Uncovering Students' Mental Models of Generative Artificial Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11692v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 15:25:45 GMT
• Title: Uncovering Students' Mental Models of Generative Artificial Intelligence
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a study of students' mental models of generative AI (GenAI)<n>A student's mental model of GenAI influences not only how they perceive the technology's capabilities and limitations but also how they choose to integrate it into their academic work.
• Score: 0.6736390862233058
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper we present a study of students' mental models of generative AI (GenAI). A student's mental model of GenAI influences not only how they perceive the technology's capabilities and limitations but also how they choose to integrate it into their academic work. Whether they view it as a collaborative partner, a shortcut to complete tasks, or something in between, depends on how they conceptualize its use. This study addresses the following questions: (I) What mental models do undergraduate students hold about GenAI? and (II) What aspects of conceptual knowledge - declarative, procedural, and conditional - are present in these mental models? Sixty-four concept maps were collected from students enrolled in a course on technology ethics. Students were asked to construct concept maps representing their understanding of GenAI use. The concept maps were analyzed using a structured codebook and the analysis revealed five categories of mental models: technical process based, educational tool based, transition model, consequence aware model, integrated model. Declarative knowledge was most dominant across maps, suggesting that students largely understood GenAI primarily at a surface level - knowing its names, tools, and applications but demonstrate limited procedural understanding of how it works and limited conditional knowledge about when and why it should or should not be used. By identifying students' mental models, we can improve students' AI literacy by designing curriculum and guidelines that improve cognition while ensuring responsible and ethical use.

Related papers

• Quick Build, Careful Check? Generative AI Use in Hackathons [83.0493885475068]
  We report an exploratory interview study with participants at an AI-themed hackathon in central Europe.<n>We found that participants used GenAI for purposes beyond coding, including learning unfamiliar topics, brainstorming, and preparing documentation.<n>We also found that all participants converged on an unwritten practice of checking GenAI output before using it, yet their ability to actually verify was constrained by time pressure and limited domain knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T08:59:18Z)
• The GenAI Skill Bypass: Mapping Divergent Pathways of University Students and Staff AI Literacy [0.9039347265533652]
  Higher education institutions are increasingly expected to ensure that both students and staff develop Generative AI (GenAI)<n>Current educational frameworks typically assume a linear progression of GenAI literacy.<n>This paper challenges such an assumption through a psychometric analysis of a taxonomy-based self-assessment instrument.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T06:53:39Z)
• Patterns of Learner-AI Interaction and Academic Performance in an Object-Oriented Programming Course [0.0]
  This research paper examines how different forms of learner-AI interaction relate to learning outcomes in object-oriented programming (OOP) courses.<n>Survey data were collected from 210 undergraduate students enrolled in a first-year OOP course.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T07:48:00Z)
• Exploring Student Perception on Gen AI Adoption in Higher Education: A Descriptive Study [1.978884131103313]
  This study examines how students perceive, use, and evaluate Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)<n>Data were collected through a questionnaire administered to 436 postgraduate Computer Science students at the University of Hertfordshire.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-29T17:19:39Z)
• Mind the Ethics! The Overlooked Ethical Dimensions of GenAI in Software Modeling Education [1.5720842327670732]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly gaining momentum in software modeling education.<n>We conduct a systematic literature review across six major digital libraries in computer science.<n>We identify studies discussing the ethical aspects of GenAI in software modeling education, including responsibility, fairness, transparency, diversity, and inclusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T10:46:12Z)
• Integrating Universal Generative AI Platforms in Educational Labs to Foster Critical Thinking and Digital Literacy [0.3749861135832073]
  This paper presents a new educational framework for integrating generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) platforms into laboratory activities.<n> Recognizing the limitations and risks of uncritical reliance on large language models (LLMs), the proposed pedagogical model reframes GenAI as a research subject and cognitive tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T17:45:51Z)
• From Recall to Reasoning: Automated Question Generation for Deeper Math Learning through Large Language Models [44.99833362998488]
  We investigated the first steps for optimizing content creation for advanced math.<n>We looked at the ability of GenAI to produce high-quality practice problems that are relevant to the course content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T08:30:10Z)
• Machine Learning: a Lecture Note [51.31735291774885]
  This lecture note is intended to prepare early-year master's and PhD students in data science or a related discipline with foundational ideas in machine learning.<n>It starts with basic ideas in modern machine learning with classification as a main target task.<n>Based on these basic ideas, the lecture note explores in depth the probablistic approach to unsupervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T16:03:41Z)
• Early Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Computing Education: Emergent Student Use Cases and Perspectives in 2023 [38.83649319653387]
  There is limited prior research on computing students' use and perceptions of GenAI. We surveyed all computer science majors in a small engineering-focused R1 university. We discuss the impact of our findings on the emerging conversation around GenAI and education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-17T20:17:47Z)
• Misconceptions, Pragmatism, and Value Tensions: Evaluating Students' Understanding and Perception of Generative AI for Education [0.11704154007740832]
  Students are early adopters of the technology, utilizing it in atypical ways. Students were asked to describe 1) their understanding of GenAI; 2) their use of GenAI; 3) their opinions on the benefits, downsides, and ethical issues pertaining to its use in education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T17:41:06Z)
• Towards Human Cognition Level-based Experiment Design for Counterfactual Explanations (XAI) [68.8204255655161]
  The emphasis of XAI research appears to have turned to a more pragmatic explanation approach for better understanding. An extensive area where cognitive science research may substantially influence XAI advancements is evaluating user knowledge and feedback. We propose a framework to experiment with generating and evaluating the explanations on the grounds of different cognitive levels of understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T19:20:22Z)
• Investigating Explainability of Generative AI for Code through Scenario-based Design [44.44517254181818]
  generative AI (GenAI) technologies are maturing and being applied to application domains such as software engineering. We conduct 9 workshops with 43 software engineers in which real examples from state-of-the-art generative AI models were used to elicit users' explainability needs. Our work explores explainability needs for GenAI for code and demonstrates how human-centered approaches can drive the technical development of XAI in novel domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T08:52:39Z)
• Formalising Concepts as Grounded Abstractions [68.24080871981869]
  This report shows how representation learning can be used to induce concepts from raw data. The main technical goal of this report is to show how techniques from representation learning can be married with a lattice-theoretic formulation of conceptual spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-13T15:22:01Z)
• Explainable Active Learning (XAL): An Empirical Study of How Local Explanations Impact Annotator Experience [76.9910678786031]
  We propose a novel paradigm of explainable active learning (XAL), by introducing techniques from the recently surging field of explainable AI (XAI) into an Active Learning setting. Our study shows benefits of AI explanation as interfaces for machine teaching--supporting trust calibration and enabling rich forms of teaching feedback, and potential drawbacks--anchoring effect with the model judgment and cognitive workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-24T22:52:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.