A Systematic Benchmark of Intensity Normalisation Methods for 3D Knee MRI Segmentation and Cross-Domain Generalisability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20028v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:14:45 GMT
• Title: A Systematic Benchmark of Intensity Normalisation Methods for 3D Knee MRI Segmentation and Cross-Domain Generalisability
• Abstract summary: An important but underexplored factor affecting model generalisability is intensity normalisation.<n>We compared seven normalisation methods and their impact on the performance of a 3D U-Net model for meniscus segmentation from knee MRI.<n>While intensity normalisation had a measurable effect on model generalisability, its impact was limited relative to the effects of domain shift.
• Score: 0.28675177318965045
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Robust out-of-the-box performance is essential for the clinical deployment of deep learning models in medical imaging. An important but underexplored factor affecting model generalisability is intensity normalisation, particularly for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), where image intensities vary across scanners and protocols. In this study, we systematically compared seven normalisation methods and their impact on the performance of a 3D U-Net model for meniscus segmentation from knee MRI. The methods included standard scaling approaches, histogram-based techniques, and a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM)-based method. Models were trained on the IWOAI 2019 dataset and evaluated on both internal and external test sets (SKM-TEA) to assess generalisability. Performance was similar internally but differences were significant on external data, with Z-score, Nyúl histogram matching, and CLAHE showing greater robustness than other methods. However, these differences were small compared to the significant performance drop observed between datasets. Overall, while intensity normalisation had a measurable effect on model generalisability, its impact was limited relative to the effects of domain shift, highlighting the need for complementary strategies for robust deployment.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Intra-Patient 3D Deformable Multimodal Image Registration [4.37027575905308]
  We present a benchmark of intra-patient 3D multimodal deformable registration methods across three datasets.<n>We evaluate classical optimization-based approaches and modern learning-based methods, including recent deep learning and foundation models.<n>Results show high variability across datasets, with learning-based methods demonstrating superior performance on large synthetic benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T14:47:57Z)
• On the Role of MRI Sequences in Cross-Dataset Generalization for Brain Tumor Segmentation [0.6303112417588329]
  This study systematically evaluates how individual MRI sequences influence model robustness across two well-known datasets.<n>A ResUNet-based framework is employed, where each modality is trained independently to isolate its effect.<n>Results show that the T2f/FLAIR sequence achieves the best cross-dataset performance, with Dice scores exceeding 75%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-30T18:17:18Z)
• D3Seg: Dependency-Aware Diffusion for Brain Tumor Segmentation with Missing Modalities [54.87947751720332]
  We propose a novel segmentation model D3Seg to maintain stable performance under missing-modality settings.<n>The proposed model achieves approximately 1.5-2.0% Dice improvement on enhancing tumor (ET) and around 1.0% on tumor core (TC) across multiple missing modality configurations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T09:55:42Z)
• A Systematic Evaluation of Imbalance Handling Methods in Biomedical Binary Classification [9.011003401201323]
  This study systematically examined the impact of imbalance handling methods (IHMs) on predictive performance in biomedical binary classification.<n>We evaluated five representative IHMs: random undersampling (RUS), random oversampling (ROS), SMOTE, re-weighting (RW), and direct F1-score optimization (DMO)<n>Clear benefits were observed for more complex models and unstructured data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T21:57:38Z)
• One Sequence to Segment Them All: Efficient Data Augmentation for CT and MRI Cross-Domain 3D Spine Segmentation [14.430939194449229]
  Deep learning-based medical image segmentation is increasingly used to support clinical diagnosis and develop new treatment strategies.<n>However, model performance remains limited by the scarcity of high-quality annotated data and insufficient generalization across imaging protocols.<n>This limitation is particularly evident in MRI and CT, where models are typically trained on a single acquisition sequence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T19:26:29Z)
• Adapting HFMCA to Graph Data: Self-Supervised Learning for Generalizable fMRI Representations [57.054499278843856]
