SWE-Gate: Passing Functional Tests Is Not Enough for Software Engineering Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04167v1
• Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 17:53:34 GMT
• Title: SWE-Gate: Passing Functional Tests Is Not Enough for Software Engineering Agents
• Abstract summary: We introduce SWE-Gate, a repository-level benchmark for software engineering agents that explicitly evaluates review constraint compliance alongside functional correctness.<n>SWE-Gate derives review constraints from real pull request review comments and synthesizes repository-level repair instances around these constraints.<n>Each instance provides separate functional and constraint tests, together with non-compliant and gold patches, enabling explicit separation between issue resolution capability and review constraint compliance.
• Score: 63.65682461568621
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Repository-level software engineering benchmarks have significantly advanced the evaluation of coding agents, but existing benchmarks primarily measure whether generated patches pass functional tests and overlook review-derived acceptance constraints (review constraints) that often influence whether a patch is acceptable in real-world software development. We introduce SWE-Gate, a repository-level benchmark for software engineering agents that explicitly evaluates review constraint compliance alongside functional correctness. SWE-Gate derives review constraints from real pull request review comments and synthesizes repository-level repair instances around these constraints. Each instance provides separate functional and constraint tests, together with non-compliant and gold patches, enabling explicit separation between issue resolution capability and review constraint compliance. We construct SWE-Gate with 303 repository-level repair instances spanning 75 open-source Python repositories across diverse software domains. Experiments with four LLM backends spanning different capability levels under a common coding-agent scaffold reveal a substantial gap between functional success and success under the complete repair specification: among 644 repairs that pass the functional tests, 221 fail to satisfy the provided review constraints. These findings show that functional-only evaluation overestimates agents' ability to satisfy the full requirements of repository-level repair tasks. The replication package including code, data, and experimental results is available at https://github.com/DeepSoftwareAnalytics/SWE-Gate.

Related papers

• SWE-Bench ProMax: Benchmarking Agents on Large-Scale Multilingual Code Refactoring [31.684059339633013]
  SWE-Bench ProMax is an expert-curated, multilingual code benchmark of 170 instances drawn from real commits.<n>Every instance undergoes rigorous, multi-stage curation that addresses quality problems identified in prior benchmarks.<n>Experiments with frontier models under two agent scaffolds show that the best model achieves only 41.2% resolve rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T16:23:19Z)
• RepoZero: Can LLMs Generate a Code Repository from Scratch? [13.87780777614509]
  RepoZero is the first benchmark that enables fully automated, execution-based verification of repository-level generation from scratch.<n>Our results establish RepoZero as a challenging, scalable, and reliable testbed for end-to-end code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T01:56:02Z)
• Beyond Fixed Tests: Repository-Level Issue Resolution as Coevolution of Code and Behavioral Constraints [17.818522356206977]
  Most large language model (LLM)-based repair systems treat behavioral constraints as fixed during repair.<n>We propose Agent-CoEvo, a coevolutionary multi-agent framework in which candidate code patches and test patches are jointly explored and refined.<n>Agent-CoEvo consistently outperforms state-of-the-art agent-based and agentless baselines in both repair success and test reproduction quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T10:26:46Z)
• CCTU: A Benchmark for Tool Use under Complex Constraints [66.87622847854337]
  We introduce CCTU, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) under complex constraints.<n>The benchmark comprises 200 carefully curated and challenging test cases across diverse tool-use scenarios.<n>We develop an executable constraint validation module that performs step-level validation and enforces compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T14:05:13Z)
• RealSec-bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Secure Code Generation in Real-World Repositories [58.32028251925354]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in code generation, but their proficiency in producing secure code remains a critical, under-explored area.<n>We introduce RealSec-bench, a new benchmark for secure code generation meticulously constructed from real-world, high-risk Java repositories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T08:29:01Z)
• DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems [48.971606069204825]
  DoVer is an intervention-driven debug framework for large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems.<n>It augments hypothesis generation with active verification through targeted interventions.<n>DoVer flips 18-28% of failed trials into successes, achieves up to 16% milestone progress, and validates or refutes 30-60% of failure hypotheses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T09:23:48Z)
• SWE-fficiency: Can Language Models Optimize Real-World Repositories on Real Workloads? [22.075705411944895]
  SWE-fficiency is a benchmark for evaluating repository-level performance optimization on real workloads.<n>Our suite contains 498 tasks across nine widely used data-science, machine-learning, and HPC repositories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T17:55:09Z)
• ImpossibleBench: Measuring LLMs' Propensity of Exploiting Test Cases [58.411135609139855]
  "Shortcuts" to complete tasks pose significant risks for reliable assessment and deployment of large language models.<n>We introduce ImpossibleBench, a benchmark framework that measures LLM agents' propensity to exploit test cases.<n>As a practical framework, ImpossibleBench is not just an evaluation but a versatile tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T06:58:32Z)
• From Benchmark Data To Applicable Program Repair: An Experience Report [1.6913109767046948]
  This paper describes our approach to automated program repair.<n>We combine various techniques from the literature to achieve this.<n>Experiments show that our approach performs better than other techniques on standard benchmarks.<n>On closer inspection, none of these techniques work on realistic defects that we see in industry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T03:59:27Z)
• SOPBench: Evaluating Language Agents at Following Standard Operating Procedures and Constraints [59.645885492637845]
  SOPBench is an evaluation pipeline that transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions.<n>Our approach transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions and requires agents to call these functions based on natural language SOP descriptions.<n>We evaluate 18 leading models, and results show the task is challenging even for top-tier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T17:53:02Z)
• SolBench: A Dataset and Benchmark for Evaluating Functional Correctness in Solidity Code Completion and Repair [51.0686873716938]
  We introduce SolBench, a benchmark for evaluating the functional correctness of Solidity smart contracts generated by code completion models.<n>We propose a Retrieval-Augmented Code Repair framework to verify functional correctness of smart contracts.<n>Results show that code repair and retrieval techniques effectively enhance the correctness of smart contract completion while reducing computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T01:55:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.