Fast and Scalable Caputo Fractional Gradient Descent via Perturbation-Preserving Memory Compression
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15505v1
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 23:27:12 GMT
- Title: Fast and Scalable Caputo Fractional Gradient Descent via Perturbation-Preserving Memory Compression
- Abstract summary: Fractional gradient descent (FGD) incorporates long-range memory through Caputo-type operators.<n>We make Caputo-based computationally viable without sacrificing intrinsic memory.<n>We analyze how the compressed memory affects the optimization dynamics.
- Score: 8.700868089354536
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Fractional gradient descent (FGD) incorporates long-range memory through Caputo-type operators and has been shown to improve stability in ill-conditioned and nonconvex optimization problems. Despite these advantages, its practical use remains limited, mainly due to the high computational cost of evaluating history-dependent convolutions, which scales quadratically with the number of iterations. In this paper, we focus on making Caputo-based optimization computationally viable without sacrificing its intrinsic memory structure. We begin by expressing the fractional descent direction as a discrete convolution over past gradients, which provides a unified view of the method. Based on this formulation, we introduce two complementary mechanisms to reduce the cost of the memory term. The first uses a sum-of-exponentials (SOE) approximation of the power-law kernel, leading to efficient recursive updates. The second approach, newly proposed in this paper as dyadic hierarchical discrete convolution (DHDC), compresses the gradient history through a multiscale aggregation strategy. Rather than treating these approximations as purely numerical accelerations, we interpret them as perturbations of the ideal Caputo operator. This viewpoint allows us to analyze how the compressed memory affects the optimization dynamics. Under standard $μ$-strong convexity and $L$-smoothness assumptions, we show that the resulting method still exhibits monotone descent and linear convergence, provided that the approximation error remains controlled.
Related papers
- Closed-Form Last Layer Optimization [72.49151473937319]
Under a squared loss, the optimal solution to the linear last layer weights is known in closed-form.<n>We show this is equivalent to alternating between gradient descent steps on the backbone and closed-form updates on the last layer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T09:14:39Z) - More Optimal Fractional-Order Stochastic Gradient Descent for Non-Convex Optimization Problems [2.5971517743176915]
We propose 2SED Fractional-Order Gradient Descent (2FOSGD), which integrates the Two-Scale Effective Dimension (2SED) with FOSGD.<n>By tracking sensitivity and effective dimensionality, 2SEDFOSGD dynamically modulates the exponent to mitigate sluggish oscillations and hasten convergence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-05T19:27:36Z) - Effective Dimension Aware Fractional-Order Stochastic Gradient Descent for Convex Optimization Problems [2.5971517743176915]
We propose 2SED Fractional-Order Gradient Descent (2SEDFOSGD) to adapt the fractional exponent in a data-driven manner.<n>Theoretically, this approach preserves the advantages of fractional memory without the sluggish or unstable behavior observed in na"ive fractional SGD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-17T22:57:37Z) - Memory-Efficient 4-bit Preconditioned Stochastic Optimization [53.422307389223626]
We introduce 4-bit quantization for Shampoo's preconditioners.<n>To our knowledge, this is the first quantization approach applied to Cholesky factors of preconditioners.<n>We demonstrate that combining Cholesky quantization with error feedback enhances memory efficiency and algorithm performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-14T03:32:54Z) - Stochastic Gradient Descent for Gaussian Processes Done Right [86.83678041846971]
We show that when emphdone right -- by which we mean using specific insights from optimisation and kernel communities -- gradient descent is highly effective.
We introduce a emphstochastic dual descent algorithm, explain its design in an intuitive manner and illustrate the design choices.
Our method places Gaussian process regression on par with state-of-the-art graph neural networks for molecular binding affinity prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-31T16:15:13Z) - Stable Nonconvex-Nonconcave Training via Linear Interpolation [51.668052890249726]
This paper presents a theoretical analysis of linearahead as a principled method for stabilizing (large-scale) neural network training.
We argue that instabilities in the optimization process are often caused by the nonmonotonicity of the loss landscape and show how linear can help by leveraging the theory of nonexpansive operators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T12:45:12Z) - Robust Stochastic Optimization via Gradient Quantile Clipping [6.2844649973308835]
We introduce a quant clipping strategy for Gradient Descent (SGD)
We use gradient new outliers as norm clipping chains.
We propose an implementation of the algorithm using Huberiles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-29T15:24:48Z) - Sampling from Gaussian Process Posteriors using Stochastic Gradient
Descent [43.097493761380186]
gradient algorithms are an efficient method of approximately solving linear systems.
We show that gradient descent produces accurate predictions, even in cases where it does not converge quickly to the optimum.
Experimentally, gradient descent achieves state-of-the-art performance on sufficiently large-scale or ill-conditioned regression tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-20T15:07:37Z) - Gradient is All You Need? [0.0]
In this paper we provide a novel analytical perspective on the theoretical understanding of learning algorithms by interpreting consensus-based gradient-based optimization (CBO)
Our results prove the intrinsic power of CBO to alleviate the complexities of the nonlocal landscape function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-16T11:30:55Z) - Stochastic Marginal Likelihood Gradients using Neural Tangent Kernels [78.6096486885658]
We introduce lower bounds to the linearized Laplace approximation of the marginal likelihood.
These bounds are amenable togradient-based optimization and allow to trade off estimation accuracy against computational complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-06T19:02:57Z) - COCO Denoiser: Using Co-Coercivity for Variance Reduction in Stochastic
Convex Optimization [4.970364068620608]
We exploit convexity and L-smoothness to improve the noisy estimates outputted by the gradient oracle.
We show that increasing the number and proximity of the queried points leads to better gradient estimates.
We also apply COCO in vanilla settings by plugging it in existing algorithms, such as SGD, Adam or STRSAGA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-07T17:21:09Z) - Zeroth-Order Hybrid Gradient Descent: Towards A Principled Black-Box
Optimization Framework [100.36569795440889]
This work is on the iteration of zero-th-order (ZO) optimization which does not require first-order information.
We show that with a graceful design in coordinate importance sampling, the proposed ZO optimization method is efficient both in terms of complexity as well as as function query cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-21T17:29:58Z) - Cogradient Descent for Bilinear Optimization [124.45816011848096]
We introduce a Cogradient Descent algorithm (CoGD) to address the bilinear problem.
We solve one variable by considering its coupling relationship with the other, leading to a synchronous gradient descent.
Our algorithm is applied to solve problems with one variable under the sparsity constraint.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-16T13:41:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.