StructureClaw: Traceable LLM Agents and an Executable Benchmark for Structural Engineering Workflows

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14896v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:13:41 GMT
• Title: StructureClaw: Traceable LLM Agents and an Executable Benchmark for Structural Engineering Workflows
• Abstract summary: We present StructureClaw, an artifact-centered workbench for structural engineering requests.<n>We also introduce StructureClaw-Bench, an executable benchmark of 150 controlled scenarios.<n>Across ten agent-model configurations, each evaluated on the same 50 standard cases, the average Success Rate rises from 56.8% with the generic-skill baseline to 88.6% with the full automatic workflow.
• Score: 15.552044829103373
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Addressing a structural-engineering request requires more than a single answer; it requires a chain of interdependent artifacts: interpreted requirements, a computable model, validation records, solver outputs, code-check records, and a final report. Evaluations centered on question answering or script generation rarely verify this complete evidence chain and may therefore reward fluent outputs even when the underlying engineering workflow is incomplete, internally inconsistent, or non-executable. To address this limitation, we present StructureClaw, an artifact-centered workbench in which LLM agents operate through governed engineering skills, typed tools, shared artifact state, and local analysis backends. We also introduce StructureClaw-Bench, an executable benchmark of 150 controlled scenarios spanning standard workflow execution, interactive robustness, and multimodal structural-model reconstruction. A scenario succeeds only when all required artifact- and execution-level assertions pass in a single run. Across ten agent-model configurations, each evaluated on the same 50 standard cases, the average Success Rate rises from 56.8% with the generic-skill baseline to 88.6% with the full automatic workflow. The interactive and multimodal evaluations identify two prominent remaining challenges: safe handling of invalid numerical inputs and fixture-consistent reconstruction of structural models. These findings show that artifact-centered evaluation can expose workflow-level failures that are difficult to identify from final responses alone, providing a more rigorous basis for evaluating and improving structural-engineering agents. The code and benchmark are available at https://github.com/structureclaw/structureclaw.