  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis faces significant challenges due to limited dataset sizes and domain variability between studies.<n>Traditional self-supervised learning methods inspired by computer vision often rely on positive and negative sample pairs.<n>We propose adapting a recently developed Hierarchical Functional Maximal Correlation Algorithm (HFMCA) to graph-structured fMRI data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T12:35:01Z)
• Unified Supervision For Vision-Language Modeling in 3D Computed Tomography [1.4193731654133002]
  General-purpose vision-language models (VLMs) have emerged as promising tools in radiology, offering zero-shot capabilities.<n>In high-stakes domains like diagnostic radiology, these models often lack the discriminative precision required for reliable clinical use.<n>We introduce Uniferum, a volumetric VLM that unifies diverse supervision signals, encoded in classification labels and segmentation masks, into a single training framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T15:30:17Z)
• FedGIN: Federated Learning with Dynamic Global Intensity Non-linear Augmentation for Organ Segmentation using Multi-modal Images [0.0]
  Medical image segmentation plays a crucial role in AI-assisted diagnostics, surgical planning, and treatment monitoring.<n>We propose FedGIN, a Federated Learning framework that enables multimodal organ segmentation without sharing raw patient data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T08:16:35Z)
• SAMRI-2: A Memory-based Model for Cartilage and Meniscus Segmentation in 3D MRIs of the Knee Joint [0.7879983966759583]
  This study introduces a deep learning (DL) method for cartilage and meniscus segmentation from 3D MRIs using memory-based VFMs.<n>We trained four AI models-a CNN-based 3D-VNet, two automatic transformer-based models (SaMRI2D and SaMRI3D), and a transformer-based promptable memory-based VFM (SAMRI-2)-on 3D knee MRIs from 270 patients.<n>SAMRI-2 model, trained with HSS, outperformed all other models, achieving an average improvement of 5 points, with a peak improvement of 12 points for tibial cartilage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T21:18:01Z)
• The effect of data augmentation and 3D-CNN depth on Alzheimer's Disease detection [51.697248252191265]
  This work summarizes and strictly observes best practices regarding data handling, experimental design, and model evaluation. We focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection, which serves as a paradigmatic example of challenging problem in healthcare. Within this framework, we train predictive 15 models, considering three different data augmentation strategies and five distinct 3D CNN architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T10:40:41Z)
• K-Space-Aware Cross-Modality Score for Synthesized Neuroimage Quality Assessment [71.27193056354741]
  The problem of how to assess cross-modality medical image synthesis has been largely unexplored. We propose a new metric K-CROSS to spur progress on this challenging problem. K-CROSS uses a pre-trained multi-modality segmentation network to predict the lesion location.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T01:26:48Z)
• ARHNet: Adaptive Region Harmonization for Lesion-aware Augmentation to Improve Segmentation Performance [61.04246102067351]
  We propose a foreground harmonization framework (ARHNet) to tackle intensity disparities and make synthetic images look more realistic. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method in improving the segmentation performance using real and synthetic images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-02T10:39:29Z)
• Rethinking Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation: A Variance-Reduction Perspective [51.70661197256033]
  We propose ARCO, a semi-supervised contrastive learning framework with stratified group theory for medical image segmentation. We first propose building ARCO through the concept of variance-reduced estimation and show that certain variance-reduction techniques are particularly beneficial in pixel/voxel-level segmentation tasks. We experimentally validate our approaches on eight benchmarks, i.e., five 2D/3D medical and three semantic segmentation datasets, with different label settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T13:50:25Z)
• Negligible effect of brain MRI data preprocessing for tumor segmentation [36.89606202543839]
  We conduct experiments on three publicly available datasets and evaluate the effect of different preprocessing steps in deep neural networks. Our results demonstrate that most popular standardization steps add no value to the network performance. We suggest that image intensity normalization approaches do not contribute to model accuracy because of the reduction of signal variance with image standardization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T17:29:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.