ConceptSMILE: Auditing the Trustworthiness of Concept-Based Explainable AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09649v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 17:47:38 GMT
• Title: ConceptSMILE: Auditing the Trustworthiness of Concept-Based Explainable AI
• Abstract summary: ConceptSMILE is a model-agnostic perturbation-based auditing framework for evaluating the reliability of concept-based explanations.<n>We evaluate ConceptSMILE on retinal fundus images by comparing MedSAM-derived visual concepts with VLM-based semantic concepts.
• Score: 1.7827089308985398
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Concept-based explainable artificial intelligence (AI) can make model reasoning more human-understandable, but concept-level outputs are not automatically trustworthy. We introduce ConceptSMILE, a model-agnostic perturbation-based auditing framework for evaluating the reliability of concept-based explanations. Rather than replacing SMILE, ConceptSMILE extends its perturbation-based logic from feature- or region-level attribution to the auditing of human-understandable concept explanations. The framework perturbs input regions, measures concept-response shifts, applies locality weighting, and fits an XGBoost surrogate to approximate local concept behaviour. Reliability is assessed through attribution accuracy, surrogate fidelity, faithfulness, stability, and consistency. We evaluate ConceptSMILE on retinal fundus images by comparing MedSAM-derived visual concepts with VLM-based semantic concepts. Results show that reliability varies across concepts and pathways: MedSAM achieves stronger spatial attribution and the highest surrogate fidelity ($R^2 = 0.8503$, $R_w^2 = 0.8465$), while the VLM pathway shows stronger vessel faithfulness and stronger stability under selected artefact conditions. ConceptSMILE provides an independent audit layer for evaluating the trustworthiness of concept-based XAI.

Related papers

• Towards Fine-Grained and Verifiable Concept Bottleneck Models [11.236280871580155]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) offer interpretable alternatives to black-box predictors.<n>Existing CBMs struggle to verify whether predicted concepts correspond to the correct visual evidence.<n>We propose a fine-grained CBM framework that grounds each concept in localized visual evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T00:08:09Z)
• Rethinking Concept Bottleneck Models: From Pitfalls to Solutions [53.84388497227224]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) ground predictions in human-understandable concepts.<n>CBM-Suite is a methodological framework to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T19:37:49Z)
• Concept Component Analysis: A Principled Approach for Concept Extraction in LLMs [51.378834857406325]
  Mechanistic interpretability seeks to mitigate the issues through extracts from large language models.<n>Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a popular approach for extracting interpretable and monosemantic concepts.<n>We show that SAEs suffer from a fundamental theoretical ambiguity: the well-defined correspondence between LLM representations and human-interpretable concepts remains unclear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T09:27:05Z)
• FaCT: Faithful Concept Traces for Explaining Neural Network Decisions [56.796533084868884]
  Deep networks have shown remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks, yet getting a global concept-level understanding of how they function remains a key challenge.<n>We put emphasis on the faithfulness of concept-based explanations and propose a new model with model-inherent mechanistic concept-explanations.<n>Our concepts are shared across classes and, from any layer, their contribution to the logit and their input-visualization can be faithfully traced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T13:35:46Z)
• Interpretable Reward Modeling with Active Concept Bottlenecks [54.00085739303773]
  We introduce Concept Bottleneck Reward Models (CB-RM), a reward modeling framework that enables interpretable preference learning.<n>Unlike standard RLHF methods that rely on opaque reward functions, CB-RM decomposes reward prediction into human-interpretable concepts.<n>We formalize an active learning strategy that dynamically acquires the most informative concept labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T06:26:04Z)
• Interpretability Illusions with Sparse Autoencoders: Evaluating Robustness of Concept Representations [23.993903128858832]
  We develop an evaluation framework featuring realistic scenarios in which adversarial perturbations are crafted to manipulate SAE representations.<n>We find that tiny adversarial input perturbations can effectively manipulate concept-based interpretations in most scenarios.<n>Overall, our results suggest that SAE concept representations are fragile and may be ill-suited for applications in model monitoring and oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T20:42:05Z)
• Towards Robust and Reliable Concept Representations: Reliability-Enhanced Concept Embedding Model [22.865870813626316]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) aim to enhance interpretability by predicting human-understandable concepts as intermediates for decision-making.<n>Two inherent issues contribute to concept unreliability: sensitivity to concept-irrelevant features and lack of semantic consistency for the same concept across different samples.<n>We propose the Reliability-Enhanced Concept Embedding Model (RECEM), which introduces a two-fold strategy: Concept-Level Disentanglement to separate irrelevant features from concept-relevant information and a Concept Mixup mechanism to ensure semantic alignment across samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T09:29:39Z)
• On the Fairness, Diversity and Reliability of Text-to-Image Generative Models [68.62012304574012]
  multimodal generative models have sparked critical discussions on their reliability, fairness and potential for misuse.<n>We propose an evaluation framework to assess model reliability by analyzing responses to global and local perturbations in the embedding space.<n>Our method lays the groundwork for detecting unreliable, bias-injected models and tracing the provenance of embedded biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T09:46:55Z)
• Improving Intervention Efficacy via Concept Realignment in Concept Bottleneck Models [57.86303579812877]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) ground image classification on human-understandable concepts to allow for interpretable model decisions. Existing approaches often require numerous human interventions per image to achieve strong performances. We introduce a trainable concept realignment intervention module, which leverages concept relations to realign concept assignments post-intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:59:01Z)
• On the Concept Trustworthiness in Concept Bottleneck Models [39.928868605678744]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) break down the reasoning process into the input-to-concept mapping and the concept-to-label prediction. Despite the transparency of the concept-to-label prediction, the mapping from the input to the intermediate concept remains a black box. A pioneering metric, referred to as concept trustworthiness score, is proposed to gauge whether the concepts are derived from relevant regions. An enhanced CBM is introduced, enabling concept predictions to be made specifically from distinct parts of the feature map.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T12:24:53Z)
• Do Concept Bottleneck Models Respect Localities? [14.77558378567965]
  Concept-based explainability methods use human-understandable intermediaries to produce explanations for machine learning models.<n>We assess whether concept predictors leverage "relevant" features to make predictions, a term we call locality.<n>We find that many concept-based models used in practice fail to respect localities because concept predictors cannot always clearly distinguish distinct concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T16:05:23Z)
• Evaluating the Stability of Semantic Concept Representations in CNNs for Robust Explainability [0.0]
  This paper focuses on two stability goals when working with concept representations in computer vision CNNs. The guiding use-case is a post-hoc explainability framework for object detection CNNs. We propose a novel metric that considers both concept separation and consistency, and is to layer and concept representation dimensionality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T14:14:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.