Towards Responsible Multimodal Medical Reasoning via Context-Aligned Vision-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08815v1
• Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 23:09:38 GMT
• Title: Towards Responsible Multimodal Medical Reasoning via Context-Aligned Vision-Language Models
• Abstract summary: Medical vision-language models (VLMs) show strong performance on radiology tasks but often produce fluent yet weakly grounded conclusions.<n>We introduce a context-aligned reasoning framework that enforces agreement across heterogeneous clinical evidence before generating diagnostic conclusions.
• Score: 11.019570079187552
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Medical vision-language models (VLMs) show strong performance on radiology tasks but often produce fluent yet weakly grounded conclusions due to over-reliance on a dominant modality. We introduce a context-aligned reasoning framework that enforces agreement across heterogeneous clinical evidence before generating diagnostic conclusions. The proposed approach augments a frozen VLM with structured contextual signals derived from radiomic statistics, explainability activations, and vocabulary-grounded semantic cues. Instead of producing free-form responses, the model generates structured outputs containing supporting evidence, uncertainty estimates, limitations, and safety notes. We observe that auxiliary signals alone provide limited benefit; performance gains emerge only when these signals are integrated through contextual verification. Experiments on chest X-ray datasets demonstrate that context alignment improves discriminative performance (AUC 0.918 to 0.925) while maintaining calibrated uncertainty. The framework also substantially reduces hallucinated keywords (1.14 to 0.25) and produces more concise reasoning explanations (19.4 to 15.3 words) without increasing model confidence (0.70 to 0.68). Cross-dataset evaluation on CheXpert further reveals that modality informativeness significantly influences reasoning behavior. These results suggest that enforcing multi-evidence agreement improves both reliability and trustworthiness in medical multimodal reasoning, while preserving the underlying model architecture.

Related papers

• Position, Not Provenance: Separating Reasoning Mediation from Sycophancy in Medical Vision-Language Models [0.0]
  Medical vision-language models generate chain-of-thought reasoning before answering clinical questions.<n>We present CoT-Mediate, a behavioral framework that perturbs a single clinically meaningful attribute within a model's own generated reasoning.<n>We evaluate LLaVA-Med and MedGemma on 1,000 VQA-RAD samples each.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T17:11:52Z)
• Beyond the Leaderboard: Design Lessons for Trustworthy Multimodal VQA [4.080704298118247]
  multimodal AI must combine visual and textual evidence while remaining reliable and interpretable.<n>We analyze design choices across nine documented systems for question answering and explanation quality.<n>The findings support trustworthy multimodal healthcare AI based on data fusion, explainability, and resilient evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-16T17:38:19Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Depression Estimation via Disentangled Evidential Learning [50.22167852149165]
  We propose EviDep, an evidential learning framework that jointly quantifies depression severity.<n>EviDep enforces strict information integrity to guarantee robust evidence synthesis.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy and superior uncertainty calibration, delivering a robust fail-safe mechanism for trustworthy clinical screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:27:11Z)
• A Reasoning-Enabled Vision-Language Foundation Model for Chest X-ray Interpretation [48.23500302185585]
  We present CheXOne, a reasoning-enabled vision-language model for CXR interpretation.<n>CheXOne jointly generates diagnostic predictions and explicit, clinically grounded reasoning traces.<n>We show that CheXOne-drafted reports are comparable to or better than resident-written reports in 55% of cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T05:19:09Z)
• MedCausalX: Adaptive Causal Reasoning with Self-Reflection for Trustworthy Medical Vision-Language Models [10.466505116993451]
  Existing medical chain-of-thought models lack explicit mechanisms to represent and enforce causal reasoning.<n>We propose MedCausalX, an end-to-end framework explicitly models causal reasoning chains in medical VLMs.<n>We show that MedCausalX consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, improving diagnostic consistency by +5.4 points, reducing hallucination by over 10 points, and attaining top spatial grounding IoU.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T11:28:15Z)
• INFACT: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Induced Faithfulness and Factuality Hallucinations in Video-LLMs [69.11382230669491]
  hallucinations are outputs that contradict either video evidence (faithfulness) or verifiable world knowledge (factuality)<n>textscINFACT evaluates models in four modes: Base (clean), Visual Degradation, Evidence, and Temporal Intervention for order-sensitive items.<n>Experiments on 14 representative Video-LLMs reveal that higher Base-mode accuracy does not reliably translate to higher reliability in the induced modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-12T03:03:16Z)
• Suppressing Prior-Comparison Hallucinations in Radiology Report Generation via Semantically Decoupled Latent Steering [94.37535002230504]
  We develop a training-free, inference-time control framework termed Semantically Decoupled Latent Steering.<n>Our approach constructs a semantic-free intervention vector via large language model (LLM)-driven semantic decomposition.<n>We show that our approach significantly reduces the probability of historical hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T04:49:01Z)
• Strong Reasoning Isn't Enough: Evaluating Evidence Elicitation in Interactive Diagnosis [29.630872344186873]
  Interactive medical consultation requires an agent to proactively elicit missing clinical evidence under uncertainty.<n>Existing evaluations largely remain static or outcome-centric, neglecting the evidence-gathering process.<n>We propose an interactive evaluation framework that explicitly models the consultation process using a simulated patient and a revsimulated reporter grounded in atomic evidences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T16:36:35Z)
• Making medical vision-language models think causally across modalities with retrieval-augmented cross-modal reasoning [16.243806723551454]
  Medical vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance in diagnostic reporting and image-text alignment.<n>Their underlying reasoning mechanisms remain fundamentally correlational, exhibiting reliance on superficial statistical associations.<n>We propose Multimodal Causal Retrieval-Augmented Generation, a framework that integrates causal inference principles with multimodal retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T11:03:00Z)
• AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
  We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical LLMs: Benchmarking and Enhancing Confidence Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Consultation [97.36081721024728]
  We propose the first benchmark for assessing confidence in multi-turn interaction during realistic medical consultations.<n>Our benchmark unifies three types of medical data for open-ended diagnostic generation.<n>We present MedConf, an evidence-grounded linguistic self-assessment framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T04:51:39Z)
• Aligning Findings with Diagnosis: A Self-Consistent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Trustworthy Radiology Reporting [37.57009831483529]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for radiology report generation.<n>Our framework restructures generation into two distinct components: a think block for detailed findings and an answer block for structured disease labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T14:17:44Z)
• Decoupling Clinical and Class-Agnostic Features for Reliable Few-Shot Adaptation under Shift [12.373281238541296]
  Medical vision-language models (VLMs) offer promise for clinical decision support, yet their reliability under distribution shifts remains a major concern for safe deployment.<n>We propose DRiFt, a structured feature decoupling framework that explicitly separates clinically relevant signals from task-agnostic noise.<n>Our approach improves in-distribution performance by +11.4% Top-1 accuracy and +3.3% Macro-F1 over prior prompt-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T12:26:57Z)
• GEMeX-RMCoT: An Enhanced Med-VQA Dataset for Region-Aware Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [60.03671205298294]
  Medical visual question answering aims to support clinical decision-making by enabling models to answer natural language questions based on medical images.<n>Current methods still suffer from limited answer reliability and poor interpretability.<n>This work first proposes a Region-Aware Multimodal Chain-of-Thought dataset, in which the process of producing an answer is preceded by a sequence of intermediate reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T08:09:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.