Co-Harness: Co-Evolving Harnesses and Model Weights for LLM Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22688v1
• Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 02:39:57 GMT
• Title: Co-Harness: Co-Evolving Harnesses and Model Weights for LLM Agents
• Abstract summary: Co-Harness is a framework that jointly optimize the agent harness and model parameters during post-training.<n>An autonomous case study shows that Co-Harness can recover from system crashes, improve inference efficiency, and discover ensemble strategies without human intervention.
• Score: 37.91666123749406
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Post-training agents for automated AI research requires optimizing not only model parameters, but also the runtime harness that shapes how research trajectories are generated, evaluated, and learned from. Existing pipelines typically train models under a fixed harness, including prompts, tools, skills, middleware, and memory, while leaving the data-generating process outside the optimization objective. This creates a mismatch between model updates and the static scaffolding that determines trajectory quality. We introduce Co-Harness, a framework that jointly optimizes the agent harness and model parameters during post-training. Co-Harness alternates between harness optimization and model optimization. An LLM-based HarnessCritic analyzes failed trajectories, identifies harness-level failure modes, and proposes validated local updates. The model is then fine-tuned on high-quality trajectories generated by the improved harness, distilling effective scaffolding into model parameters. A 200+ hour autonomous case study further shows that Co-Harness can recover from system crashes, improve inference efficiency, and discover ensemble strategies without human intervention. These results suggest that joint harness and model optimization is an effective way to improve agents beyond fixed-harness post-training.

Related papers

• Self-Evolving Embodied Agents via Skill-Harness Evolution [53.307052568223945]
  Embodied agents are increasingly built as systems around foundation models.<n>While supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning can adapt agents to new environments, they require additional data, rewards, and training runs.<n>We propose SHAPER, a self-evolving framework for train-free embodied adaptation that keeps model parameters frozen.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T18:55:58Z)
• Recursive Harness Self-Improvement [28.432258880153125]
  Under model--harness co-evolution, harnesses are data-generating components whose execution traces can shape future foundation models.<n>We introduce Recursive Harness Self-Improvement (RHI), which represents the harness as a prompt-level specification of the agent loop.<n>RHI iteratively refines it using pairwise feedback over its own revision history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T00:21:19Z)
• Evolving Agents in the Dark: Retrospective Harness Optimization via Self-Preference [51.55077364626896]
  We introduce Retrospective Harness Optimization (RHO), a self-supervised method that optimize agent harness using only past trajectories.<n>RHO selects a diverse coreset of challenging tasks from past trajectories and re-solves them in parallel.<n>A single optimization round improves the pass rate on SWE-Bench Pro from 59% to 78% without any external grading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T09:26:00Z)
• Structuring a Training Strategy to Robustify Perception Models with Realistic Image Augmentations [1.5723316845301678]
  This report introduces a novel methodology for training with augmentations to enhance model robustness and performance in such conditions. We present a comprehensive framework that includes identifying weak spots in Machine Learning models, selecting suitable augmentations, and devising effective training strategies. Experimental results demonstrate improvements in model performance, as measured by commonly used metrics such as mean Average Precision (mAP) and mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) on open-source object detection and semantic segmentation models and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T14:15:48Z)
• SMILE: Zero-Shot Sparse Mixture of Low-Rank Experts Construction From Pre-Trained Foundation Models [85.67096251281191]
  We present an innovative approach to model fusion called zero-shot Sparse MIxture of Low-rank Experts (SMILE) construction. SMILE allows for the upscaling of source models into an MoE model without extra data or further training. We conduct extensive experiments across diverse scenarios, such as image classification and text generation tasks, using full fine-tuning and LoRA fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T17:32:15Z)
• Towards Stable Machine Learning Model Retraining via Slowly Varying Sequences [6.067007470552307]
  We propose a model-agnostic framework for finding sequences of models that are stable across retraining iterations.<n>We develop a mixed-integer optimization formulation that is guaranteed to recover optimal models.<n>We find that, on average, a 2% reduction in predictive power leads to a 30% improvement in stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T22:45:38Z)
• Deep autoregressive density nets vs neural ensembles for model-based offline reinforcement learning [2.9158689853305693]
  We consider a model-based reinforcement learning algorithm that infers the system dynamics from the available data and performs policy optimization on imaginary model rollouts. This approach is vulnerable to exploiting model errors which can lead to catastrophic failures on the real system. We show that better performance can be obtained with a single well-calibrated autoregressive model on the D4RL benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T10:18:15Z)
• QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
  We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement. QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights. We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z)
• When to Update Your Model: Constrained Model-based Reinforcement Learning [50.74369835934703]
  We propose a novel and general theoretical scheme for a non-decreasing performance guarantee of model-based RL (MBRL) Our follow-up derived bounds reveal the relationship between model shifts and performance improvement. A further example demonstrates that learning models from a dynamically-varying number of explorations benefit the eventual returns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T17:57:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.