HARP: The Human--AI Research Platform
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20773v1
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:38:16 GMT
- Title: HARP: The Human--AI Research Platform
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have shifted human--computer interaction from traditional'' interface journeys toward more conversational exchanges.<n>HarP places participants in controlled mock scenarios with live, AI agents.<n>HarP enables systematic testing of how AI design choices affect users.
- Score: 0.9332987715848716
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shifted human--computer interaction from `traditional'' interface journeys toward more conversational exchanges. Researchers studying HCI and UI use moderated usability sessions, interviews, surveys, transcript analysis, and static prototypes. However, static prototypes provide limited opportunities to study interaction with live AI systems or systematically control how an LLM behaves across participants and scenarios. Conversation transcripts reveal little about how users formulate, revise, and hesitate over prompts before submission. We designed the Human--AI Research Platform (HARP) for researchers, designers, and anyone who has ever wondered, `What if AI did this?' HARP places participants in controlled mock scenarios with live, configurable AI agents. Researchers can control agent prompts, model parameters, response characteristics, and experimental conditions; trigger surveys at predefined moments; and record prompt composition time, response latency, deletions, and keystroke pauses. Planned capabilities include voice, facial expression, gesture, and, where legally and ethically appropriate, emotion analysis. We illustrate HARP through a study examining how technical specificity and response length affect retention of LLM output. By pairing controllable live agents with behavioral and self-report measures, HARP enables systematic testing of how AI design choices affect users.
Related papers
- Behavior Prompting Policy: Demonstrations as Prompts for Manipulation [12.69446064622751]
We study behavior prompting, a paradigm that enables robots to perform new tasks at inference time given a single human demonstration.<n>We present contributions in algorithm, data, and evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-29T15:23:44Z) - Towards Unconstrained Human-Object Interaction [55.123145316966635]
Human-Object Interaction (HOI) detection is a longstanding computer vision problem.<n>With the advent of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) it has become feasible to explore more flexible paradigms for interaction recognition.<n>In this work, we revisit HOI detection through the lens of MLLMs and apply them to in-the-wild HOI detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-15T16:39:28Z) - Dyadic: A Scalable Platform for Human-Human and Human-AI Conversation Research [0.16921396880325779]
Dyadic is a web-based platform for studying human-human and human-AI conversations using text-based or voice-based chats.<n>Dyadic is distinct from other platforms by offering studies with multiple modalities, AI suggestions, live monitoring, and survey deployment.<n>No coding is required to operate Dyadic directly, and integrations with existing survey platforms are offered.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T17:25:45Z) - PersonaCite: VoC-Grounded Interviewable Agentic Synthetic AI Personas for Verifiable User and Design Research [0.0]
We present PersonaCite, an agentic system that reframes AI personas as evidence-bounded research instruments through retrieval-augmented interaction.<n>Unlike prior approaches that rely on prompt-based roleplaying, PersonaCite retrieves actual voice-of-customer artifacts during each conversation turn, constrains responses to retrieved evidence, explicitly abstains when evidence is missing, and provides response-level source attribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T20:03:19Z) - See, Think, Act: Online Shopper Behavior Simulation with VLM Agents [58.92444959954643]
This paper investigates the integration of visual information, specifically webpage screenshots, into behavior simulation via VLMs.<n>We employ SFT for joint action prediction and rationale generation, conditioning on the full interaction context.<n>To further enhance reasoning capabilities, we integrate RL with a hierarchical reward structure, scaled by a difficulty-aware factor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-22T05:07:14Z) - HumAIne-Chatbot: Real-Time Personalized Conversational AI via Reinforcement Learning [0.4931504898146351]
textbfHumAIne-chatbot is an AI-driven conversational agent that personalizes responses through a novel user profiling framework.<n>During live interactions, an online reinforcement learning agent refines per-user models by combining implicit signals.<n>Results show consistent improvements in user satisfaction, personalization accuracy, and task achievement when personalization features were enabled.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-04T15:16:38Z) - AI Telephone Surveying: Automating Quantitative Data Collection with an AI Interviewer [1.8929175690169533]
We built and tested an AI system to conduct quantitative surveys based on large language models (LLM), automatic speech recognition (ASR), and speech synthesis technologies.<n>The system was specifically designed for quantitative research, and strictly adhered to research best practices like question order randomization, answer order randomization, and exact wording.<n>Our results suggest that shorter instruments and more responsive AI interviewers may contribute to improvements across all three metrics studied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-23T17:30:14Z) - A Desideratum for Conversational Agents: Capabilities, Challenges, and Future Directions [51.96890647837277]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have propelled conversational AI from traditional dialogue systems into sophisticated agents capable of autonomous actions, contextual awareness, and multi-turn interactions with users.<n>This survey paper presents a desideratum for next-generation Conversational Agents - what has been achieved, what challenges persist, and what must be done for more scalable systems that approach human-level intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T21:01:25Z) - Collaborative Instance Object Navigation: Leveraging Uncertainty-Awareness to Minimize Human-Agent Dialogues [54.81155589931697]
Collaborative Instance object Navigation (CoIN) is a new task setting where the agent actively resolve uncertainties about the target instance.<n>We propose a novel training-free method, Agent-user Interaction with UncerTainty Awareness (AIUTA)<n>First, upon object detection, a Self-Questioner model initiates a self-dialogue within the agent to obtain a complete and accurate observation description.<n>An Interaction Trigger module determines whether to ask a question to the human, continue or halt navigation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-02T08:16:38Z) - Survey of User Interface Design and Interaction Techniques in Generative AI Applications [79.55963742878684]
We aim to create a compendium of different user-interaction patterns that can be used as a reference for designers and developers alike.
We also strive to lower the entry barrier for those attempting to learn more about the design of generative AI applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T23:10:06Z) - Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A
Survey [71.43956423427397]
We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance.
This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings.
Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.