, GPT-4, GPT-4-turbo, Gemini-Pro, and Mixtral and find that a Claude v3 Opus agent is the best in terms of success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T04:06:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.