Do AI Agents Know When a Task Is Simple? Toward Complexity-Aware Reasoning and Execution

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13034v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 17:59:31 GMT
• Title: Do AI Agents Know When a Task Is Simple? Toward Complexity-Aware Reasoning and Execution
• Abstract summary: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate multi-step engineering and informatics.<n>They often follow a maximum-context-first strategy--re-reading files and dependencies they have already seen--turning a one-line edit into a small code-base audit.<n>We argue the missing capability is task-aware execution-scope estimation.
• Score: 1.733151600403503
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate multi-step engineering and informatics workflows, yet they rarely ask how much effort a task actually requires. They often follow a maximum-context-first strategy--re-reading files and dependencies they have already seen--turning a one-line edit into a small code-base audit. We argue the missing capability is task-aware execution-scope estimation: judging a task's difficulty, the information it truly needs, and the shortest reliable path before committing budget. We formalize minimum-sufficient execution and the Agent Cognitive Redundancy Ratio (ACRR), and propose E3 (Estimate, Execute, Expand): the agent estimates an initial operating point, executes a minimum viable path, and expands scope only when verification fails. On MSE-Bench--a deterministic benchmark of 121 edits in a capability-controlled simulator--E3 matches the strongest baseline's 100% success while cutting cost by 85%, tokens by 91%, and inspected files by 92%, and further beats a strong adaptive retrieval baseline by 16%; the gains survive held-out instruction wording and essentially every cost weighting. A companion real-model harness (LLM-Case) corroborates the effect on a live gpt-4o agent editing a real open-source library, with every candidate patch graded by actually running the project's real pytest suite against a measured oracle: the over-reading is milder but real, and E3 is the leanest and fastest policy at comparable task success--its one shortfall a provider rate-limit, not a wrong edit. We frame this as a controlled probe of execution redundancy, not a measurement of any deployed agent, and position task-aware execution as a step toward engineering-grounded AI (EGAI)--agents whose effort is anchored in the engineering reality of the task. We release the framework and benchmark.

Related papers

• AgentAbstain: Do LLM Agents Know When Not to Act? [19.223843408018997]
  Existing evaluations mostly focus on task success rather than whether agents know when to abstain.<n>We present the first systematic evaluation framework for agentic abstention: the calibrated ability of tool-using LLM agents to recognize when not to act.<n>AgentAbstain is a paired-task benchmark built on an agent-native taxonomy of 8 abstention scenarios across pre-execution reasoning and runtime discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-11T00:57:36Z)
• RigorBench: Benchmarking Engineering Process Discipline in Autonomous AI Coding Agents [0.0]
  RigorBench is the first benchmark to measure process discipline in AI coding agents.<n>It evaluates harnesses across five pillars: Planning Fidelity, Verification Coverage, Recovery Efficiency, Abstention Quality, and Atomic Transition Integrity.<n>Our results show that structured process discipline improves process quality scores by an average of 41% and raises downstream outcome correctness by 17%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-21T21:41:34Z)
• ORAgentBench: Can LLM Agents Solve Challenging Operations Research Tasks End to End? [28.383940617377856]
  We introduce ORAgentBench, an execution-grounded benchmark for evaluating autonomous agents on operations research tasks.<n>It contains 107 human-reviewed tasks across diverse operational scenarios, each packaged with a natural-language brief, multi-file data, configuration artifacts, and a required submission schema.<n>Experiments with fourteen frontier agent-model configurations show that current agents remain far from reliable OR practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T04:43:23Z)
• AISE-Bench: A Full-Cycle Curated Benchmark for Information Seeking on Academic Knowledge Graphs [55.8213573429699]
  AISE-Bench is a real-world, full-cycle annotated benchmark for information seeking on academic knowledge graphs.<n>AISE-Bench release contains 1,133 QA pairs, including query, full API execution, validated parameters, and source-grounded answers with reference links.<n>We develop a comprehensive evaluation protocol measuring answer quality, reference grounding, API-planning correctness, and execution success.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T07:59:46Z)
• GTA-2: Benchmarking General Tool Agents from Atomic Tool-Use to Open-Ended Workflows [90.35728421223673]
  GTA-2 is a hierarchical benchmark for General Tool Agents (GTA)<n>Built on real-world authenticity, it leverages real user queries, deployed tools, and multimodal contexts.<n>Experiments reveal a pronounced capability cliff: while frontier models already struggle on atomic tasks, top models achieving only 14.39% success.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T05:36:00Z)
• AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents [50.481033105867205]
  We introduce AgentProcessBench, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating step-level effectiveness in realistic, tool-augmented trajectories.<n>The benchmark comprises 1,000 diverse trajectories and 8,509 human-labeled step annotations with 89.1% inter-annotator agreement.<n>It features a ternary labeling scheme to capture exploration and an error propagation rule to reduce labeling ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-15T16:13:58Z)
• Ares: Adaptive Reasoning Effort Selection for Efficient LLM Agents [30.48395228595732]
  Ares is a framework for per-step dynamic reasoning effort selection tailored for multi-step agent tasks.<n>We develop a data generation pipeline that identifies the minimum reasoning effort required for successful step completion.<n>We evaluate Ares on a diverse set of agent tasks, including TAU-Bench for tool use agents, BrowseComp-Plus for deep-research agents, and WebArena for web agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T03:17:29Z)
• AgentPRM: Process Reward Models for LLM Agents via Step-Wise Promise and Progress [71.02263260394261]
  Large language models (LLMs) still encounter challenges in multi-turn decision-making tasks.<n>We build process reward models (PRMs) to evaluate each decision and guide the agent's decision-making process.<n>AgentPRM captures both the interdependence between sequential decisions and their contribution to the final goal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T14:57:54Z)
• Alita-G: Self-Evolving Generative Agent for Agent Generation [54.49365835457433]
  We present ALITA-G, a framework that transforms a general-purpose agent into a domain expert.<n>In this framework, a generalist agent executes a curated suite of target-domain tasks.<n>It attains strong gains while reducing computation costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T17:59:14Z)
• Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation [87.47155146067962]
  We provide a standardized evaluation harness that orchestrates parallel evaluations across hundreds of tasks.<n>We conduct three-dimensional analysis spanning models, scaffolds, and benchmarks.<n>Our analysis reveals surprising insights, such as higher reasoning effort reducing accuracy in the majority of runs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T22:22:28Z)
• Visual Document Understanding and Question Answering: A Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework with Test-Time Scaling [83.78874399606379]
  We propose MACT, a Multi-Agent Collaboration framework with Test-Time scaling.<n>It comprises four distinct small-scale agents, with clearly defined roles and effective collaboration.<n>It shows superior performance with a smaller parameter scale without sacrificing the ability of general and mathematical tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T12:52:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.