To Police or to Guide: How Higher Education Computer Science Instructors Design and Implement Generative AI Policies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16475v2
• Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 02:04:26 GMT
• Title: To Police or to Guide: How Higher Education Computer Science Instructors Design and Implement Generative AI Policies
• Abstract summary: This study investigates how instructors think about their roles and responsibilities to students through their course AI policies.<n>We found that while instructors recognize that AI tools could harm student learning, AI policies primarily seek to AI-proof assessments.<n>Although policies such as switching to paper exams can preserve assessment integrity in the short term, instructors report extra burden of policing student AI use behaviors.
• Score: 1.1666234644810893
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While generative AI tools are directly changing how undergraduate computer science is learned and taught, they are also reshaping the relationships between instructors and students. In contrast to existing tool-oriented research on how instructors view and adopt AI, this study investigates how instructors think about their roles and responsibilities to students through their course AI policies. Based on 13 semi-structured interviews with CS instructors in the US, we found that while instructors recognize that AI tools could harm student learning, AI policies primarily seek to AI-proof assessments without directly addressing student learning. Although policies such as switching to paper exams can preserve assessment integrity in the short term, instructors report extra burden of policing student AI use behaviors and worsening relationships with students. Based on the experiences of several interviewees, we make recommendations on AI policies that are more learning-oriented and could guide students toward healthier AI usage instead.

Related papers

• Beyond Detection: Redesigning Assessment and Governande of Generative AI at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) [39.92037610044293]
  Most institutions frame the debate around AI detection, plagiarism, academic integrity and a presumed drop in student effort as defensive.<n>Other group of pioneering universities is pursuing deeper adoption, and assuming that any policy built on prevention or sanction will not hold.<n>What universities need instead is a coordinated effort to set clear, course-by-course rules for GenAI use.<n>UPM is developing a strategic and sustainable AI policy and adoption framework structured around six dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T18:04:50Z)
• "Everyone's using it, but no one is allowed to talk about it": College Students' Experiences Navigating the Higher Education Environment in a Generative AI World [13.109430455513882]
  Findings show that institutional pressure factors like deadlines, exam cycles, and grading lead students to engage with AI even when they think it undermines their learning.<n>Current institutional AI policies are perceived as generic, inconsistent, and confusing, resulting in routine noncompliance.<n>Students develop value-based self-regulation strategies, but environmental pressures create a gap between students' intentions and their behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-17T19:00:28Z)
• AI in Education: Rationale, Principles, and Instructional Implications [0.0]
  Generative AI, like ChatGPT, can create human-like content, prompting questions about its educational role.<n>The study emphasizes deliberate strategies to ensure AI complements, not replaces, genuine cognitive effort.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T14:08:07Z)
• Navigating the Future of Education: Educators' Insights on AI Integration and Challenges in Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Ireland and Armenia [1.7205106391379026]
  This paper aims to explore how teachers currently use AI and how it can enhance the educational process. We conducted a cross-national study spanning Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Ireland, and Armenia, surveying 1754 educators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T10:22:05Z)
• A Multi-Year Grey Literature Review on AI-assisted Test Automation [46.97326049485643]
  Test Automation (TA) techniques are crucial for quality assurance in software engineering but face limitations.<n>Given the prevalent usage of AI in industry, sources of truth are held in grey literature as well as the minds of professionals.<n>This study surveys grey literature to explore how AI is adopted in TA, focusing on the problems it solves, its solutions, and the available tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-12T15:26:36Z)
• The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants [53.89899371095332]
  This paper focuses on the opportunities and the ethical and societal risks posed by advanced AI assistants. We define advanced AI assistants as artificial agents with natural language interfaces, whose function is to plan and execute sequences of actions on behalf of a user. We consider the deployment of advanced assistants at a societal scale, focusing on cooperation, equity and access, misinformation, economic impact, the environment and how best to evaluate advanced AI assistants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T23:18:46Z)
• Charting the Future of AI in Project-Based Learning: A Co-Design Exploration with Students [35.05435052195561]
  The increasing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by students in learning presents new challenges for assessing their learning outcomes. This paper introduces a co-design study to explore the potential of students' AI usage data as a novel material for assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T14:49:29Z)
• Understanding Teacher Perspectives and Experiences after Deployment of AI Literacy Curriculum in Middle-school Classrooms [12.35885897302579]
  We investigate the experiences of seven teachers following their implementation of modules from the MIT RAICA curriculum. Our analysis suggests that the AI modules expanded our teachers' knowledge in the field. Our teachers advocated their need for better external support when navigating technological resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T05:36:16Z)
• Social Contract AI: Aligning AI Assistants with Implicit Group Norms [37.68821926786935]
  We explore the idea of aligning an AI assistant by inverting a model of users' (unknown) preferences from observed interactions. We run proof-of-concept simulations in the economic ultimatum game, formalizing user preferences as policies that guide the actions of simulated players.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T20:27:03Z)
• Assigning AI: Seven Approaches for Students, with Prompts [0.0]
  This paper examines the transformative role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in education and their potential as learning tools. The authors propose seven approaches for utilizing AI in classrooms: AI-tutor, AI-coach, AI-mentor, AI-teammate, AI-tool, AI-simulator, and AI-student.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:36:36Z)
• An Experience Report of Executive-Level Artificial Intelligence Education in the United Arab Emirates [53.04281982845422]
  We present an experience report of teaching an AI course to business executives in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Rather than focusing only on theoretical and technical aspects, we developed a course that teaches AI with a view to enabling students to understand how to incorporate it into existing business processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T20:59:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.