Adaptive Retrieval Strategies for Biomedical Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15283v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 22:22:28 GMT
• Title: Adaptive Retrieval Strategies for Biomedical Question Answering
• Abstract summary: We propose an adaptive retrieval framework that selects retrieval and evidence aggregation strategies according to question type.<n>We evaluate the proposed framework on the BioASQ benchmark and demonstrate that adaptive retrieval strategies improve evidence relevance and answer quality.
• Score: 10.793379752589166
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Biomedical question answering (QA) encompasses diverse question types, including yes/no, factoid, list, and summary questions, each requiring distinct forms of evidence and reasoning. However, most retrieval-augmented QA systems rely on a unified retrieval pipeline, regardless of the information needs of different question categories. This one-size-fits-all approach may limit the effectiveness of evidence acquisition and downstream answer generation. In this work, we propose an adaptive retrieval framework that selects retrieval and evidence aggregation strategies according to question type. The system combines query understanding, biomedical document retrieval, reranking, knowledge graph augmentation, document clustering, and large language model-based answer generation. For yes/no questions, it focuses on precise evidence retrieval; for factoid and list questions, it emphasizes entity-oriented retrieval and clustering; and for summary questions, it performs broader evidence collection and synthesis. We evaluate the proposed framework on the BioASQ benchmark and demonstrate that adaptive retrieval strategies improve evidence relevance and answer quality across multiple question types. Our results suggest that aligning retrieval mechanisms with question-specific information needs provides an effective direction for enhancing retrieval-augmented biomedical QA systems.

Related papers

• From Voting to Agent Collaboration: Answer-Type-Aware LLM Pipelines for BioASQ 14b [12.802727947397308]
  This study presents a question-type-specific large language model (LLM) framework for BioASQ 14b Task B.<n>Rather than applying a single prompting strategy to all questions, the framework selects different inference procedures for yes/no, factoid, and list questions.<n>Preliminary experiments on BioASQ 13b were used to identify effective inference strategies for each question type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T16:12:51Z)
• MARA: A Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Document Question Answering [51.19392014547221]
  Retrieval-based multimodal document QA aims to identify and integrate relevant information from visually rich documents with complex multimodal structures.<n>Current approaches rely on query-agnostic document representations that overlook salient content.<n>We propose the Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented (MARA) framework, which introduces query-adaptive generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T12:27:40Z)
• UETQuintet at BioCreative IX - MedHopQA: Enhancing Biomedical QA with Selective Multi-hop Reasoning and Contextual Retrieval [0.0]
  We propose a model designed to effectively address both direct and sequential questions.<n>We leverage multi-source information retrieval and in-context learning to provide rich, relevant context for generating answers.<n>Our approach achieves an Exact Match score of 0.84, ranking second on the current leaderboard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T16:12:38Z)
• Pointwise Mutual Information as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [78.28197013467157]
  We show that the pointwise mutual information between a context and a question is an effective gauge for language model performance.<n>We propose two methods that use the pointwise mutual information between a document and a question as a gauge for selecting and constructing prompts that lead to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:14:09Z)
• ELOQ: Resources for Enhancing LLM Detection of Out-of-Scope Questions [52.33835101586687]
  We study out-of-scope questions, where the retrieved document appears semantically similar to the question but lacks the necessary information to answer it.<n>We propose a guided hallucination-based approach ELOQ to automatically generate a diverse set of out-of-scope questions from post-cutoff documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T16:11:29Z)
• Aspect-oriented Consumer Health Answer Summarization [2.298110639419913]
  Community Question-Answering (CQA) forums have revolutionized how people seek information, especially those related to their healthcare needs. There can be several answers in response to a single query, which makes it hard to grasp the key information related to the specific health concern. Our research focuses on aspect-based summarization of health answers to address this limitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T07:52:43Z)
• CLARINET: Augmenting Language Models to Ask Clarification Questions for Retrieval [52.134133938779776]
  We present CLARINET, a system that asks informative clarification questions by choosing questions whose answers would maximize certainty in the correct candidate. Our approach works by augmenting a large language model (LLM) to condition on a retrieval distribution, finetuning end-to-end to generate the question that would have maximized the rank of the true candidate at each turn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T18:21:31Z)
• Contributions to the Improvement of Question Answering Systems in the Biomedical Domain [0.951828574518325]
  This thesis work falls within the framework of question answering (QA) in the biomedical domain. We propose four contributions to improve the performance of QA in the biomedical domain. We develop a fully automated semantic biomedical QA system called SemBioNLQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T16:31:20Z)
• Adaptive Information Seeking for Open-Domain Question Answering [61.39330982757494]
  We propose a novel adaptive information-seeking strategy for open-domain question answering, namely AISO. According to the learned policy, AISO could adaptively select a proper retrieval action to seek the missing evidence at each step. AISO outperforms all baseline methods with predefined strategies in terms of both retrieval and answer evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-14T15:08:13Z)
• Reinforcement Learning for Abstractive Question Summarization with Question-aware Semantic Rewards [20.342580435464072]
  We introduce a reinforcement learning-based framework for abstractive question summarization. We propose two novel rewards obtained from the downstream tasks of (i) question-type identification and (ii) question-focus recognition. These rewards ensure the generation of semantically valid questions and encourage the inclusion of key medical entities/foci in the question summary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T02:06:46Z)
• Interpretable Multi-Step Reasoning with Knowledge Extraction on Complex Healthcare Question Answering [89.76059961309453]
  HeadQA dataset contains multiple-choice questions authorized for the public healthcare specialization exam. These questions are the most challenging for current QA systems. We present a Multi-step reasoning with Knowledge extraction framework (MurKe) We are striving to make full use of off-the-shelf pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-06T02:47:46Z)
• CAiRE-COVID: A Question Answering and Query-focused Multi-Document Summarization System for COVID-19 Scholarly Information Management [48.251211691263514]
  We present CAiRE-COVID, a real-time question answering (QA) and multi-document summarization system, which won one of the 10 tasks in the Kaggle COVID-19 Open Research dataset Challenge. Our system aims to tackle the recent challenge of mining the numerous scientific articles being published on COVID-19 by answering high priority questions from the community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T15:07:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.