Safe Overtaking for Autonomous Racing Using Hierarchical Optimization and Learning-Based Control

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13348v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:19:14 GMT
• Title: Safe Overtaking for Autonomous Racing Using Hierarchical Optimization and Learning-Based Control
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a hierarchical overtaking framework that separates maneuver-level decision making from safety-certified trajectory control.<n>A reinforcement learning policy adapts the discrete-time CBF decay parameter online, enabling context-dependent modulation of safety margins without directly controlling vehicle inputs.
• Score: 14.05083688629287
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous racing overtaking requires balancing competitive performance with safety under nonlinear vehicle dynamics and real-time constraints. Model Predictive Control (MPC) combined with Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) provides a principled mechanism for certifying forward invariance of a safe set. However, commonly used fixed-decay discrete-time CBF formulations can become overly conservative in interactive racing scenarios, limiting overtaking performance and requiring manual tuning across track conditions. This paper proposes a hierarchical overtaking framework that explicitly separates maneuver-level decision making from safety-certified trajectory control, reducing conservatism while preserving safety. A high-level Mixed-Integer Quadratic Program (MIQP) resolves the combinatorial passing-side selection problem by selecting a feasible overtaking topology, while a nonlinear Frenet-frame MPC enforces vehicle dynamics and safety through embedded discrete-time CBF constraints. This decomposition isolates the combinatorial complexity of maneuver selection from the continuous trajectory optimization. To further mitigate the sensitivity of fixed-decay barrier constraints, a reinforcement learning policy adapts the discrete-time CBF decay parameter online, enabling context-dependent modulation of safety margins without directly controlling vehicle inputs. Simulation and scaled-hardware experiments show that no single fixed decay parameter achieves uniformly strong performance across tracks, whereas the adaptive strategy attains the highest aggregate success rate and consistently strong safety--performance trade-offs without per-track tuning, improving robustness to environment variation while maintaining safety constraint satisfaction in nominal operation.

Related papers

• A Risk-Sensitive and Uncertainty-Aware Decision-Making and Control Framework for Safe and Robust Autonomous Driving [17.14182217508567]
  We propose a Risk-sensitive and Uncertainty-aware Decision-making and Control (RUDC) framework for safe and robust autonomous driving.<n>An uncertainty-aware high-order control barrier function (HOCBF)-based safety correction mechanism adaptively adjusts constraint strictness according to policy uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T03:03:19Z)
• Optimal Reward Shaping: Autonomous Car Parking Case Study [1.1458853556386799]
  We present a parameterized reward shaping framework featuring alignment feedback, drive-direction switch regularization, and an aligned episode termination mechanism evaluated on an autonomous parallel parking task.<n>By employing surrogate-based Bayesian optimization, our co-optimized Deep Q-Network (DQN) agent resolves characteristic control failure modes, significantly outperforming uncalibrated baselines across both success rate and trajectory smoothness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-26T11:49:23Z)
• Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning for Emergency Collision Avoidance [13.82721066487409]
  This paper proposes a safe reinforcement learning framework guided by a Hamilton-Jacobi reachability based motion safety set.<n>The proposed method achieves higher goal-reaching rates, produces smoother avoidance maneuvers, and maintains larger unified safety margins than baseline methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-13T13:57:30Z)
• Cooptimizing Safety and Performance Using Safety Value-Constrained Model Predictive Control [14.944399584182017]
  We propose a safety-value function-based terminal constraint that enforces membership in a control-invariant safe set at the end of each planning horizon.<n>This formulation enables real-time synthesis of trajectories that are both high-performing and provably safe.<n>We validate the proposed framework through simulation and hardware experiments on a Flexiv Rizon 10s manipulator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T20:10:03Z)
• Response-Aware Risk-Constrained Control Barrier Function With Application to Vehicles [0.0]
  This paper proposes a unified control framework based on Response-Aware Risk-Constrained Control Barrier Function for dynamic safety boundary control of vehicles.<n>The framework fuses nominal dynamics priors with direct vehicle body responses to provide a baseline direction for control gradients.<n>It also reformulates traditional deterministic safety constraints into probabilistic constraints on the tail risk of barrier function derivatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T02:38:17Z)
• SEP-NMPC: Safety Enhanced Passivity-Based Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for a UAV Slung Payload System [3.5382023072762188]
  This paper introduces a Safety Enhanced Passivity-Based MPC (SEP-NMPC) that provides formal guarantees of stability and safety for a quadrotor transporting a payload through cluttered environments.<n> Stability is enforced by embedding a strict passivity inequality, which is derived from a shaped energy storage function with adaptive damping.<n>Safety is guaranteed through high-order control barrier functions (HOCBFs) that render user-defined clearance sets forward-invariant, obliging both the quadrotor and the swinging payload to maintain separation while interacting with static and dynamic obstacles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T19:20:08Z)
• BarrierSteer: LLM Safety via Learning Barrier Steering [83.12893815611052]
  BarrierSteer is a novel framework that formalizes safety by embedding learned non-linear safety constraints directly into the model's latent representation space.<n>We show that BarrierSteer substantially reduces adversarial success rates, decreases unsafe generations, and outperforms existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T18:19:46Z)
• PoSafeNet: Safe Learning with Poset-Structured Neural Nets [49.854863600271614]
  existing approaches often enforce multiple safety constraints uniformly or via fixed priority orders, leading to infeasibility and brittle behavior.<n>We formalize this setting as poset-structured safety, modeling safety constraints as a partially ordered set and treating safety composition as a structural property of the policy class.<n>Building on this formulation, we propose PoSafeNet, a differentiable neural safety layer that enforces safety via sequential closed-form projection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T22:03:32Z)
• Learning Performance-Oriented Control Barrier Functions Under Complex Safety Constraints and Limited Actuation [5.62479170374811]
  Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) provide an elegant framework for constraining nonlinear control system dynamics. We introduce a novel self-supervised learning framework to comprehensively address these challenges. We validate our approach on a 2D double integrator (DI) system and a 7D fixed-wing aircraft system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T02:51:49Z)
• Safe Neural Control for Non-Affine Control Systems with Differentiable Control Barrier Functions [58.19198103790931]
  This paper addresses the problem of safety-critical control for non-affine control systems. It has been shown that optimizing quadratic costs subject to state and control constraints can be sub-optimally reduced to a sequence of quadratic programs (QPs) by using Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) We incorporate higher-order CBFs into neural ordinary differential equation-based learning models as differentiable CBFs to guarantee safety for non-affine control systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T05:35:48Z)
• Enforcing Hard Constraints with Soft Barriers: Safe Reinforcement Learning in Unknown Stochastic Environments [84.3830478851369]
  We propose a safe reinforcement learning approach that can jointly learn the environment and optimize the control policy. Our approach can effectively enforce hard safety constraints and significantly outperform CMDP-based baseline methods in system safe rate measured via simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-29T20:49:25Z)
• Pointwise Feasibility of Gaussian Process-based Safety-Critical Control under Model Uncertainty [77.18483084440182]
  Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) and Control Lyapunov Functions (CLFs) are popular tools for enforcing safety and stability of a controlled system, respectively. We present a Gaussian Process (GP)-based approach to tackle the problem of model uncertainty in safety-critical controllers that use CBFs and CLFs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-13T23:08:49Z)
• Learning Control Barrier Functions from Expert Demonstrations [69.23675822701357]
  We propose a learning based approach to safe controller synthesis based on control barrier functions (CBFs) We analyze an optimization-based approach to learning a CBF that enjoys provable safety guarantees under suitable Lipschitz assumptions on the underlying dynamical system. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first results that learn provably safe control barrier functions from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T12:29:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.