Deep autoregressive density nets vs neural ensembles for model-based
offline reinforcement learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02858v1
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:18:15 GMT
- Title: Deep autoregressive density nets vs neural ensembles for model-based
offline reinforcement learning
- Authors: Abdelhakim Benechehab, Albert Thomas and Bal\'azs K\'egl
- Abstract summary: We consider a model-based reinforcement learning algorithm that infers the system dynamics from the available data and performs policy optimization on imaginary model rollouts.
This approach is vulnerable to exploiting model errors which can lead to catastrophic failures on the real system.
We show that better performance can be obtained with a single well-calibrated autoregressive model on the D4RL benchmark.
- Score: 2.9158689853305693
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We consider the problem of offline reinforcement learning where only a set of
system transitions is made available for policy optimization. Following recent
advances in the field, we consider a model-based reinforcement learning
algorithm that infers the system dynamics from the available data and performs
policy optimization on imaginary model rollouts. This approach is vulnerable to
exploiting model errors which can lead to catastrophic failures on the real
system. The standard solution is to rely on ensembles for uncertainty
heuristics and to avoid exploiting the model where it is too uncertain. We
challenge the popular belief that we must resort to ensembles by showing that
better performance can be obtained with a single well-calibrated autoregressive
model on the D4RL benchmark. We also analyze static metrics of model-learning
and conclude on the important model properties for the final performance of the
agent.
Related papers
- SeMOPO: Learning High-quality Model and Policy from Low-quality Offline Visual Datasets [32.496818080222646]
We propose a new approach to model-based offline reinforcement learning.
We provide a theoretical guarantee of model uncertainty and performance bound of SeMOPO.
Experimental results show that our method substantially outperforms all baseline methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T15:16:38Z) - Towards Stable Machine Learning Model Retraining via Slowly Varying Sequences [6.067007470552307]
We propose a methodology for finding sequences of machine learning models that are stable across retraining iterations.
We develop a mixed-integer optimization formulation that is guaranteed to recover optimal models.
Our method shows stronger stability than greedily trained models with a small, controllable sacrifice in predictive power.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-28T22:45:38Z) - The Edge-of-Reach Problem in Offline Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [37.387280102209274]
offline reinforcement learning aims to enable agents to be trained from pre-collected datasets, however, this comes with the added challenge of estimating the value of behavior not covered in the dataset.
Model-based methods offer a solution by allowing agents to collect additional synthetic data via rollouts in a learned dynamics model.
However, if the learned dynamics model is replaced by the true error-free dynamics, existing model-based methods completely fail.
We propose Reach-Aware Value Learning (RAVL), a simple and robust method that directly addresses the edge-of-reach problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T20:38:00Z) - MOTO: Offline Pre-training to Online Fine-tuning for Model-based Robot
Learning [52.101643259906915]
We study the problem of offline pre-training and online fine-tuning for reinforcement learning from high-dimensional observations.
Existing model-based offline RL methods are not suitable for offline-to-online fine-tuning in high-dimensional domains.
We propose an on-policy model-based method that can efficiently reuse prior data through model-based value expansion and policy regularization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-06T21:04:31Z) - Learning a model is paramount for sample efficiency in reinforcement
learning control of PDEs [5.488334211013093]
We show that learning an actuated model in parallel to training the RL agent significantly reduces the total amount of required data sampled from the real system.
We also show that iteratively updating the model is of major importance to avoid biases in the RL training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-14T16:14:39Z) - When to Update Your Model: Constrained Model-based Reinforcement
Learning [50.74369835934703]
We propose a novel and general theoretical scheme for a non-decreasing performance guarantee of model-based RL (MBRL)
Our follow-up derived bounds reveal the relationship between model shifts and performance improvement.
A further example demonstrates that learning models from a dynamically-varying number of explorations benefit the eventual returns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-15T17:57:43Z) - Model Generation with Provable Coverability for Offline Reinforcement
Learning [14.333861814143718]
offline optimization with dynamics-aware policy provides a new perspective for policy learning and out-of-distribution generalization.
But due to the limitation under the offline setting, the learned model could not mimic real dynamics well enough to support reliable out-of-distribution exploration.
We propose an algorithm to generate models optimizing their coverage for the real dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-01T08:34:09Z) - COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimization [120.55713363569845]
Uncertainty estimation with complex models, such as deep neural networks, can be difficult and unreliable.
We develop a new model-based offline RL algorithm, COMBO, that regularizes the value function on out-of-support state-actions.
We find that COMBO consistently performs as well or better as compared to prior offline model-free and model-based methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-16T18:50:32Z) - Control as Hybrid Inference [62.997667081978825]
We present an implementation of CHI which naturally mediates the balance between iterative and amortised inference.
We verify the scalability of our algorithm on a continuous control benchmark, demonstrating that it outperforms strong model-free and model-based baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-11T19:44:09Z) - Model-Augmented Actor-Critic: Backpropagating through Paths [81.86992776864729]
Current model-based reinforcement learning approaches use the model simply as a learned black-box simulator.
We show how to make more effective use of the model by exploiting its differentiability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-16T19:18:10Z) - Information Theoretic Model Predictive Q-Learning [64.74041985237105]
We present a novel theoretical connection between information theoretic MPC and entropy regularized RL.
We develop a Q-learning algorithm that can leverage biased models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-31T00:29:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.