How the Quantum Sorites Phenomenon Strengthens the Bell Argument and How a Random-Matrix Collapse Dynamics Answers It

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17894v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:43:08 GMT
• Title: How the Quantum Sorites Phenomenon Strengthens the Bell Argument and How a Random-Matrix Collapse Dynamics Answers It
• Abstract summary: Bell proved that no theory of pre-existing local values can reproduce predictions of quantum mechanics.<n>Most commentators have found Outcome Independence the safer sacrifice.<n>In the random-matrix collapse dynamics proposed by Kryukov, measurement is a random walk of the quantum state.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Bell proved that no theory of pre-existing local values can reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics, but his proof leaves the culprit ambiguous: one may reject either of two independence conditions, Outcome Independence or Parameter Independence, and most commentators have found Outcome Independence the safer sacrifice. The first part of this paper presents, in a form adapted to spin-1/2 particles in the singlet state, an argument (Forster 2014) that removes the ambiguity: using a chained family of experiments in which quantum mechanics predicts an extreme pattern of correlations -- the quantum Sorites phenomenon -- a contradiction is derived without ever assuming Outcome Independence. Under the resulting theorem, anyone who holds that hidden variables could improve on the quantum probabilities must give up Parameter Independence itself. That looks like a heavy price, because Parameter Independence appears to be protected twice over: rejecting it seems to put superluminal influences into spacetime, and its statistical shadow -- the No-Signaling condition -- is experimentally beyond reproach The second part of the paper shows that the price is payable. In the random-matrix collapse dynamics proposed by Kryukov, measurement is a random walk of the quantum state, and the hidden variable is not a stock of values fixed at the source but the random stream that drives the walk -- like the stored random numbers of a computer simulation, with the measurement settings playing the role of seeds. In that framework Parameter Independence is false while Outcome Independence and No-Signaling are both true, and one can say exactly how the Sorites argument is blocked, why the violation involves no process propagating in spacetime, and why the influence of one wing's setting on the other wing's outcome -- demonstrated here in a simulation -- can never be used to send a message.

Related papers

• Quantum nonlocality: no, yes, how and why [51.85131234265026]
  L.Sica has demonstrated that, in order to violate Bell's inequalities, the series recorded at (say) Bob can be different from the series recorded at Bob if that setting had been alfa'instead.<n>It cannot be experimentally verified because of its counterfactual nature, but is observed in computer simulations.<n>An appropriate computer code is based on the simple model mentioned plus a contextual instruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T22:34:33Z)
• Quantum-Like Correlations from Local Hidden-Variable Theories Under Conservation Law [45.88028371034407]
  We show how to construct a local hidden-variable model that violates Bell inequalities.<n>The model also gives subtly different predictions to quantum mechanics, that could be tested experimentally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T15:32:13Z)
• Time Symmetry, Retrocausality, and Emergent Collapse: The Tlalpan Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics [51.56484100374058]
  The Tlalpan Interpretation (QTI) proposes that the wavefunction collapse is not a primitive, axiomatic rule but an emergent phenomenon.<n>The novelty of QTI lies in its embedding of collapse within the conceptual language of critical phenomena in statistical physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T20:30:56Z)
• A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
  We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
• Some consequences of Sica's approach to Bell's inequalities [55.2480439325792]
  Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that the time series of outcomes observed in one station does not change if the setting in the other station is changed. In this paper, Sica's approach is extended to series with non ideal efficiency and to the actual time structure of experimental data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T13:59:52Z)
• Quantum Nonlocality: how does Nature do it? [0.0]
  This paper advocates the importance of contextuality, Einstein causality and global symmetries. The violation of Bell inequalities in physics and in cognitive science can be explained using the notion of Bohr contextuality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T16:16:10Z)
• Quantum nonlocality: How does nature do it? [0.0]
  Hance and Hossenfelder argue that maintaining local causality requires violating statistical independence. Here, we recall that there is a third option, namely, rejecting that measurement outcomes are governed in any way by hidden variables. We argue that this third option is scientifically more plausible and answers the question of why and how nature produces quantum nonlocality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T20:32:42Z)
• Certified Quantumness via Single-Shot Temporal Measurements [0.0]
  Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem states that a non-contextual hidden- variable theory cannot reproduce predictions of quantum mechanics.<n>Asher Peres gave a simple proof of quantum contextuality in a four-dimensional Hilbert space of two spin-1/2 particles.<n>We present a similar proof in time with a temporal version of the Peres-like argument.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T12:42:32Z)
• Contextuality or nonlocality; what would John Bell choose today? [0.0]
  A violation of Bell-CHSH inequalities does not justify speculations about quantum non-locality. For us, a violation of Bell-CHSH inequalities proves only that hidden variables have to depend on settings confirming contextual character of quantum observables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-19T16:50:07Z)
• Indeterminism and Undecidability [0.0]
  Chaitin's follow-up to Goedel's (first) incompleteness theorem can be proved. The main point is that Bell and others did not exploit the full empirical content of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-07T11:06:23Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
• Using Randomness to decide among Locality, Realism and Ergodicity [91.3755431537592]
  An experiment is proposed to find out, or at least to get an indication about, which one is false. The results of such experiment would be important not only to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-06T19:26:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.