Evaluating the Stability of Semantic Concept Representations in CNNs for Robust Explainability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14864v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 14:14:00 GMT
• Title: Evaluating the Stability of Semantic Concept Representations in CNNs for Robust Explainability
• Authors: Georgii Mikriukov, Gesina Schwalbe, Christian Hellert and Korinna Bade
• Abstract summary: This paper focuses on two stability goals when working with concept representations in computer vision CNNs. The guiding use-case is a post-hoc explainability framework for object detection CNNs. We propose a novel metric that considers both concept separation and consistency, and is to layer and concept representation dimensionality.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Analysis of how semantic concepts are represented within Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is a widely used approach in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for interpreting CNNs. A motivation is the need for transparency in safety-critical AI-based systems, as mandated in various domains like automated driving. However, to use the concept representations for safety-relevant purposes, like inspection or error retrieval, these must be of high quality and, in particular, stable. This paper focuses on two stability goals when working with concept representations in computer vision CNNs: stability of concept retrieval and of concept attribution. The guiding use-case is a post-hoc explainability framework for object detection (OD) CNNs, towards which existing concept analysis (CA) methods are successfully adapted. To address concept retrieval stability, we propose a novel metric that considers both concept separation and consistency, and is agnostic to layer and concept representation dimensionality. We then investigate impacts of concept abstraction level, number of concept training samples, CNN size, and concept representation dimensionality on stability. For concept attribution stability we explore the effect of gradient instability on gradient-based explainability methods. The results on various CNNs for classification and object detection yield the main findings that (1) the stability of concept retrieval can be enhanced through dimensionality reduction via data aggregation, and (2) in shallow layers where gradient instability is more pronounced, gradient smoothing techniques are advised. Finally, our approach provides valuable insights into selecting the appropriate layer and concept representation dimensionality, paving the way towards CA in safety-critical XAI applications.

Related papers

• Towards Robust and Reliable Concept Representations: Reliability-Enhanced Concept Embedding Model [22.865870813626316]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) aim to enhance interpretability by predicting human-understandable concepts as intermediates for decision-making. Two inherent issues contribute to concept unreliability: sensitivity to concept-irrelevant features and lack of semantic consistency for the same concept across different samples. We propose the Reliability-Enhanced Concept Embedding Model (RECEM), which introduces a two-fold strategy: Concept-Level Disentanglement to separate irrelevant features from concept-relevant information and a Concept Mixup mechanism to ensure semantic alignment across samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T09:29:39Z)
• Concept-Based Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Metrics and Benchmarks [0.0]
  Concept-based explanation methods aim to improve the interpretability of machine learning models. We propose three metrics: the concept global importance metric, the concept existence metric, and the concept location metric. We demonstrate that, in many cases, even the most important concepts determined by post-hoc CBMs are not present in input images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T16:32:36Z)
• Visual-TCAV: Concept-based Attribution and Saliency Maps for Post-hoc Explainability in Image Classification [3.9626211140865464]
  Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have seen significant performance improvements in recent years. However, due to their size and complexity, they function as black-boxes, leading to transparency concerns. This paper introduces a novel post-hoc explainability framework, Visual-TCAV, which aims to bridge the gap between these methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T16:52:52Z)
• Rigorous Probabilistic Guarantees for Robust Counterfactual Explanations [80.86128012438834]
  We show for the first time that computing the robustness of counterfactuals with respect to plausible model shifts is NP-complete. We propose a novel probabilistic approach which is able to provide tight estimates of robustness with strong guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T09:13:11Z)
• Improving Intervention Efficacy via Concept Realignment in Concept Bottleneck Models [57.86303579812877]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) ground image classification on human-understandable concepts to allow for interpretable model decisions. Existing approaches often require numerous human interventions per image to achieve strong performances. We introduce a trainable concept realignment intervention module, which leverages concept relations to realign concept assignments post-intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:59:01Z)
• Implicit Concept Removal of Diffusion Models [92.55152501707995]
  Text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models often inadvertently generate unwanted concepts such as watermarks and unsafe images. We present the Geom-Erasing, a novel concept removal method based on the geometric-driven control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T17:13:10Z)
• Understanding and Enhancing Robustness of Concept-based Models [41.20004311158688]
  We study robustness of concept-based models to adversarial perturbations. In this paper, we first propose and analyze different malicious attacks to evaluate the security vulnerability of concept based models. We then propose a potential general adversarial training-based defense mechanism to increase robustness of these systems to the proposed malicious attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T10:43:51Z)
• I saw, I conceived, I concluded: Progressive Concepts as Bottlenecks [2.9398911304923447]
  Concept bottleneck models (CBMs) provide explainability and intervention during inference by correcting predicted, intermediate concepts. This makes CBMs attractive for high-stakes decision-making. We take the quality assessment of fetal ultrasound scans as a real-life use case for CBM decision support in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T09:31:19Z)
• Interpretable Self-Aware Neural Networks for Robust Trajectory Prediction [50.79827516897913]
  We introduce an interpretable paradigm for trajectory prediction that distributes the uncertainty among semantic concepts. We validate our approach on real-world autonomous driving data, demonstrating superior performance over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T06:28:20Z)
• Modeling Temporal Concept Receptive Field Dynamically for Untrimmed Video Analysis [105.06166692486674]
  We study temporal concept receptive field of concept-based event representation. We introduce temporal dynamic convolution (TDC) to give stronger flexibility to concept-based event analytics. Different coefficients can generate appropriate and accurate temporal concept receptive field size according to input videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-23T04:59:48Z)
• A general framework for defining and optimizing robustness [74.67016173858497]
  We propose a rigorous and flexible framework for defining different types of robustness properties for classifiers. Our concept is based on postulates that robustness of a classifier should be considered as a property that is independent of accuracy. We develop a very general robustness framework that is applicable to any type of classification model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T13:24:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.