Related papers

• MTAC-IFBench: Benchmarking Instruction-Following in Multi-Turn Agentic Coding [83.0805548642958]
  MTAC-IFBench is a comprehensive benchmark for instruction-following in software development.<n>It features multi-turn progressive software development instructions with diverse constraints spanning 6 primary and 18 secondary categories.<n>MTAC-IFBench identifies significant deficiencies in existing code agents in multi-turn instruction-following, with their performance degrading rapidly as the interaction session grows longer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T03:57:37Z)
• Embodied-BenchForge: A Closed-Loop Agentic Workflow for Embodied Benchmark Construction [18.03387691479464]
  Embodied-BenchForge is an agentic framework that transforms user-specified evaluation intents into complete embodied benchmark artifacts.<n>It formulates construction as Closed-Loop Benchmark Synthesis, integrating forward artifact with backward verification and repair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-11T17:16:01Z)
• RepoReasoner: Evaluating Repository-Level Code Reasoning Ability of Long-Context Language Models [54.53236295237077]
  We introduce RepoReasoner, a benchmark for evaluating repository-level code reasoning.<n> Output Prediction measures fine-grained, stateful execution reasoning across files.<n>Call Chain Prediction evaluates high-level architectural dependency understanding under noisy context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-28T17:12:41Z)
• Harness-Bench: Measuring Harness Effects across Models in Realistic Agent Workflows [18.6534256358905]
  We introduce Harness-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating configuration-level harness effects in realistic agent systems.<n>The benchmark contains 106 sandboxed offline tasks constructed from practical agent-use patterns.<n>Across 5,194 execution trajectories, we observe substantial variation in completion, process quality, efficiency, and failure behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T03:47:35Z)
• Coupled Hierarchical Search over Topology and Execution for Agentic Workflow Synthesis [64.2820121997882]
  We introduce HierFlow, a training-free, test-time hierarchical search architecture that automates agentic workflow design.<n> HierFlow maximizes efficiency through an intelligent gating module that selectively triggers execution-level searches based on contextual necessity.<n> Comprehensive testing across question answering, mathematical reasoning, and code generation benchmarks confirms that HierFlow consistently outperforms strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T01:56:11Z)
• ClawForge: Generating Executable Interactive Benchmarks for Command-Line Agents [59.626170560327274]
  We present textbfClawForge, a generator-backed benchmark framework for executable command-line categories under state conflict.<n>We instantiate this framework as the ClawForge-Bench (17 scenarios, 6 ability categories)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T21:34:08Z)
• Constraint Decay: The Fragility of LLM Agents in Backend Code Generation [9.659020624935687]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents demonstrate strong performance in autonomous code generation under loose specifications.<n>Production-grade software requires strict adherence to structural constraints, such as architectural patterns, databases, and object-relational mappings.<n>We present a systematic study evaluating how well agents handle structural constraints in backend generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T15:44:40Z)
• TopoPilot: Reliable Conversational Workflow Automation for Topological Data Analysis and Visualization [4.62716665682001]
  TopoPilot is a reliable and agentic framework for automating complex scientific visualization.<n>TopoPilot incorporates systematic guardrails and verification mechanisms to ensure reliable operation.<n>In evaluations, TopoPilot achieves a success rate exceeding 99%, compared to under 50% for baselines without comprehensive guardrails and checks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T05:56:53Z)
• CCTU: A Benchmark for Tool Use under Complex Constraints [66.87622847854337]
  We introduce CCTU, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) under complex constraints.<n>The benchmark comprises 200 carefully curated and challenging test cases across diverse tool-use scenarios.<n>We develop an executable constraint validation module that performs step-level validation and enforces compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T14:05:13Z)
• Do We Always Need Query-Level Workflows? Rethinking Agentic Workflow Generation for Multi-Agent Systems [72.3575737073235]
  Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) solve complex tasks by coordinating multiple agents through.<n>Existing approaches generates either at task level or query level, but their relative costs and benefits remain unclear.<n>We show that query-level workflow generation is not always necessary, since a small set of top-K best task-level together already covers equivalent or even more queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T10:05:51Z)
• Dynamic Benchmark Construction for Evaluating Large Language Models on Real-World Codes [33.80591142965565]
  We present CODE2BENCH, a pipeline for dynamically constructing robust and contamination-resistant benchmarks from real-world GitHub repositories.<n>Specifically, CODE2BENCH introduces three key innovations: (1) Automated Dynamism, achieved through periodic ingestion of recent code to minimize training data contamination; (2) Scope Graph-based dependency analysis, which enables structured classification of functions into benchmark instances with controlled dependency levels; and (3) Property-Based Testing (PBT) for the automated synthesis of rigorous test suites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T05:06:36Z)
• A Large Language Model-Empowered Agent for Reliable and Robust Structural Analysis [14.754785659805869]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities across diverse open-domain tasks, yet their application in specialized domains such as civil engineering remains largely unexplored.<n>This paper starts bridging this gap by evaluating and enhancing the reliability and robustness of LLMs in structural analysis of beams.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that the agent achieves accuracy exceeding 99.0% on the benchmark dataset, exhibiting reliable and robust performance across diverse conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T04:16:53Z)
• StructTest: Benchmarking LLMs' Reasoning through Compositional Structured Outputs [78.84060166851805]
  StructTest is a novel benchmark that evaluates large language models (LLMs) on their ability to follow compositional instructions and generate structured outputs.<n> Assessments are conducted deterministically using a rule-based evaluator, which can be easily extended to new tasks and datasets.<n>We demonstrate that StructTest remains challenging even for top-performing models like Deepseek-V3/R1 and GPT-4o.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T22:08:40Z)
• Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation [80.74757493266057]
  We introduce WorfBench, a unified workflow generation benchmark with multi-faceted scenarios and intricate graph workflow structures.<n>We also present WorfEval, a systemic evaluation protocol utilizing subsequence and subgraph matching algorithms.<n>We observe that the generated can enhance downstream tasks, enabling them to achieve superior performance with less time during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T12:41:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.