Scientific exploration, collaboration and labor division in the large language model era

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20923v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 04:58:41 GMT
• Title: Scientific exploration, collaboration and labor division in the large language model era
• Abstract summary: After 2022, scientists increasingly published across more intellectually distant fields.<n>Increases in interdisciplinarity and exploration were especially pronounced among established scientists and scientists from non-English-speaking low- and middle-income countries.<n>This study indicates that the LLM era coincides with a broader reorganization of scientific exploration, collaboration, and the division of labor.
• Score: 6.9617893562441
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly and significantly entered scientific workflows, but it remains unclear how their diffusion is associated with changes in scientists' strategies in research directions and team building. We link PubMed Central full text with OpenAlex publication and collaboration histories for 775,323 scientists and analyze CRediT contribution statements from 137,120 multi-author papers. After 2022, scientists increasingly published across more intellectually distant fields and entered fields in which they had not previously worked. These increases in interdisciplinarity and exploration were especially pronounced among established scientists and scientists from non-English-speaking low- and middle-income countries. Authors with stronger AI-writing signals were already more interdisciplinary and exploratory before the widespread adoption of LLMs, and the gap widened further after 2022 compared with authors with weaker AI-writing signals. Scientists' collaboration networks also became more interdisciplinary after 2022. Yet, among authors with stronger AI-writing signals, research interdisciplinarity was less closely tied to the disciplinary diversity of their collaborators. The division of labor within research teams also became more differentiated. Contributors on papers published after 2022 reported narrower role sets on average, coauthors shared fewer roles in common, and their role profiles became less rigid and more fluid. Software and validation roles increased, while conceptual and management roles decreased. These patterns suggest that team members are taking on more distinct responsibilities and may rely less on one another to perform research tasks. Overall, this study indicates that the LLM era coincides with a broader reorganization of scientific exploration, collaboration, and the division of labor.

Related papers

• Return of the solo author: The changing division of labor in science in the age of generative A [0.0]
  We show that the decades-long decline in solo authorship halted and partially reversed with ChatGPT's public release in late 2022.<n>We also reveal that this is strongest in fields where coauthors' work is more readily replaceable, and weak or absent in fields that depend on physical collaboration.<n>This study offers an empirical probe of how generative AI can substitute for scientific labor, and evidence of a reconfiguration of cognitive labor within papers rather than of team size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-12T14:17:39Z)
• Human-AI Collaboration in Science at Scale: A Global Large-scale Randomized Field Experiment [30.183277651952196]
  We deliver customized AI-based feedback for over 31,000 arXiv preprints.<n>Authors who received feedback had a significantly higher likelihood of revising their manuscripts.<n>These effects were strongest among authors from non-English-dominant research regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T20:06:17Z)
• Smaller, Younger, and More Impactful: How AI-Assisted Writing Transforms Research Teams [2.085881808809108]
  We examined whether and how AI-assisted writing influences team structure and team outcomes in science.<n>We found that research teams using AI-assisted writing tend to be younger and smaller.<n>Our findings call for policy improvements in research evaluation, funding, and training to address this emerging trend.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T09:47:58Z)
• Does GenAI Rewrite How We Write? An Empirical Study on Two-Million Preprints [15.070885964897734]
  Generative large language models (LLMs) introduce a further potential disruption by altering how manuscripts are written.<n>This paper addresses the gap through a large-scale analysis of more than 2.1 million preprints spanning 2016--2025 (115 months) across four major repositories.<n>Our findings reveal that LLMs have accelerated submission and revision cycles, modestly increased linguistic complexity, and disproportionately expanded AI-related topics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-18T01:37:40Z)
• ScienceBoard: Evaluating Multimodal Autonomous Agents in Realistic Scientific Workflows [82.07367406991678]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have extended their impact beyond Natural Language Processing.<n>Among these, computer-using agents are capable of interacting with operating systems as humans do.<n>We introduce ScienceBoard, which encompasses a realistic, multi-domain environment featuring dynamic and visually rich scientific software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T12:27:27Z)
• AI Expands Scientists' Impact but Contracts Science's Focus [15.771625061196927]
  We show accelerated adoption of AI among scientists and consistent professional advantages associated with AI use.<n>Scientists who engage in AI-augmented research publish 3.02 times more papers, receive 4.84 times more citations.<n>By contrast, AI research shrinks the collective volume of scientific topics studied by 4.63%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T18:24:17Z)
• Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by A LLM-Based Multi-Agent System [62.832818186789545]
  Virtual Scientists (VirSci) is a multi-agent system designed to mimic the teamwork inherent in scientific research.<n>VirSci organizes a team of agents to collaboratively generate, evaluate, and refine research ideas.<n>We show that this multi-agent approach outperforms the state-of-the-art method in producing novel scientific ideas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:16:22Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discovery [68.48094108571432]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the way text and other modalities of data are handled. We aim to provide a more holistic view of the research landscape by unveiling cross-field and cross-modal connections between scientific LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T08:03:24Z)
• ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models [56.08917291606421]
  ResearchAgent is an AI-based system for ideation and operationalization of novel work.<n>ResearchAgent automatically defines novel problems, proposes methods and designs experiments, while iteratively refining them.<n>We experimentally validate our ResearchAgent on scientific publications across multiple disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T13:36:29Z)
• Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers [99.67983375899719]
  We conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals. Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T17:45:15Z)
• Flat Teams Drive Scientific Innovation [43.65818554474622]
  We show how individual activities cohere into broad roles of leadership through the direction and presentation of research. The hidden hierarchy of a scientific team is characterized by its lead (or L)-ratio of members playing leadership roles to total team size. We find that relative to flat, egalitarian teams, tall, hierarchical teams produce less novelty and more often develop existing ideas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T04:07:49Z)
• Learnings from Frontier Development Lab and SpaceML -- AI Accelerators for NASA and ESA [57.06643156253045]
  Research with AI and ML technologies lives in a variety of settings with often asynchronous goals and timelines. We perform a case study of the Frontier Development Lab (FDL), an AI accelerator under a public-private partnership from NASA and ESA. FDL research follows principled practices that are grounded in responsible development, conduct, and dissemination of AI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T21:23:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.