Optimizing Clinical Trial Protocols Using EHR-Derived Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16934v1
- Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:06:47 GMT
- Title: Optimizing Clinical Trial Protocols Using EHR-Derived Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
- Abstract summary: We emulate the DAPA-HF trial using electronic health records from the Mayo Clinic Cloud.<n>In this study, we investigate whether HTE-guided stratification can identify patient subgroups with distinct treatment responses to dapagliflozin.
- Score: 6.268930167932179
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Traditional randomized trials often obscure clinically meaningful heterogeneity in treatment response by focusing on average effects. Leveraging real-world data to emulate clinical trials and estimate heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) offers a promising path toward more precise and efficient trial design. In this study, we emulate the DAPA-HF trial using electronic health records from the Mayo Clinic Cloud (MCC) to investigate whether HTE-guided stratification can identify patient subgroups with distinct treatment responses to dapagliflozin versus placebo in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. All-cause mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models, with HTEs estimated using a Meta-S learner and subgroups defined using a decision tree-based thresholding approach. In the overall cohort of the emulation, no significant treatment difference was observed (HR, 1.681; 95% CI, 0.828-3.413; p = 0.1507). However, compared with the overall emulated cohort, in which dapagliflozin showed no statistically significant survival benefit, HTE-driven stratification identified subgroups with significant and directionally distinct treatment effects. The beneficial (low-HTE) subgroup showed a significant survival benefit from dapagliflozin (HR = 0.203, 95% CI, 0.087-0.476, p = 0.0002), whereas the harmful (high-HTE) subgroup showed a significant harmful association with markedly increased mortality risk (HR = 6.680, 95% CI, 2.759-16.171, p < 0.0001). These findings indicate that HTE-guided stratification can uncover clinically meaningful beneficial and harmful treatment-effect patterns that are masked in the full-cohort emulation.
Related papers
- Dialysis Risk Prediction and Treatment Effect Estimation for AKI patients using Longitudinal Electronic Health Records [5.2513348694877156]
We constructed a fixed-window EHR cohort and modeled sequences of diagnoses, procedures, and medications with kidney laboratory trends.<n>A transformer-based causal multi-head model was trained to estimate drug- and ingredient-level average treatment effects.<n>Results showed partial protective-direction support for ACE/ARB exposures and worsening-direction signals for loop diuretics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-27T14:41:37Z) - LLM-Extracted Covariates for Clinical Causal Inference: Rethinking Integration Strategies [7.5675661390024125]
Causal inference from electronic health records is fundamentally limited by unmeasured confounding.<n>We show how to effectively integrate latent confounders into causal estimation pipelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-18T00:26:10Z) - Association of Progressive PPFE and Mortality in Lung Cancer Screening Cohorts [5.971403380829146]
Pleuroparenchymalfibroelastosis (PPFE) is an upper predominantfibrotic lung abnormality.<n>The clinical significance of PPFE progression in lung cancer screening populations remains unclear.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-10T11:37:50Z) - Utilizing the RAIN method and Graph SAGE Model to Identify Effective Drug Combinations for Gastric Neoplasm Treatment [0.0]
The RAIN method integrated Graph SAGE to propose drug combinations.<n>It validated proposed drugs, followed by network meta-analysis to assess efficacy, implemented in Python.<n>Fluorouracil alone had a p-value of 0.0229, improving to 0.0099 with trastuzumab, and 0.0069 for the triple combination, indicating superior efficacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-16T10:19:19Z) - Comprehensive Methodology for Sample Augmentation in EEG Biomarker Studies for Alzheimers Risk Classification [0.0]
Alzheimer's disease (AD), the leading type, accounts for 70% of cases.<n>EEG measures show promise in identifying AD risk, but obtaining large samples for reliable comparisons is challenging.<n>This study integrates signal processing, harmonization, and statistical techniques to enhance sample size and improve AD risk classification reliability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-20T10:31:02Z) - CIMIL-CRC: a clinically-informed multiple instance learning framework for patient-level colorectal cancer molecular subtypes classification from H\&E stained images [42.771819949806655]
We introduce CIMIL-CRC', a framework that solves the MSI/MSS MIL problem by efficiently combining a pre-trained feature extraction model with principal component analysis (PCA) to aggregate information from all patches.
We assessed our CIMIL-CRC method using the average area under the curve (AUC) from a 5-fold cross-validation experimental setup for model development on the TCGA-CRC-DX cohort.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T12:56:11Z) - A new algorithm for Subgroup Set Discovery based on Information Gain [58.720142291102135]
Information Gained Subgroup Discovery (IGSD) is a new SD algorithm for pattern discovery.
We compare IGSD with two state-of-the-art SD algorithms: FSSD and SSD++.
IGSD provides better OR values than FSSD and SSD++, stating a higher dependence between patterns and targets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-26T21:42:34Z) - Augmented Learning of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects via Gradient
Boosting Trees [0.2320417845168326]
We propose a two-stage statistical learning procedure for estimating Heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE)
The first stage is to estimate the main-effect equivalency of the baseline markers on the outcome, which is then used as an augmentation term in the second stage estimation for HTE.
A permutation test is proposed for global assessment of evidence for HTE.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-02T19:10:04Z) - Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference [58.442274475425144]
Since the average treatment effect measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population.
In this paper we consider how to nonetheless assess this important risk measure, formalized as the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the ITE distribution.
Some bounds can also be interpreted as summarizing a complex CATE function into a single metric and are of interest independently of being a bound.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-15T17:21:26Z) - Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With
Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model.
We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data.
Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z) - A standardized framework for risk-based assessment of treatment effect
heterogeneity in observational healthcare databases [60.07352590494571]
The aim of this study was to extend this approach to the observational setting using a standardized scalable framework.
We demonstrate our framework by evaluating the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus beta blockers on three efficacy and six safety outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-13T14:48:31Z) - Robust Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with
Uncertainty Quantification [84.53697297858146]
Subgroup analysis of treatment effects plays an important role in applications from medicine to public policy to recommender systems.
Most of the current methods of subgroup analysis begin with a particular algorithm for estimating individualized treatment effects (ITE)
This paper develops a new method for subgroup analysis, R2P, that addresses all these weaknesses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-14T14:50:02Z) - Learning for Dose Allocation in Adaptive Clinical Trials with Safety
Constraints [84.09488581365484]
Phase I dose-finding trials are increasingly challenging as the relationship between efficacy and toxicity of new compounds becomes more complex.
Most commonly used methods in practice focus on identifying a Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) by learning only from toxicity events.
We present a novel adaptive clinical trial methodology that aims at maximizing the cumulative efficacies while satisfying the toxicity safety constraint with high probability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-09T03:06:45Z) - Large-Scale Screening of COVID-19 from Community Acquired Pneumonia
using Infection Size-Aware Classification [41.85283468679224]
A total of 1658 patients with COVID-19 and 1027 patients of CAP underwent thin-section CT.
All images were preprocessed to obtain the segmentations of both infections and lung fields.
An infection Size Aware Random Forest method (iSARF) was proposed, in which subjects were automated categorized into groups with different ranges of infected lesion sizes.
Experimental results show that the proposed method yielded sensitivity of 0.907, specificity of 0.833, and accuracy of 0.879 under five-fold cross-validation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-22T11:12:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.