Man, Machine, and Masterpiece: Artistic Ownership in the AI Era

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15027v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:12:53 GMT
• Title: Man, Machine, and Masterpiece: Artistic Ownership in the AI Era
• Abstract summary: ArtSplit is a provotype that quantifies human and AI contributions across different stages of creative work.<n>This critique challenges the impulse to transform a historically and socially situated relation into a technical problem.
• Score: 2.3923020933411983
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The integration of AI-driven systems in creative work has sparked debates among artists and legal communities about notions of ownership. Yet there remains little consensus on how ownership should be defined and attributed when human and AI contributions are intertwined. To provoke critical reflection on these tensions, we designed ArtSplit, a provotype that explicitly quantifies human and AI contributions across different stages of creative work. Rather than aiming to resolve ownership, the provotype was used to elicit artists' responses to the idea of attributing ownership through measurable actions in the creative workflow. We argue that quantification fails to align with artists' understandings of creative intent and agency, and that efforts to measure ownership risk diluting long-standing assumptions through which artists understand and practice creative work. This critique challenges the impulse to transform a historically and socially situated relation into a technical problem.

Related papers

• Incidental Reverberations: Poetic Similarities in AI Art [0.0]
  I argue that expressive similarities in AI art are as detrimental to its cultural value as they are avoidable.<n>My critique takes the well-informed autonomy of expression and the socially responsible freedom of creative thinking to indicate some of AI art's related issues and challenges induced by its entanglements with AI science, technology, and industry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T12:19:37Z)
• ORIBA: Exploring LLM-Driven Role-Play Chatbot as a Creativity Support Tool for Original Character Artists [47.41729889651234]
  Generative AI (GAI) has raised ethical concerns in the visual artists community.<n>This paper explores how GAI can assist visual artists in developing original characters (OCs) while respecting their creative agency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T10:29:35Z)
• Aesthetic Experience and Educational Value in Co-creating Art with Generative AI: Evidence from a Survey of Young Learners [1.9863718017611578]
  This study investigates the aesthetic experience and educational value of collaborative artmaking with generative artificial intelligence (AI) among young learners and art students.<n>Based on a survey of 112 participants, we examine how human creators renegotiate their roles, how conventional notions of originality are challenged, and how aesthetic judgment is formed in human--AI co-creation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T17:55:46Z)
• The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Traditional Art Forms: A Disruption or Enhancement [0.0]
  We look at the ways that recent technologies like Geneversarative Adrial Networks and Diffusion Models are changing the fields of painting, sculpture, calligraphy, dance, music, and the arts of craft.<n>Using examples and data, we illustrate the ways that AI can democratize creative expression, improve productivity, and preserve cultural heritage.<n>We advocate for the development of ethical guidelines, collaborative approaches, and inclusive technology development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-07T16:37:04Z)
• Alien Recombination: Exploring Concept Blends Beyond Human Cognitive Availability in Visual Art [90.8684263806649]
  We show how AI can transcend human cognitive limitations in visual art creation. Our research hypothesizes that visual art contains a vast unexplored space of conceptual combinations. We present the Alien Recombination method to identify and generate concept combinations that lie beyond human cognitive availability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T11:55:38Z)
• Diffusion-Based Visual Art Creation: A Survey and New Perspectives [51.522935314070416]
  This survey explores the emerging realm of diffusion-based visual art creation, examining its development from both artistic and technical perspectives. Our findings reveal how artistic requirements are transformed into technical challenges and highlight the design and application of diffusion-based methods within visual art creation. We aim to shed light on the mechanisms through which AI systems emulate and possibly, enhance human capacities in artistic perception and creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T04:49:50Z)
• Toward an Artist-Centred AI [0.0]
  This paper contextualizes the notions of suitability and desirability of principles, practices, and tools related to the use of AI in the arts. It was composed by examining the challenges that AI poses to art production, distribution, consumption, and monetization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T09:43:23Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• Pathway to Future Symbiotic Creativity [76.20798455931603]
  We propose a classification of the creative system with a hierarchy of 5 classes, showing the pathway of creativity evolving from a mimic-human artist to a Machine artist in its own right. In art creation, it is necessary for machines to understand humans' mental states, including desires, appreciation, and emotions, humans also need to understand machines' creative capabilities and limitations. We propose a novel framework for building future Machine artists, which comes with the philosophy that a human-compatible AI system should be based on the "human-in-the-loop" principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T15:12:02Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• The Work of Art in an Age of Mechanical Generation [0.0]
  Can we define what it means to be "creative," and if so, can our definition drive artificial intelligence systems to feats of creativity indistinguishable from human efforts? This article considers the ability of AI to detect forgeries of renowned paintings and, in so doing, somehow reveal the quiddity of a work of art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T18:32:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.