CAiRE-COVID: A Question Answering and Query-focused Multi-Document Summarization System for COVID-19 Scholarly Information Management

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.03975v3
• Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 11:30:49 GMT
• Title: CAiRE-COVID: A Question Answering and Query-focused Multi-Document Summarization System for COVID-19 Scholarly Information Management
• Authors: Dan Su, Yan Xu, Tiezheng Yu, Farhad Bin Siddique, Elham J. Barezi, Pascale Fung
• Abstract summary: We present CAiRE-COVID, a real-time question answering (QA) and multi-document summarization system, which won one of the 10 tasks in the Kaggle COVID-19 Open Research dataset Challenge. Our system aims to tackle the recent challenge of mining the numerous scientific articles being published on COVID-19 by answering high priority questions from the community.
• Score: 48.251211691263514
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present CAiRE-COVID, a real-time question answering (QA) and multi-document summarization system, which won one of the 10 tasks in the Kaggle COVID-19 Open Research Dataset Challenge, judged by medical experts. Our system aims to tackle the recent challenge of mining the numerous scientific articles being published on COVID-19 by answering high priority questions from the community and summarizing salient question-related information. It combines information extraction with state-of-the-art QA and query-focused multi-document summarization techniques, selecting and highlighting evidence snippets from existing literature given a query. We also propose query-focused abstractive and extractive multi-document summarization methods, to provide more relevant information related to the question. We further conduct quantitative experiments that show consistent improvements on various metrics for each module. We have launched our website CAiRE-COVID for broader use by the medical community, and have open-sourced the code for our system, to bootstrap further study by other researches.

Related papers

• SciDQA: A Deep Reading Comprehension Dataset over Scientific Papers [20.273439120429025]
  SciDQA is a new dataset for reading comprehension that challenges LLMs for a deep understanding of scientific articles. Unlike other scientific QA datasets, SciDQA sources questions from peer reviews by domain experts and answers by paper authors. Questions in SciDQA necessitate reasoning across figures, tables, equations, appendices, and supplementary materials.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T05:28:22Z)
• SPIQA: A Dataset for Multimodal Question Answering on Scientific Papers [43.18330795060871]
  SPIQA is a dataset specifically designed to interpret complex figures and tables within the context of scientific research articles. We employ automatic and manual curation to create the dataset. SPIQA comprises 270K questions divided into training, validation, and three different evaluation splits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T16:37:59Z)
• Improving Health Question Answering with Reliable and Time-Aware Evidence Retrieval [5.69361786082969]
  Our study focuses on the open-domain QA setting, where the key challenge is to first uncover relevant evidence in large knowledge bases. By utilizing the common retrieve-then-read QA pipeline and PubMed as a trustworthy collection of medical research documents, we answer health questions from three diverse datasets. Our results reveal that cutting down on the amount of retrieved documents and favoring more recent and highly cited documents can improve the final macro F1 score up to 10%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-12T09:56:12Z)
• Clinfo.ai: An Open-Source Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model System for Answering Medical Questions using Scientific Literature [44.715854387549605]
  We release Clinfo.ai, an open-source WebApp that answers clinical questions based on dynamically retrieved scientific literature. We report benchmark results for Clinfo.ai and other publicly available OpenQA systems on PubMedRS-200.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T19:43:39Z)
• Embrace Divergence for Richer Insights: A Multi-document Summarization Benchmark and a Case Study on Summarizing Diverse Information from News Articles [136.84278943588652]
  We propose a new task of summarizing diverse information encountered in multiple news articles encompassing the same event. To facilitate this task, we outlined a data collection schema for identifying diverse information and curated a dataset named DiverseSumm. The dataset includes 245 news stories, with each story comprising 10 news articles and paired with a human-validated reference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-17T20:28:17Z)
• Enhancing Human-like Multi-Modal Reasoning: A New Challenging Dataset and Comprehensive Framework [51.44863255495668]
  Multimodal reasoning is a critical component in the pursuit of artificial intelligence systems that exhibit human-like intelligence. We present Multi-Modal Reasoning(COCO-MMR) dataset, a novel dataset that encompasses an extensive collection of open-ended questions. We propose innovative techniques, including multi-hop cross-modal attention and sentence-level contrastive learning, to enhance the image and text encoders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T08:58:25Z)
• QuOTeS: Query-Oriented Technical Summarization [0.2936007114555107]
  We propose QuOTeS, an interactive system designed to retrieve sentences related to a summary of the research from a collection of potential references. QuOTeS integrates techniques from Query-Focused Extractive Summarization and High-Recall Information Retrieval to provide Interactive Query-Focused Summarization of scientific documents. The results show that QuOTeS provides a positive user experience and consistently provides query-focused summaries that are relevant, concise, and complete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T18:43:24Z)
• MQAG: Multiple-choice Question Answering and Generation for Assessing Information Consistency in Summarization [55.60306377044225]
  State-of-the-art summarization systems can generate highly fluent summaries. These summaries, however, may contain factual inconsistencies and/or information not present in the source. We introduce an alternative scheme based on standard information-theoretic measures in which the information present in the source and summary is directly compared.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T23:08:25Z)
• A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Papers [66.11048565324468]
  We present a dataset of 5,049 questions over 1,585 Natural Language Processing papers. Each question is written by an NLP practitioner who read only the title and abstract of the corresponding paper, and the question seeks information present in the full text. We find that existing models that do well on other QA tasks do not perform well on answering these questions, underperforming humans by at least 27 F1 points when answering them from entire papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T00:12:34Z)
• Interpretable Multi-Step Reasoning with Knowledge Extraction on Complex Healthcare Question Answering [89.76059961309453]
  HeadQA dataset contains multiple-choice questions authorized for the public healthcare specialization exam. These questions are the most challenging for current QA systems. We present a Multi-step reasoning with Knowledge extraction framework (MurKe) We are striving to make full use of off-the-shelf pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-06T02:47:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.