Leveraging External Knowledge for Historical Document Restoration via Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21936v1
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 03:11:25 GMT
- Title: Leveraging External Knowledge for Historical Document Restoration via Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
- Abstract summary: We introduce a novel framework for historical document restoration that leverages large language models with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)<n>Our approach significantly outperforms baselines, achieving substantial gains in restoring both general characters and named entities.<n> comprehensive evaluations including expert assessments confirm that ARI serves as a practical tool for domain experts, promising to accelerate the analysis of historical records.
- Score: 1.0026496861838445
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Historical documents act as invaluable knowledge archives but often suffer from illegibility due to physical deterioration and damage. While existing restoration methods based on masked language modeling effectively utilize local context, they struggle to restore named entities that require external historical knowledge. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel framework for historical document restoration that leverages large language models with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). By combining the implicit knowledge of pre-trained LLMs with explicitly retrieved external context, our model ARI effectively mitigates the challenge of inferring context-dependent proper nouns. Extensive experiments on Korean historical documents demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms baselines, achieving substantial gains in restoring both general characters and named entities. Furthermore, comprehensive evaluations including expert assessments confirm that ARI serves as a practical tool for domain experts, promising to accelerate the analysis of historical records.
Related papers
- Robust Interpretation of Historical Documents in Knowledge Graphs Through Query Inference and Execution [5.02509168950652]
We present an agentic retrieval system designed to deliver more accurate and verifiable access to historical data.<n>We introduce a semi-symbolic framework that integrates word-spotting techniques for post-OCR correction with a knowledge graph representation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-27T14:11:20Z) - Conversational Retrieval and On-the-Fly Knowledge Modeling of Historical Penitentiary Repression Records [1.4804887845421213]
We present a document analysis system designed for the management of historical digital libraries.<n>The system is equipped with the capability to store facts produced by expert archivists or derived from document retrieval processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-09T13:18:52Z) - Pretraining Language Models on Historical Text [36.643370581003055]
We introduce TypewriterLM, a 7.24B History language model (LM) trained exclusively on English text predating 1913.<n>We construct TypewriterCorpus, a 54B-token historical corpus with extensive data cleaning and leakage mitigation procedures.<n>We also introduce lexically grounded instructing tuning, a post-training framework that constraints responses to remain directly grounded in historical source documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-02T00:59:06Z) - Leveraging LLM Parametric Knowledge for Fact Checking without Retrieval [60.25608870901428]
Trustworthiness is a core research challenge for agentic AI systems built on Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose the task of fact-checking without retrieval, focusing on the verification of arbitrary natural language claims, independent of their source robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-05T18:42:51Z) - Document Reconstruction Unlocks Scalable Long-Context RLVR [60.74632963522131]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards(RLVR) has become a prominent paradigm to enhance the capabilities (i.e. long-context) of Large Language Models(LLMs)<n>We investigate unsupervised approaches to enhance the long-context capabilities of LLMs, eliminating the need for heavy human annotations or teacher models' supervision.<n>We validate the effectiveness of our method on two widely used benchmarks, RULER and LongBenchv2.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-09T03:23:23Z) - LANPO: Bootstrapping Language and Numerical Feedback for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs [73.27182315028021]
LANPO is a framework that cleanly separates the roles of feedback: language guides exploration, while numerical rewards drive optimization.<n>Our work provides a robust method for integrating historical experiences into the LLM RL loop, creating more effective and data-efficient learning agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-18T15:51:19Z) - Improving Context Fidelity via Native Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning [35.50952279309109]
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with context fidelity, producing inconsistent answers when responding to questions based on provided information.<n>We propose CARE, a novel native retrieval-augmented reasoning framework that teaches LLMs to explicitly integrate in-context evidence within their reasoning process with the model's own retrieval capabilities.<n>Our method requires limited labeled evidence data while significantly enhancing both retrieval accuracy and answer generation performance through strategically retrieved in-context tokens in the reasoning chain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-17T04:28:07Z) - Named Entity Recognition of Historical Text via Large Language Model [1.5469452301122175]
Named Entity Recognition (NER) plays a crucial role in extracting information from unstructured text.<n>Traditionally, NER is addressed using supervised machine learning approaches, which require large amounts of annotated training data.<n>In this study, we explore the feasibility of applying LLMs to NER in historical documents using zero-shot and few-shot prompting strategies.<n>Our experiments, conducted on the HIPE-2022 dataset, show that LLMs can achieve reasonably strong performance on NER tasks in this setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-25T14:52:11Z) - Modern Models, Medieval Texts: A POS Tagging Study of Old Occitan [0.1979158763744267]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing.<n>This study examines the performance of open-source LLMs in part-of-speech (POS) tagging for Old Occitan.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-10T20:16:01Z) - Large Language Models are Limited in Out-of-Context Knowledge Reasoning [65.72847298578071]
Large Language Models (LLMs) possess extensive knowledge and strong capabilities in performing in-context reasoning.
This paper focuses on a significant aspect of out-of-context reasoning: Out-of-Context Knowledge Reasoning (OCKR), which is to combine multiple knowledge to infer new knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T15:58:59Z) - REAR: A Relevance-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Open-Domain Question Answering [115.72130322143275]
REAR is a RElevance-Aware Retrieval-augmented approach for open-domain question answering (QA)
We develop a novel architecture for LLM-based RAG systems, by incorporating a specially designed assessment module.
Experiments on four open-domain QA tasks show that REAR significantly outperforms previous a number of competitive RAG approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T13:22:51Z) - Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative
Retrieval-Generation Synergy [164.83371924650294]
We show that strong performance can be achieved by a method we call Iter-RetGen, which synergizes retrieval and generation in an iterative manner.
A model output shows what might be needed to finish a task, and thus provides an informative context for retrieving more relevant knowledge.
Iter-RetGen processes all retrieved knowledge as a whole and largely preserves the flexibility in generation without structural constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T16:17:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.